Selective advantage for III M males over Y M males in cage competition, mating competition, and pupal emergence in musca domestwa L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 499-504

  Hamm, Ronda L ^a   Gao, Jian Rong ^a   Lin, George Guan Hua ^a   Scott, Jeffrey G ^a  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

Fitness; Isogenic strain; M factor; Sex determination

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; EMERGENCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; FLY; PUPA; SEX DETERMINATION; SPERM COMPETITION;

DIPTERA; MUSCA DOMESTICA; MUSCIDAE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GENDER AND SEX; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HOUSE FLY; INSECT; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; TEMPERATURE;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GENOTYPE; HOUSEFLIES; MALE; PUPA; SEX DETERMINATION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 65249185016     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0225     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bryant, E. H. 1980. Geographic variation in components of mating success of the housefly, Musca domestica L., in the United States. Am. Nat. 116: 655-669.
2. D) in housefly (Musca domestica) populations in Turkey. Turkish J. Zool. 23: 73-77.
3. Cakir, S., and A. Kence. 1999. Competition between strains with autosomal and standard sex-determining mechanisms in the housefly (Muscidae). Turkish J. Zool 23: 79-84.
4. Denholm, I., M. G. Franco, P. G. Rubini, and M. Vecchi. 1985. Geographical variation in house-fly (Musca domestica L.) sex determinants within the British Isles. Genet. Res. Camb. 47: 19-27.
5. Denholm, I., P. G. Rubini, C. Rovati, and M. Vecchi. 1990. Genetic basis of sex determination in two South African strains of house fly. South Afr. J. Sci. 86: 41-43.
6. Franco, M. G., P. G. Rubini, and M. Vecchi. 1982. Sexdeterminants and their distribution in various populations of Musca domestica L. of Western Europe. Genet. Res. Camb. 40: 279-293.
7. Gao, J.-R., J. M. Deacutis, and J. G. Scott. 2007. Characterization of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit gene Mda2 from the housefly, Musca domestica. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 64: 30-42.
8. M in the house fly, Musca domestica L., under field and laboratory conditions. Genet. Res. Camb. 90: 493-498.
9. Hamm,R. L., and J. G.Scott. 2009. A high frequency of male determining factors in male Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) from Ipswich, Australia. J. Med. Entomol. 46: 169-172.
10. Hamm, R., T. Shono, and J. G. Scott. 2005. A cline in frequency of autosomal males is not associated with insecticide resistance in house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 171-176.
11. Hartl, D. L., and A.G. Clark. 2007. Principles of population genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
12. Hiroyoshi, T. 1964. Sex-limited inheritance and abnormal sex ratio in strains of the housefly. Genetics 50: 373-385.
13. M-type strain of the housefly. Jpn. J. Genet. 57: 231-239.
14. Keiding, J. 1986. The house fly: biology and control. WHO Vector Control Ser. 63: 60.
15. Kozielska, M., B. Feldmeyer, I. Pen, F. J. Weissing, and L. W. Beukeboom. 2008. Are autosomal sex-determining factors of the housefly (Musca domestica) spreading north? Genet. Res. Camb. 90: 157-165.
16. Liu, N., and X. Yue. 2001. Genetics of pyrethroid resistance in a strain (ALHF) of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 70: 151-158.
17. McDonald, I. C, D. E. Overland, R. A. Leopold, M. E. Degrugillier, P. B. Morgan, and H. C. Hofmann. 1975. Genetics of house flies: variability studies with North Dakota, Texas, and Florida populations. J. Hered. 66: 137-140.
18. Rinkevich, F. D., L. Zhang, R. L. Hamm, S. G. Brady, B. P. Lazzaro, and J. G. Scott. 2006. Frequencies of the pyrethroid resistance alleles of Vsscl and CYP6D1 in house flies from the eastern United States. Insect Molec. Biol. 15: 157-167.
19. Shono, T., and J. G. Scott. 1990. Autosomal sex-associated pyrethroid resistance in a strain of house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) with a male-determining factor on chromosome three. J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 686-689.
20. Shono, T., and J. G. Scott. 2003. Spinosad resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica, is due to a recessive factor on autosome 1. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 75: 1-7.
21. Tomita, T., and Y. Wada. 1989. Multifactorial sex determination in natural populations of the housefly (Musca domestica) in Japan. Jpn. J. Genet. 64: 373-382. Received 17 July 2008; accepted 16 December 2008.