Rheology of concentrated granular suspensions and possible implications for debris flow modeling

Water Resources Research

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Sosio, Rosanna ^a   Crosta, Giovanni B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINGHAM MODELS; DEBRIS FLOW DEPOSITS; DEBRIS FLOWS; FINE SANDS; FLOW CURVES; GEOPHYSICAL FLOWS; GRAIN PARTICLES; GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; GRANULAR SUSPENSIONS; HERSCHEL-BULKLEY; PARTICLE SIZE CHANGES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIORS; RHEOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; ROTATION VELOCITIES; ROTATIONAL RHEOMETERS; SAND CONTENTS; SHEAR RATES; SHEAR THICKENINGS; SHEAR-THINNING; SOLID CONCENTRATIONS; THEOLOGICAL BEHAVIORS; TIKHONOV REGULARIZATION METHODS; VISCOSITY COEFFICIENTS;

CLAY MINERALS; DEBRIS; GRAIN SIZE AND SHAPE; RHEOLOGY; SHEAR DEFORMATION; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; VISCOSITY;

SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DEBRIS FLOW; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLOW MODELING; FRICTION; GEOPHYSICS; GRAIN SIZE; RHEOLOGY; SAND; SHEAR STRESS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 65349142592     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2008WR006920     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abbott, J. R., N. Tetlow, A. L. Graham, S. A. Altobelli, E. Fukushima, L. A. Mondy, and T. S. Stevens (1991), Experimental observations of particle migration in concentrated suspensions: Couette flow, J. Rheol. N Y, 35, 773-795, doi:10.1122/1.550157.
2. Ackerson, B. J. (1990), Shear induced order and shear processing of model hard sphere suspensions, J. Rheol. N. Y, 34, 553-590, doi:10.1122/ 1.550096.
3. Ancey, C. (2001), Role of lubricated contacts in concentrated polydisperse suspensions, J. Rheol. N. Y. 45, 1421-1439, doi:10.1122/1.1413504.
4. Ancey, C. (2005), Solving the Couette inverse problem by using a wavelet- vaguelette decomposition, J. Rheol. N. Y. 49, 441-460, doi:10.1122/ 1.1849181.
5. Ancey, C. (2007), Plasticity and geophysical flows: A review, J. Non New- tonian Fluid Mech, 142, 4-35, doi:10.1016/j.jnnfτn.2006.05.005.
6. Ancey, C, and R Coussot (1999), Transition frictionnelle/visqueuse pour une suspension granulaire, C R. Acad. Sci., Ser. II, 327, 515-522.
7. Ancey, C, and H. Jorrot (2001), Yield stress for particle suspensions within a clay dispersion, J. Rheol. N. Y. 45, 297-319, doi-.10.1122/1.1343879.
8. Banfill, P. F. G. (1991), The rheology of fresh mortar, Mag. Conor. Res., 43, 13-21.
9. Bardou, E., C. Ancey, C. Bonnard, and L. Vulliet (2003), Classification of debris-flow deposits for hazard assessment in alpine areas, in Debris Flow Mechanics and Mitigation Conference, edited by C. L. Chen and D. Rickenmann, pp. 799-808, Millpress, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
10. Barnes, H. A., and J. O. Carnali (1990), The vane-in-cup as a novel rhe- ometer geometry for shear thinning and thixotropic materials, J. Rheol. N. Y. 34, 841-866, doi:10.1122/1.550103.
11. Bames, H. A., and Q. Nguyen (2001), Rotating vane rheometry-A review, J. Non Newtonian Fluid Mech., 98, 1-14, doi:10.1016/S0377-0257(01)00095- 7.
12. Chen, H., and C. F. Lee (2003), A dynamic model for rainfall-induced landslides on natural slopes, Geomorphology, 51, 269-288, doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00224-6.
13. Coussot, P. (1997), Mudflow Rheology and Dynamics, 255 pp., Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
14. Coussot, P., and C. Ancey (1999), Rheophysical classification of concen- trated suspensions and granular pastes, Phys. Rev. E, 59, 4445-4457, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.59.4445.
15. Coussot, P., and J. M. Piau (1994), On the behavior of fine mud suspen- sions, Rheol. Acta, 33, 175-184, doi:10.1007/BF00437302.
16. Coussot, P., and J. M. Piau (1995), The effects of an addition of force-free particles on the rheological properties of fine suspensions, Can. Geotech. J., 32, 263-270, doi:10.1139/t95-028.
17. Coussot, P., A. I. Leonov, and J. M. Piau (1993), Rheology of concentrated dispersed systems in a low molecular weight matrix, J. Non Newtonian Fluid Mech., 46, 179-217, doi:10.1016/0377-0257(93)85046-D.
18. Coussot, P., D. Laigle, M. Arrattano, A. Deganutti, and L. Marchi (1998), Direct determination of rheological characteristics of debris flow, J. Hydrol. Eng., 124(8), 865-868, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:8(865).
19. Coussot, P., Q. D. Nguyen, H. T. Huynh, and D. Bonn (2002), Avalanche behavior in yield stress fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 175501, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.88.175501.
20. Coussot, P., N. Roussel, S. Jarny, and H. Chanson (2005), Continuous or catastrophic solid-liquid transition in jammed systems, Phys. Fluids, 17, 011704, doi:10.1063/l.1823531.
21. Dai, J., W. Chen, and B. Zhou (1980), An experimental study of slurry transport in pipes, in River Sedimentation, edited by B. Li, pp. 195-204, Guanghua, Beijing.
22. Elverho¡, A., D. Issler, F. V. De Blasio, T. Ilstad, C. B. Harbitz, and P. Gauer (2004), Emerging insights into the dynamics of submarine debris flows, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 633-648.
23. Griffiths, R. W. (2000), The dynamics of lava flows, Annu. Rev Fluid Mech., 32, 477-518, doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.477.
24. Haber, S., and H. Brenner (2000), Inhomogeneous viscosity fluid flow in a wide-gap Couette apparatus: Shear-induced migration in suspensions, Phys. Fluids, 12, 3100-3111, doi:10.1063/l.1320837.
25. Hampton, M. A., H. J. Lee, and J. Locat (1996), Submarine landslides, Rev. Geophys., 34, 33-59, doi:10.1029/95RG03287.
26. Herschel, W. H., and R. Bulkley (1926), Measurement of consistency as applied to rubber-benzene solution, Am. Soc. Test. Mater, 26, 621-633.
27. Imran, J., P. Harff, and G. Parker (2001), A numerical model of submarine debris-flow with graphical user interface, Comput. Geosci., 27, 717-729, doi:10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00124-2.
28. Iverson, R. M. (1997), The physics of debris flows, Rev. Geophys., 35, 245-296, doi:10.1029/97RG00426.
29. Iverson, R. M., and R. P. Denlinger (2001), Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory, J. Geophys. Res., 106(B1), 537-552, doi:10.1029/ 2000JB900329.
30. Kang, Z., and S. Zhang (1980), A preliminary analysis of the characteristics of debris flow, in River Sedimentation, edited by B. Li, pp. 225-226, Guanghua, Beijing.
31. Laigle, D., and P. Coussot (1997), Numerical modelling of mudflows, J. Hydraul. Eng., 123, 617-623, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:7(617).
32. Locat, J., and D. Demers (1988), Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships of sensitive clays, Can. Geotech. J., 25(4), 799-806, doi:10.1139/t88-088.
33. Major, J. J., and T. C. Pierson (1992), Debris flow rheology: Experimental analysis of fine-grained slurries, Water Resour. Res., 28, 841-857, doi:10.1029/91WR02834.
34. Mansoutre, S., P. Colombet, and H. Van Damme (1999), Water retention and granular rheological behavior of fresh C3S paste as a function of concentration, Cement Concr. Res., 29, 1441-1453, doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00129-5.
35. Nguyen, Q. D., and D. V. Boger (1985), Direct yield stress measurement with the vane method, J. Rheol. N. Y. 29, 335-347, doi:10.1122/ 1.549794.
36. Nott, P. R., and J. F. Brady (1994), Pressure-driven flow of suspensions: Simulation and theory, J. Fluid Mech., 275, 157-199, doi:10.1017/ S0022112094002326.
37. O'Brien, J. S., and P. Y. Julίen (1988), Laboratory analysis of mudflow properties, J. Hydraul. Eng., 114, 877-887, doi.T0.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:8(877).
38. O'Brien, J. S., P. Y. Julien, and W. T. Fullerton (1993), Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation, J. Hydraul. Eng., 119, 244-259, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(244).
39. Osipov, V. I., S. Nicolaeva, and V. N. Sokolov (1984), Microstructural changes associated with thixotropic phenomena in clay soils, Geotechni- que, 34, 293-303.
40. Phillips, C. J., and T. R. H. Davies (1991), Determining rheological proper- ties of debris flow material, Geomorphology, 4, 101-110, doi:10.1016/ 0169-555X(91)90022-3.
41. Pignon, F., A. Magnin, and J. M. Piau (1996), Thixotropic colloidal suspen- sions and flow curves with minimum: Identification of flow regimes and rheometric consequences, J. Rheol. N. Y. 40, 573-587, doi:10.1122/ 1.550759.
42. Remaitre, A., J. Malet, O. Maquaire, C. Ancey, and J. Locat (2005), Flow behaviour and runout modelling of a complex debris flow in a clay-shale basin, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 30, 479-488, doi:10.1002/ esp.l 162.
43. Schatzmann, M., P. Fischer, and G. R. Bezzola (2003), Rheological beha- vior of fine and large particle suspensions, J. Hydraul. Eng., 129, 796-803, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:10(796).
44. Sosio, R. (2007), Study of debris-flow behavior: Numerical modeling and rheological characterization through laboratory analyses and field obser- vations, Ph.D. dissertation, 153 pp., Univ. of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
45. Sosio, R., G. B. Crosta, and P. Frattini (2007), Field observations, rheolo- gical testing and numerical modeling of a debris-flow event, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 32, 290-306, doi:10.1002/esp.1391.
46. Tetlow, N., A. Graham, M. Ingber, S. Subia, L. Mondy, and S. Altobelli (1998), Particle migration in a Couette apparatus: Experiment and mod- eling, J. Rheol. N. Y. 42, 307-328, doi:10.1122/1.550954.
47. Tikhonov, A. N. (1963), Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, Engl. Transί, 4, 1035-1038.
48. Van Wazer, J. R., J. W. Lyons, R. E. Colwell, and K. Y. Kim (1963), Viscosity and Flow Measurement-A Laboratory Handbook of Rheology, Interscience, New York.
49. Yeow, Y, W. Ko, and P. Tang (2000), Solving the inverse problem of Couette viscometry by Tikhonov regularization, J. Rheol. N. Y. 44, 1335-1351, doi:10.1122/1.1308520.
50. Zhou, Z., M. J. Solomon, P. J. Scales, and D. V. Boger (1999), The yield stress of concentrated flocculated suspensions of size distributed parti- cles, J. Rheol. N. Y. 43, 651-671, doi:10.1122/1.551029.