Factor structure and reliability of the dutch version of seven scales of the communication profile for the hearing impaired (CPHI)

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 454-464

  Mokkink, Lidwine B ^a   Knol, Dirk L ^a   Zekveld, Adriana A ^a   Goverts, S Theo ^a   Kramer, Sophia E ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired (CPHI); Factor Analysis; Internal Consistency; Measurement Error; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RATING SCALE; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE TESTS; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 65249105507     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/08-0036)     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barrenas, M. L., & Holgers, K. M. (2000). A clinical evaluation of the Hearing Disability and Handicap Scale in men with noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health, 2, 67-78.
2. Binzer, S. M. (2000). Self-assessment with the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired: Pre-and post-cochlear implantation. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 33, 91-114.
3. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
5. Crowley, H. J., & Nabelek, I. V. (1996). Estimation of client-assessed hearing aid performance based upon unaided variables. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 19-27.
6. De Vet, H. C. W., Ader, H. J., Terwee, C. B., & Pouwer, F. (2005). Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1203-1218.
7. De Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). When to use agreement versus reliability measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1033-1039.
8. Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1986). Scale composition and item analysis ofthe Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 515-535.
9. Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1987). Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 129-143.
10. Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1988). Retest stability of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Ear and Hearing, 9, 237-242.
11. Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1989). Factor structure of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 541-549.
12. Erdman, S. A. (2006). Clinical interpretation of the CPHI. Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation, 7, 3-18.
13. Erdman, S. A., & Demorest, M. E. (1998). Adjustment to hearing impairment. I: Description of a heterogeneous clinical population. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 107-122.
14. Garstecki, D. C., & Erler, S. F. (1996). Older adult performance on the communication profile for the hearing impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 28-42.
15. Garstecki, D. C., & Erler, S. F. (1999). Older adult performance on the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired: Gender difference. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 785-796.
16. Gatehouse, S. (2000). The impact of measurement goals on the design specification for outcome measures. Ear and Hearing, 21, 100S-105S.
17. Hallberg, L. R., Eriksson-Mangold, M., & Carlsson, S. G. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of a Swedish version of the Communication Strategies scale of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 666-674.
18. Hallberg, L. R., Hallberg, U., & Kramer, S. E. (2008). Self-reported hearing difficulties, communication strategies, and psychological general well-being (quality of life) in patients with acquired hearing impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 203-212.
19. Helvik, A. S., Jacobsen, G., & Hallberg, L. R. (2006). Psychological well-being of adults with acquired hearing impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 535-545.
20. Helvik, A. S., Thurmer, H., Jacobsen, G. W., Bratt, M., & Hallberg, L. R. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of a Norwegian version of the Communication Strategies scale of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 513-520.
21. Hyde, M. L. (2000). Reasonable psychometric standards for self-report outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation. Ear and Hearing, 21, 24S-36S.
22. Jerram, J. C. K., & Purdy, S. C. (1999). Measuring personal adjustment to hearing loss using a shortened version of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Australian Journal of Audiology, 21, 1-8.
23. Knutson, J. F., & Lansing, C. R. (1990). The relationship between communication problems and psychological difficulties in persons with profound acquired hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 656-664.
24. Kramer, S. E., Kapteyn, T. S., Festen, J. M., & Tobi, H. (1995). Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiology, 34, 311-320.
25. Lohr, K. N., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Burnam, M. A., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E. B., et al. (1996). Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria. Clinical Therapeutics, 18, 979-992.
26. McGraw, K., & Wong, S. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46.
27. Muthén,B.O., &Muthén, L. (2004). Mplus 3.1 user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
28. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation ofthe poly-choric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443-460.
30. Streiner, D. L. (1994). Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 135-140.
31. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
32. Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12, 58-79.