Effect of data standardization on chemical clustering and similarity searching

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 155-161

  Chu, Chia Wei ^a   Holliday, John D ^a   Willett, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; STANDARDIZATION;

DATA STANDARDIZATION; DEGREE OF CLUSTERING; MOLECULAR HOLOGRAMS; PERFORMANCE BENEFITS; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS; SIMILARITY CALCULATION; SIMILARITY SEARCH; SIMILARITY SEARCHING;

K-MEANS CLUSTERING;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 65249191435     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci800224h     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gasteiger, J.; Engel, T. Chemoinformatics: A Textbook; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003.
2. Leach, A. R.; Gillet, V. J. An Introduction to Chemoinformatics, 2nd ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 2007.
3. Willett, P. Similarity Methods in Chemoinformatics. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3-71.
4. Johnson, M. A.; Maggiora, G. M. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity; John Wiley: New York, 1990.
5. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
6. Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K. Why do we Need so many Chemical Similarity Search Methods. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 903-911.
7. Glen, R. C.; Adams, S. E. Similarity Metrics and Descriptor Spaces -which Combinations to Choose. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2006, 25, 1133-1142.
8. Kettenring, J. R. The Practice of Cluster Analysis. J. Classif. 2006, 23, 3-30.
9. Milligan, G. W.; Cooper, M. C. A Study of Standardization of Variables in Cluster Analysis. J. Classif. 1988, 5, 181-204.
10. Strike, K.; El-Emam, K.; Madhavji, N. Software Cost Estimation with Incomplete Data. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001, 27, 890-907.
11. Doherty, K. A. J.; Adams, R. G.; Davey, N. In Non-Euclidean norms and data normalisation, ESANN' 2004 - European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks; Bruges (Belgium), 2004; Bruges (Belgium), 2004; pp 181-186.
12. Dorans, N. J.; Kulick, E. Demonstrating the Utility of the Standardization Approach to Assessing Unexpected Differential Item Performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. J. Educ. Meas. 1986, 23, 355-368.
13. Creaser, C. Comparing Performance of Service Points in Public Libraries. Performance Meas. Metrics 2001, 2, 109-135.
14. Gnanadesikan, R.; Tsao, S. L.; Kettenring, J. R. Weighting and Selection of Variables for Cluster Analysis. J. Classif. 1995, 12, 113- 136.
15. Bath, P. A.; Morris, C. A.; Willett, P. Effect of Standardisation on Fragment-Based Measures of Structural Similarity. J. Chemom. 1993, 7, 543-550.
16. Turner, D. B.; Willett, P.; Ferguson, A.; Heritage, T. W. Similarity Searching in Files of Three-Dimensional Chemical Structures: Evaluation of Similarity Coefficients and Standardisation Methods for Fieldbased Similarity Searching. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1995, 3, 101-130.
17. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of Fingerprint-Based Methods for Virtual Screening Using Multiple Bioactive Reference Structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1177-1185.
18. Pipeline Pilot; Accelrys Software Inc.: San Diego CA, 2008.
19. Molconn-Z; eduSoft LC: Ashland VA, 2008.
20. Unity; Tripos Inc.: St Louis MO, 2008.
21. Downs, G. M.; Barnard, J. M. Clustering Methods and their Uses in Computational Chemistry. Rev. Comput. Chem. 2002, 18, 1-40.
22. Clustering Toolkit; Digital Chemistry Ltd.: Harewood, U.K., 2008.
23. Edgar, S. J.; Holliday, J. D.; Willett, P. Effectiveness of Retrieval in Similarity Searches of Chemical Databases: A Review of Performance Measures. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2000, 18, 343-357.
24. Truchon, J.-F.; Bayly, C. I. Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the "Early Recognition" Problem. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 488-508.
25. Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. Differential Shannon Entropy as a Sensitive Measure of Differences in Database Variability of Molecular Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1060-1066.
26. Siegel, S.; Castellan, N. J. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988.