Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 9, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Gagnon, Marie Pierre ^a,b   Lepage Savary, Dolorès ^c   Gagnon, Johanne ^a,b   St Pierre, Michèle ^b   Simard, Chantale ^c   Rhainds, Marc ^c   Lemieux, Renald ^d   Gauvin, François Pierre ^a   Desmartis, Marie ^a   Légaré, France ^a,b  

^a Quebec University Hospital   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION; SCIENTIST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CONSENSUS; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY;

CONSENSUS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUEBEC; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 65349146594     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-54     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Conceptualizing and Combining Evidence for Health System Guidance. J Lomas T Culyer C McCutcheon L McAuley S Law, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation 2005 38 16379451
2. Health technology assessment and clinical decision making: which is the best evidence? A Granados, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1999 15 3 585 592 10874384 (Pubitemid 29466189)
3. Evaluation des technologies de la santé au Québec: Bilans et défis. P Lehoux R Battista, Le système de santé au Québec: Organisations, acteurs et enjeux Quebec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval 2003 435 464
4. Improving research dissemination and uptake in the health sector: Beyond the sound of one hand clapping. J Lomas, Hamilton, Ont.: McMaster University, Centre for Health Economics Policy and Policy Analysis 1997
5. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. M McGregor JM Brophy, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005 21 2 263 267 15921068 (Pubitemid 40656557)
6. JA Muir Gray, Evidence-based healthcare: how to make health policy and management decisions London: Churchill Livingstone 1997
7. Consumers and Canadian Health Care Trending Analysis 2004. The Change Foundation in partnership with IBM Business Consulting, Volume February 2005 23
8. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back [editorial; comment] [see comments]. A Coulter, BMJ 1999 319 7212 719 720 10487980
9. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. SH Woolf EC Chan R Harris SL Sheridan CH Braddock 3rd RM Kaplan A Krist AM O'Connor S Tunis, Ann Intern Med 2005 143 4 293 300 16103473 (Pubitemid 41134224)
10. Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future. JF Bridges C Jones, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007 23 1 30 35 10.1017/S0266462307051549 17234014 (Pubitemid 46648297)
11. Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. J Abelson M Giacomini P Lehoux FP Gauvin, Health Policy 2007 82 1 37 50 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009 16996637 (Pubitemid 46610527)
12. Public Involvement in Health Technology Assessment Agencies: A Comparative Analysis of Canada, Denmark, and the United Kingdom, PhD. FP Gauvin, McMaster University, Hamilton (Ontario, Canada) 2008
13. Patient and public involvement. H Cayton, J Health Serv Res Policy 2004 9 4 193 194 10.1258/1355819042250195 15511317 (Pubitemid 39424757)
14. Understanding Health Technology Assessement (HTA). Health Equality Europe, HEA Guide to HTA for Patients 2008 48
15. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. J Boote R Telford C Cooper, Health Policy 2002 61 2 213 236 10.1016/S0168-8510(01) 00214-7 12088893 (Pubitemid 34669916)
16. Technologies de santé et prise de décision. Organisation de coopération et de développement économique (OCDE), Paris, OCDE 2005
17. Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged? VA Entwistle AJ Sowden IS Watt, J Health Serv Res Policy 1998 3 2 100 107 10180658 (Pubitemid 28185075)
18. Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program. J Royle S Oliver, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004 20 4 493 497 10.1017/S0266462304001412 15609801 (Pubitemid 39491499)
19. Does health technology assessment benefit health services and politics? The experiences of an established HTA institution: the Danish Centre for Evaluation and HTA. H Sigmund FB Kristensen, Eur J Health Econ 2002 3 1 54 58 10.1007/s10198-001-0082-5 15609118 (Pubitemid 41214085)
20. Descripción de iniciativas de participación ciudadana en la planificación e implementación de políticas en sistemas sanitarios públicos. JJ Cerezo Espinoza de los Monteros T Hermosilla Gago E Briones Pérez de la Blanca S Vidal Serrano MP Gagnon, Mars 06: Agencia de Evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias de Andalucía 2006
21. Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level the Israeli experience. S Shani MI Siebzehner O Luxenburg J Shemer, Health Policy 2000 54 3 169 185 10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00109-3 11154787 (Pubitemid 32012607)
22. Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury. D Menon T Stafinski, Health Expect 2008 11 3 282 293 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00501.x 18816324
23. A consumer involvement model for health technology assessment in Canada. J Pivik E Rode C Ward, Health Policy 2004 69 2 253 268 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003. 12.012 15212871 (Pubitemid 38801501)
24. Consumer involvement in health technology assessment. D Hailey, Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. HTA Initiative #21 2005
25. 'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. A Liva J Coast J Donovan J Eyles J Shepherd J Tacchi J Abelson K Morgan, Soc Sci Med 2002 54 12 1825 1837 10.1016/S0277- 9536(01)00151-4 12113438 (Pubitemid 34462159)
26. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. K Gravel F Légaré ID Graham, Implement Sci 2006 1 1 16 16899124 10.1186/1748-5908-1-16
27. Primary health care professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in practice. F Légaré AM O'Connor ID Graham D Saucier L Côté J Blais M Cauchon L Paré Patient Educ Couns 2006 63 3 380 390 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.011 17010555 (Pubitemid 44511877)
28. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. F Légaré S Ratté K Gravel ID Graham, Patient Educ Couns 2008 73 3 526 535 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018 18752915
29. Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation: an exploratory study. AR Gagliardi L Lemieux-Charles AD Brown T Sullivan V Goel, Patient Educ Couns 2008 70 2 234 241 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.009 18023129
30. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. E Nilsen H Myrhaug M Johansen S Oliver A Oxman, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006 3 CD004563 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004563.pub2.
31. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. G Elwyn A O'Connor D Stacey R Volk A Edwards A Coulter R Thomson A Barratt M Barry S Bernstein, BMJ 2006 333 7565 417 16908462 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE (Pubitemid 44320126)
32. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. AM O'Connor P Tugwell GA Wells T Elmslie E Jolly G Hollingworth R McPherson H Bunn I Graham E Drake, Patient Educ Couns 1998 33 3 267 279 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00026-3 9731164 (Pubitemid 28168092)
33. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. S Oliver L Clarke-Jones R Rees R Milne P Buchanan J Gabbay G Gyte A Oakley K Stein, Health Technol Assess 2004 8 15 1 148 IIIIV. 15080866 (Pubitemid 38714268)
34. Qualitative knowing in action research. DT Campbell, Methodology and epistemology for social science: Selected papers of Donald T Campbell Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, Overman S, 1988 360 376
35. Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals. MP Gagnon F Legare M Labrecque P Fremont P Pluye J Gagnon J Car C Pagliari M Desmartis L Turcot, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 1 CD006093 19160265
36. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. B Chaudhry J Wang S Wu M Maglione W Mojica E Roth SC Morton PG Shekelle, Ann Intern Med 2006 144 10 742 752 16702590 (Pubitemid 46780634)
37. A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? C Delpierre L Cuzin J Fillaux M Alvarez P Massip T Lang, Int J Qual Health Care 2004 16 5 407 416 10.1093/intqhc/mzh064 15375102 (Pubitemid 39359429)
38. Analyzing computer based patient records: a review of literature. TL Erstad, J Healthc Inf Manag 2003 17 4 51 57 14558372
39. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. K Kawamoto CA Houlihan EA Balas DF Lobach, BMJ 2005 330 7494 765 15767266 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F (Pubitemid 40522338)
40. BL Paterson SE Thorne C Canam C Jillings, Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2001
41. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. J Popay A Rogers G Williams, Qual Health Res 1998 8 3 341 351 10.1177/104973239800800305 10558335 (Pubitemid 128624442)
42. The Cochrane Collaboration open learning material for reviewers. http://www.cochrane-net.org/openlearning/
43. Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group. http://www.joannabriggs.edu. au/cqrmg/about.html
44. Is it a Focus Group? Tips on How to Tell. RA Krueger, J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2006 33 4 363 366 16932117
45. Advancing theories, models and measurement for an interprofessional approach to shared decision making in primary care: a study protocol. F Légaré D Stacey ID Graham G Elwyn P Pluye MP Gagnon D Frosch MB Harrison J Kryworuchko S Pouliot, BMC health services research 2008 8 2 18173848 10.1186/1472-6963-8-2
46. Designing funded qualitative research. JM Morse, Handbook of qualitative research Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, 1994
47. AM Huberman MB Miles, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 1994
48. The potential influence of small group processes on guideline development. C Pagliari J Grimshaw M Eccles, J Eval Clin Pract 2001 7 2 165 173 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00272.x 11489041 (Pubitemid 32489009)
49. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. N Mays C Pope J Popay, J Health Serv Res Policy 2005 10 suppl 1 S1:6 S1:20 (Pubitemid 40993881)
50. Deliberative processes and evidence-informed decisionmaking in health care do they work and how might we know? AJ Culyer J Lomas, Evidence and Policy 2006 2 3 357 371
51. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Lavis H Davies A Oxman JL Denis K Golden-Biddle E Ferlie, J Health Serv Res Policy 2005 10 Suppl 1 35 48 10.1258/1355819054308549 16053582 (Pubitemid 40993883)
52. LW Green MA George M Daniel CJ Frankish CJ Herbert WR Bowie, Study of participatory research in health promotion Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada 1994
53. Rethinking for today or rethinking for tomorrow? Preparing medicare for the future. J Lomas, HealthcarePapers 2000 1 3 32 40 discussion 8891. 12811189
54. Disseminating research. Finalizing the dissemination plan. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2006
55. Developing a tool to measure knowledge exchange outcomes. K Skinner, The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 2007 22 1 49 73
56. If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? J Knott A Wildavsky, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1980 1 4 537 578
57. Utilization of Social Science Research Knowledge in Canada. R Landry N Amara M Lamari, Res Pol 2001 30 333 349 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0 (Pubitemid 33678415)
58. Climbing the Ladder of Research Utilization: Evidence from Social Science Research. R Landry M Lamari N Amara, Science Communication 2001 22 4 396 422 10.1177/1075547001022004003 (Pubitemid 33288851)
59. Users' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: A study protocol. M-P Gagnon N Shaw C Sicotte L Mathieu Y Leduc J Duplantie J Maclean F Légaré Implementation Science 2009
60. A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol. F Légaré A Boivin T van der Weijden C Packenham S Tapp J Burgers, Implementation Science 2009
61. Listening for Direction III: Preliminary Research Theme Areas. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/34591.html