Early intervening for students with speech sound disorders: Lessons from a school district

Communication Disorders Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 155-166

  Mire, Stephen P ^a   Montgomery, Judy K ^b  

^a Terrebonne Parish School System   (United States)

^b CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Early intervening; Prevention; RTI; Service delivery in schools; Speech sound disorders

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL SERVICE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH DISORDER; STUDENT;

EID: 65249159586     PISSN: 15257401     EISSN: 15384837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525740108326593     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2000). Guidelines for the roles and responsibilities of school based speech language pathologists. Rockville, MD: Author.
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007). Response to intervention, A position paper. Rockville, MD: Author.
3. Assistance to States for the Education of Children With Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children With Disabilities, 71 Fed. Reg. 46,540 (Aug. 14, 2006) (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. pts. 300 and 301).
4. Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., & Francis, D. (2006). An evaluation of intensive interventions for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447-466.
5. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. a§ 1400 et seq. (reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1990).
6. Irwin, J.V., Huskey, R., Knight, N., & Oltman, S. (1974). A longitudinal study of the spontaneous remission of articulatory defects of 1,665 school children in Grades 1, 2, and 3. Acta Symbolica, 5, 1-17.
7. Justice, L. (2006). Evidenced-based practice, response to intervention, and the prevention of reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 284-297.
8. Kamhi, A. (2006). Treatment decision for children with speech-sound disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 271-279.
9. Mire, S. (2007 a). Workload analysis: IEP time and group size factors in calculating workload. ASHA Division 16: Perspectives on School Based Issues, 8, 18-20.
10. Mire, S. (2007 b, February). Articulation intervention. Paper presented at the South Carolina Speech Language Hearing Association Convention, Hilton Head, SC.
11. Montgomery, J.K. (2007). Models of RTI for SLPs. Retrieved January 15, 2008 from http://www.speechpathology.com/ceus/livecoursedetails.asp?class-id= 2756
12. Moore-Brown, B.J., Montgomery, J.K., Bielinski, J., & Shubin, J. (2005). Response to intervention: Teaching instead of testing help to avoid labeling. Topics in Language Disorders, 25 (2). 148-167. (Pubitemid 41152386)
13. National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. (2008). Homepage. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from www.studentprogress.org
14. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities (NAS-DSE and CASE White Paper on RTI). Alexandria, VA: Author.
15. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq.
16. Secord, W., & Shine, R. (2003). S-CAT. Greenville, SC: Super Duper Publications.
17. Shriberg, L.D., & Kent, R.D. (1995). Clinical phonetics (2 nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18. Smit, A.B., Hand, L., Frelinger, J.J., Bernthal, J., & Bird, A. (1990). The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 779-798. (Pubitemid 20376232)
19. Staskowski, M. (2006). Response to intervention: A new system for prevention and identification. ASHA Division 16: Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 7 (3). 10-16.
20. Taps, J. (2006). An innovative educational approach for addressing articulation differences. ASHA Division 16: Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 7 (4). 7-10.