Comparing the Pension Promises of 30 OECD Countries

International Social Security Review

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 49-77

  Queisser, Monika ^a   Whitehouse, Edward ^a  

^a OECD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65349115461     PISSN: 0020871X     EISSN: 1468246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2006.00247.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Casey, B.; Oxley, H.; Whitehouse, E. R.; Antolín, P.; Duval, R.; Leibfritz, W. 2003. Policies for an ageing society: Recent measures and areas for further reform (Economics Department Working Paper No. 369). Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
2. Cichon, M. 1999. “Notional defined-contribution schemes: Old wine in new bottles?”, in International Social Security Review, Vol. 52, No. 4.
3. Dang, T. T.; Antolín, P.; Oxley, H. 2001. Fiscal implications of ageing: Projections of age-related spending (Economics Department Working Paper No. 305). Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
4. Disney, R. F. 1999. Notional accounts as a pension reform strategy: An evaluation (Pension Reform Primer Series, Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 9928). Washington, DC, World Bank.
5. Hernanz, V.; Malherbert, F.; Pellizzari, M. 2004. Take-up of welfare benefits in OECD countries: A review of the evidence (Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 17). Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
6. Keenay, G.; Whitehouse, E. R. 2002. “Taxing pensioners”, in Taxing wages. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
7. Keenay, G.; Whitehouse, E. R. 2003. “The role of the personal tax system in old-age support: A survey of 15 countries”, in Fiscal Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1.
8. OECD. 2001. Ageing and income: Financial resources and retirement in nine OECD countries. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
9. OECD. 2003. Taxing wages. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
10. OECD. 2005. Pensions at a glance: Public policies across OECD countries. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Develop ment.
11. Palacios, R. J.; Whitehouse, E. R. 2005. Civil-service pension schemes around the world (Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper). Washington, DC, World Bank.
12. Vordring, H.; Goudswaard, K. 1997. “Indexation of public pension benefits on a legal basis: Some experiences in European countries”, in International Social Security Review, Vol. 50, No. 3.
13. Whiteford, P. 1995. “The use of replacement rates in international comparisons of benefit systems”, in International Social Security Review, Vol. 48, No. 2.
14. Whitehouse, E. R. 2000. “Administrative charges for funded pensions: Measurement concepts, international comparison and assessment”, in Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, Vol. 120, No. 3.
15. Whitehouse, E. R. 2001. “Administrative charges for funded pensions: Comparison and assessment of 13 countries”, in Administrative costs and reforms (Private Pensions Series, No. 2). Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.