|
|
Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2009, Pages
|
|
Do surgical personnel really need to double-glove?
a
a
Ansell
(United States)
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
BIOENGINEERING;
DISEASE TRANSMISSION;
EQUIPMENT;
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE;
HUMAN;
INFECTION CONTROL;
MATERIALS TESTING;
MECHANICAL STRESS;
METHODOLOGY;
NEEDLESTICK INJURY;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
NURSING ORGANIZATION;
OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT;
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH;
OPERATING ROOM PERSONNEL;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
REVIEW;
RISK FACTOR;
STANDARD;
SURGICAL GLOVE;
TIME;
UNITED STATES;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE;
GLOVES, SURGICAL;
HUMAN ENGINEERING;
HUMANS;
INFECTION CONTROL;
INFECTIOUS DISEASE TRANSMISSION, PATIENT-TO-PROFESSIONAL;
MATERIALS TESTING;
NEEDLESTICK INJURIES;
NURSE'S ROLE;
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH;
OPERATING ROOM NURSING;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;
RISK FACTORS;
SOCIETIES, NURSING;
STRESS, MECHANICAL;
TIME FACTORS;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 65349121184
PISSN: 00012092
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.11.001 Document Type: Note |
|
Times cited : (12)
|
|
References (25)
|
