Enhancing abnormal events management by the use of quantitative process hazards analysis results

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 3921-3933

  Yélamos, Ignacio ^a   Bojarski, Aarón ^a   Joglekar, Girish ^b   Venkatasubramanian, Venkat ^b   Puigjaner, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPEN DYNAMICS; CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; FAULT DIAGNOSIS; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORKS; INTEGRATED SYSTEMS; KEY VARIABLES; PROCESS HAZARDS ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATIONS; SOUR WATERS; SUPPORTING SYSTEMS; SUPPORTING TOOLS;

INTEGRATED OPTICS; MATLAB;

STRIPPING (DYES);

EID: 65249120232     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie800405n     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Venkatasubramanian, V.; Rengaswamy, R.; Yin, K.; Kavuri, S. N. A Review of Process Fault Detection and Diagnosis - Part I, II, and III. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27, 293-347.
2. Vaidhyanathan, R.; Venkatasubramanian, V. Digraph-based Models for Automated HAZOP Analysis. J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 1995, 50, 33-49.
3. Ruiz, D. Fault diagnosis in chemical plants integrated to the information system. Ph.D. Thesis. Chem. Eng. Department, Univ. Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 2001.
4. Eizenberg, S.; Shacham, M.; Brauner, N. Combining HAZOP with dynamic simulation- Applications for safety education. J. Loss PRevent. Process Ind. 2006, 19, 754-761.
5. Dash, S.; Venkatasubramanian, V. An Integrated Framework for Abnormal Event Management and Process Hazards Analysis. AIChE J. 2003, 49, 124-139.
6. Lawley, H. G. Operability and Hazard analysis. Chem. Eng. Progress. 1974, 70, 45-56.
7. Kletz, T. A., HAZOP & HAZAN. The Institute of Chemical Engineers: Rugby, U.K., 1999.
8. Yélamos, I.; Méndez, C; Puigjaner, L. Enhancing Data Reconciliation Performance Through Time Delays Identification. Chem. Eng. Process. 2007, 46, 1251-1263.
9. Kourti, T. J. F. MacGregor. Process Analysis Monitoring and Diagnosis Using Multivariate Projection Methods. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 28, 3-21.
10. Neogi, D.; Schlags, C. E. Multivariate Statistical Analysis of an Emulsion Batch process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 3971-3978.
11. Yoon, S.; MacGregor, J. F. Statistical and Causal Model-Based Approach to Fault Detection and Isolation. AIChE J. 2000, 46, 1813-1824.
12. Musulin, E.; Yélamos, I.; Puigjaner, L. Integration of Principal Component Analysis and Fuzzy Logic Systems for Comprehensive Process Fault Detection and Diagnosis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 1739-1750.
13. Gillet, J. E. Hazard Study and Risk Assessment in the Pharmaceutical Industry; Interpharm Press Inc.: Buffalo Grove, IL, 1997; pp 102-112.
14. Vaidhyanathan, R., A Model-Based Framework for Automating HAZOP Analysis of Continuous Process Plants. Ph.D. Thesis. Purdue University, IN, 1995.
15. Thiele, R.; Brettschneider, O.; Repke, J. H.; Thielert, H.; Wozny, G. Experimental Investigations of Foaming in a Packed Tower for Sour Water Stripping. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 1426-1432.
16. Chevron Products Co. WWT Two-Stage Sour Water Stripping. Improved Performance of Sulfur Recovery Units, 1998, www.chevron.com/ products/prodserv/refiningtechnology/documents/wwt.pdf.
17. Lee, S. Y.; Lee, J. M.; Lee, D; Lee, I. B. Improvement in Steam Stripping of Sour Water through and Industrial-Scale Simulation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2004, 21 (3), 549-555.
18. Aspen Dynamics Reference Guide, version 2006; AspenTech: Burlington, MA, 2006.
19. Vedam, H.; Venkatasubramanian, V. PCA-SDG-based process monitoring and fault diagnosis. Control Eng. Pract. 1999, 903-917.