An improved micropropagation protocol for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) isolated cotyledons

Forestry

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 175-184

  Alvarez J M ^a   Majada, J ^b   Ordas R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^b Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario de Asturias   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROUS TREE; PROPAGATION (HORTICULTURE); ROOTING; SHOOT GROWTH;

PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 65349125965     PISSN: 0015752X     EISSN: 14643626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpn052     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aitken-Christie, J., Singh, A.P. and Davies, H. 1988 Multiplication of meristematic tissue: a new tissue culture system for radiata pine. In Genetic manipulation of woody plants. I.W. Hanover and D.E. Keathley (eds). Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, pp. 413-432.
2. Alía, R. and Martín, S. 2003 Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). EUFORGEN, Rome.
3. Alonso, P., Moncaleán, P., Fernández, B., Rodríguez, A., Centeno, M.L. and Ordás, R.J. 2006 An improved micropropagation protocol for stone pine (Pinus pinea L.). Ann. For. Sci. 63, 879-885.
4. Arduini, I., Godbold, D.L. and Onnis, A. 1995 Influence of copper on root growth and morphology of Pinus pinea L. and Pinus pinaster Ait. seedlings. Tree Physiol. 15, 411-415.
5. Calixto, F. and Pais, M.S. 1997 Adventitious shoot formation and plant regeneration from Pinus pinaster Sol. ex Aiton. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant. 33, 119-124.
6. Compton, M. 1994 Statistical methods suitable for the analysis of plant tissue culture data. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 37, 217-242.
7. Danusevicius, D. and Lindgren, D. 2002 Effi ciency of selection based on phenotype, clone and progeny testing in long-term breeding. Silvae Genet. 51, 19-25.
8. David, A., David, H. and Mateille, T. 1982 In vitro adventitious budding on Pinus pinaster cotyledons and needles. Physiol. Plant. 56, 102-107.
9. Dumas, E. and Monteuuis, O. 1995 In vitro rooting of micropropagated shoots from juvenile and mature Pinus pinaster explants: infl uence of activated charcoal. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 40, 231-235.
10. Ellis, D. and Bilderback, D.E. 1989 Temporal competence of embryonic Pinus ponderosa cotyledons to form multiple buds-in vitro. Am. J. Bot. 76, 348-355.
11. Flinn, B.S., Webb, D.T. and Newcomb, W. 1989 Mor-phometric analysis of reserve substances and ultra-structural changes during determination and loss of competence of Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) cotyledons in vitro. Can. J. Bot. 67, 779-789.
12. Foster, G.S. and Shaw, D.V. 1987 A tree improvement program to develop clones of loblolly pine for reforestation. In Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference Proceedings, C.R. McKinley (ed). Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas. pp. 17-21.
13. Harvengt, L. 2005 Somatic embryogenesis in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). In Protocol of somatic embryogenesis in woody plants. S.M. Jain and P.K. Gupta (eds). Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 107-120.
14. Lelu-Walter, M.-A., Bernier-Cardou, M. and Klimasze-wska, K. 2006 Simplifi ed and improved somatic em-bryogenesis for clonal propagation of Pinus pinaster (Ait.). Plant Cell Rep 25, 767-776.
15. Majada, J. and Alía, R. 2004 Programa de conser-vación y mejora genética de Pinus pinaster. Progreso Forestal. 0, 13-18.
16. Miguel, C., Gonçalves, S., Tereso, S., Marum, L., Maroco, J. and Oliveira, M. 2004 Somatic embryogenesis from 20 open-pollinated families of Portuguese plus trees of maritime pine. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 76, 121-130.
17. Mohamed-Yasseen, Y. 2001 Infl uence of agar and activated charcoal on uptake of gibberellin and plant morphogenesis in vitro. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant. 37, 204-205.
18. Moncaleán, P., Cortizo, M., Alonso, P., Fernández, B., Rodríguez, A. and Centeno, M.L. et al. 2005 Organogenic responses of Pinus pinea cotyledons to hormonal treatments: BA metabolism and cytokinin content. Tree Physiol. 25, 1-9.
19. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. 1962 A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum. 15, 473-497.
20. Nehra, N.S., Becwar, M.R., Rottmann, W.H., Pearson, L., Chowdhury, K. and Chang, S. et al. 2005 Invited review: forest biotechnology: innovative methods, emerging opportunities. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Plant. 41, 701-717.
21. Niskanen, A.M., Lu, J., Seitz, S., Keinonen, K., Von Weissenberg, K. and Pappinen, A. 2004 Effect of parent genotype on somatic embryogenesis in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Tree Physiol. 24, 1259-1265.
22. Risser, P.G. and White, P.R. 1964 Nutritional requirements of spruce tumor cells in vitro. Physiol. Plantarum. 17, 620-635.
23. Saborio, F., Dvorak, W.S., Donahue, J.K. and Thorpe, T.A. 1997 In vitro regeneration of plantlets from mature embryos of Pinus ayacahuite. Tree Physiol. 17, 787-796.
24. Tang, W., Ouyang, F. and Guo, Z. 1998 Plant regeneration through organogenesis from callus induced from mature zygotic embryos of loblolly pine. Plant Cell Rep. 17, 557-560.
25. Tereso, S., Gonçalves, S., Marum, L., Oliveira, M., Maroco, J. and Miguel, C. 2006 Improved axillary and adventitious bud regeneration from Portuguese genotypes of Pinus pinaster Ait. Propagat Ornam Plants. 6, 24-33.
26. Trontin, J.-F., Harvengt, L., Garin, E., Lopez-Vernaza, M., Arancio, L. and Hoebeke, J. et al. 2002 Towards genetic engineering of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Ann. For. Sci. 59, 687-697.
27. Valdés, A.E., Ordás, R.J., Fernández, B. and Centeno, M.L. 2001 Relationships between hormonal contents and the organogenic response in Pinus pinea cotyledons. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 39, 377-384.
28. Von Arnold, S. and Eriksson, T. 1985 Initial stages in the course of adventitious bud formation on embryos of Picea abies. Physiol. Plantarum. 64, 41-47.
29. Wise, F.C. and Caldwell, T.D. 1994 Macropropagation of conifers by stem cuttings. In General technical report SO. G.S. Foster and A.M. Diner (eds). USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans. pp. 51-73.