Pantograph aerodynamic effects on the pantograph-catenary interaction

Vehicle System Dynamics

Volumn 44, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages 560-570

  Bocciolone, M ^a   Resta, F ^a   Rocchi, D ^a   Tosi, A ^a   Collina, A ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aerodynamics; Collector profile; Pantograph catenary interaction; Turbulence

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS; AERODYNAMIC EFFECTS; AERODYNAMIC FORCES; COLLECTOR PROFILE; CONTACT FORCES; CURRENT COLLECTIONS; DRAG AND LIFT FORCES; DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS; DYNAMIC VARIATIONS; INCOMING FLOWS; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; PANTOGRAPH-CATENARY INTERACTION; QUASI-STEADY THEORIES; SIMULATION MODELS; TRAIN SPEED; WIND TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS; WIND TURBULENCES;

AERODYNAMICS; DUST COLLECTORS; FLOW SIMULATION; OPEN CHANNEL FLOW; PANTOGRAPHS; TURBULENCE;

ELECTRIC CURRENT COLLECTION;

EID: 65249131124     PISSN: 00423114     EISSN: 17445159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00423110600875484     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Reinbold, M., Deckacrt, U. and Famos, U., 1996, Ein programm zur Simulation von Oberleitunen und Stromabnehemern. ZEV-Glasers Annalen, 120(H.6), 239-243.
2. Brodkorb, A. and Semrau, M., 1993, Simulatonsmodell des Systems Oberleitungskettenwerk und Stromabnehemern. eb-Elecktrische Bahnen, 91, 105-113.
3. Bruni, S. and Collina, A., 2002, Numerical simulation of pantograph overhead equipment interaction. Vehicle System Dynamics, 38(4), 261-292 (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger).
4. Poetsch, G. and Baldauf,W., 2001, Simulation derWechselwirkung zwischen Stromabnehemer und Oberleitung. eb-Elecktrische Bahnen, 99, 386-392.
5. Shimian, M. and Fujii,Y., 1997, The most suitable structure of contact wire on overlap sections of Shinkansen lines. Proceedings of the WCRR '97, Vol. C, Florence, Italy, 281-286.
6. Carillo, D., Collina, A., Facchinetti, A., Fossati, F., Papi, M. and Resta, F., 2001, Application of EKF to the estimation of contact forces in pantograph-catenary system, Paper presented at the WCRR'01, Köln, De, 25-29 November.
7. Scott, G.A., 1992, High speed current collection - system sensitivity, Paper presented at the High Speed Current Collection Seminar S079, IMechE, Railway Division.
8. Schmidt, P., Schulz, H., Berthold, G. and Kiessling, F., 2001,Windwirkung auf Oberleitungs-Kettenwerke. eb-Elecktrische Bahnen, 99(9), 378-384.
9. Stickland, M.T., Scanlon, T.J., Craighead, A. and Fernandez, J., 2003, An investigation into the mechanical damping characteristic of catenary contact wires and their effect on aerodynamic galloping instability. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 217, 63-71.
10. Diana, G., Bocciolone, M., Collina, A., Papi, M. andVioli, A.G., 1999, Optimization of a new catenary by means of measurements and simulation of pantograph catenary interaction. Paper presented at the WCRR 99, Tokio, Japan, October.
11. Diana, G., Cheli, F., Collina, A., Bruni, S. and Larose, G., 1993, Comparison between wind tunnel test on a full aeroelastic model of proposed Messina Bridge and numerical results (Part II), Paper presented at the APSOWE III, Hong Kong, Japan, December.
12. Diana, G., Bruni, S., Collina,A., Fossati, F. and Resta, F., 1998, High speed railways pantograph and overhead line modelling and simulation. Paper presented at the Comprail 98, Lisbona, Portugal, 2-4 November, p. 847-856.
13. Pfinzenmaier, E., King, W.F. and Christ, D., 1985, Untersuchung zur aerodynamischen und aeroakustischen Optimierung eines Stromabnehmer für den ICE. AET, 49 45-52.
14. Iwamoto, K. and Higashi, A., 1993, Some consideration towards reducing aerodynamic noise on pantograph. Japanese Railway Engineering, 122, 1-4.
15. Pupi, M., 1998, Personal communication, Trenitalia S.p.a.