Induced abortions: Still important reproduction loss in the Czech Republic?

Neuroendocrinology Letters

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 111-118

  Kocourková, Jiřina ^a   Fait, Tomáš ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Abortion; Birth regulation; Contraception; Fertility; Reproduction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH CONTROL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; CZECH REPUBLIC; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; INDUCED ABORTION; LAW; ORAL CONTRACEPTION; UNWANTED PREGNANCY;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH RATE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION GROWTH; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349121296     PISSN: 0172780X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Andersen AN, Goossens V, Gianardi L, Felberbaum R, de Nouzon J, Nygren KG (2007). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction 22 (6): 1513-1525.
2. Fait T, Sulova L, Jenicek J., Uzel R (2008). The wide acces to contraception is the best way to downregulation of abortion rate. Eur J Contracep Repr 13 (Suppl 2): 54.
3. Frejka, T (2008). Birth regulation in Europe: Completing the contraceptive revolution, http://www.demographic-research.org. 19 (5): 73-84.
4. Kocourková J (2007). Potratovost [(Abortion)]. In: Fialová L, editor. Populační vývoj ČR 2007. (In Czech.) Faculty of Science. Charles University, p.39-43.
5. Kučera T, Mardešić T, Žáčková T (2005). Úspěšnost mimotělního oplodnění a demografické aspekty neplodnosti v ČR. [(Successfulness of in vitro fertilisation and demographic aspects of infertility in CR.)] (In Czech.) Sanquis. 39: 34.
6. Medoff MH (2007). Price, Restrictions and Abortion Demand. J Fam Econ Iss. 20: 583-599.
7. Medoff MH (2008). The spillover Effects of Restrictive Abortion Laws. Gend Issues. 25:1-10.
8. Melgalve I, Lazdane G, Trapenciere I, Shannon C, Bracken H, Winikoff B. (2005). Knowledge and attitudes about abortion legislation and abortion methods among abortion clients in Latvia. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.10 (3): 143-150.
9. Pinter B, Aubeny E, Bartfai G, Loeber O, Ozalp S, Webb A (2005). Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.10 (1): 51-58.
10. Sobotka T, Hansen MA, Jensen TK, Pedersen AT, Lutz W, Skakkebaek NE (2008a). Population and Development Review. 34 (1): 79-101.
11. Sobotka T, Št'astná A, Zeman K, Hamplova D, Kantorová V (2008b). Czech Republic: A rapid transformation of fertility and family behaviour after the collapse of state socialism. http://www.demographic-research.org. 19 (14): 403-454.
12. Stloukal L (1999). Understanding the "abortion culture" in Central and Eastern Europe. In: David HP, editor. From abortion to Contraception: A Resource to Public Policies and Reproductive Behaviour in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the Present. Westport Connecticut: Greenwood Press, p.23-37.
13. ÚZIS, (2007). Abortions CR 2007.
14. Van de Kaa, DJ (2002). Is low fertility post-modern and beyond the action of governments? In: Macura M Beets G, editors. Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe. Volume I. UN New York and Geneva, p.13-16.
15. Van de Kaa, DJ (1997). Option and Sequences: Europe's Demographic Patterns. Nethur-Demography Paper No. 39.
16. Vignon J (2005). Responses to the new demographics: present and future strategies for the European Union. In: Macura M McDonald AL Haug W, editors. The New Demographic Regime. Population Challenges and Policy Responses. UN New York and Geneva, p.45-56.
17. Wrobel B, Karasek M (2008). Human sexuality and sex steroids. Neuroendocrinology Letters 29 (1):3-10.