The impact of compliant surfaces on in-hospital chest compressions: Effects of common mattresses and a backboard

Resuscitation

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 546-552

  Noordergraaf, Gerrit J ^a,c   Paulussen, Igor W F ^a,b   Venema, Alyssa ^c   van Berkom, Paul F J ^c   Woerlee, Pierre H ^b   Scheffer, Gert J ^c   Noordergraaf, Abraham ^d  

^a Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Basic life support (BLS); Cardiac massage; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); Chest compliance; In hospital; Manikin; Mattress

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACKBOARD; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HAND MOVEMENT; HEART MASSAGE; HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT; MATTRESS; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION;

BEDS; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; COMPLIANCE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; MANIKINS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); THORACIC WALL;

EID: 65249145261     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Perkins G.D., and Soar J. In hospital cardiac arrest: missing links in the chain of survival. Resuscitation 66 (2005) 253-255
2. Nolan J.P., Deakin C.D., Soar J., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 67S1 (2005) S39-S86
3. Spice C., Bowker L., and Stewart K. Long-term survival after in-hospital CPR. Resuscitation 49 (2001) 207-208
4. Clement F. Does the time of day and where the event takes place have any influence on survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 70 (2006) 304
5. Abella B.S., Alvarado J.P., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 293 (2005) 305-310
6. Abella B.S., Edelson D.P., Kim S., et al. CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation 73 (2007) 54-61
7. Steen P.A., and Kramer-Johansen J. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality to ensure survival. Curr Opin Crit Care 14 (2008) 299-304
8. Olvasveengen T.M., Wik L., and Steen P.A. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and during transport in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 76 (2008) 185-190
9. Price M.F., and Stevens H. The effect of pressure reducing mattresses in CPR. Nursing Stand. 13 (1998) 64
10. Andersen L.O., Isbyte D.L., and Rasmussen L.S. Increasing compression depth during manikin CPR using a simple backboard. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51 (2007) 747-750
11. Cullum N, McInnes E, Bell-Syer SE, Legood R. Support surface for pressure ulcer prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 1004:CD001735.
12. Beghe C. Review: foam-based, constant low-pressure mattresses are better than standard hospital mattresses for reducing pressure ulcers. ACP J Club 142 (2005) 8
13. Reddy M, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA 1006;296:974-84.
14. Tweed M.J., Tweed C., and Perkins G.D. The effect of differing support surfaces on the efficacy of chest compressions using a resuscitation manikin model. Resuscitation 51 (2001) 179-183
15. Perkins G.D., Benny R., Giles S., et al. Do different mattresses affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation?. Int Care Med 29 (2003) 2330-2335
16. Perkins G.D., Smith C.M., Augre C., et al. Effects of backboard, bed height and operator position on compression depth during simulated resuscitation. Int Care Med 32 (2006) 1632-1635
17. Perkins G.D., Kocierz L., Smith S.C.L., et al. Compression feedback devices over estimate chest compression depth when performed on a bed. Resuscitation 80 (2009) 79-82
18. Handley A.J., Koster R., Monsieurs K., et al. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for Resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 67S1 (2005) S7-S23
19. Zatsiorsky V., and Seluyanov V. The mass and inertia characteristics of the main segments of the human body. In: Matsui H. (Ed). Biomechanics VIII: Proceedings of the eighth international congress of biomechanics. Nagoya, Japan (1983), Human Kinetics Publishers Champaign Il
20. Perkins G.D., Boyle W., Bridgestock H., et al. Quality of CPR during advanced resuscitation training. Resuscitation 77 (2008) 69-74
21. Noordergraaf GJ, Drinkwaard B, WPM, Berkom PFJ, et al. The quality of chest compressions by trained personnel: the effect of feedback, via the CPREzy, in a randomized controlled trial using a manikin model, Resuscitation 2006;69:241-52.
22. Leary M., and Abella B.S. The challenge of CPR quality: improvement in the real world. Resuscitation 77 (2008) 1-3
23. van B.P., Noordergraaf G.J., Scheffer G.J., and Noordergraaf A. Does use of the CPREzy involve more work than CPR without feedback?. Resuscitation 78 (2008) 66-70
24. Boe J.M., and Babbs C.F. Mechanics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a patient on a soft vs a hard surface. Acad Emerg Med. 6 (1999) 754-757
25. Babbs C.F., Voorhees W.D., Fitzgerald K.R., et al. Relationship of blood pressure and flow during CPR to chest compression amplitude: evidence for an effective compression threshold. Ann Emerg Med 12 (1983) 527-532
26. Jäntti H, Silfast A. Turpeinen A, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikins: on the floor and in bed (abstract AP-030). Resuscitation, doi:10.1016/2008.03.148, S48-S60.
27. Tomlinson A.J., Nyssaether J., Kramer-Johansen J., et al. Compression force-depth relationship during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 72 (2007) 364-370
28. Handley A.J., Koster R., Monsiuers K., et al. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 67S1 (2005) S7-S23