Hydraulic optimization of a combined sewer overflow (CSO) storage facility using numerical and physical modeling

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 363-373

  Heand, Cheng ^a   Marsalek, Jiri ^a  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

CFD; CSO; Flow patterns; Hydrodynamics; Numerical models; Scale models; Three dimensional flow

Indexed keywords

CFD; CSO; NUMERICAL MODELS; SCALE MODELS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW;

COMBINED SEWERS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW PATTERNS; FLUID DYNAMICS; HYDRAULICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SEWER NETWORK; STORAGE; STORMWATER; THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 65249100718     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/S08-050     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Averill, D., Chessie, P., Henry, D., Kok, S., Marsalek, J., and Seto, P.. Field experience with chemically-aided settling of combined sewer overflows. In Proceedings of the Novatech 2001 Conference on Innovative Technologies in Urban Drainage. Vol. 1, pp. 237-244.
2. Harwood, R., and Saul, A.J. 1999. The influence of CSO chamber size on particle retention efficiency performance. In Proceedings of the 8th ICUSD. 30 Aug. - 3 Sept., Sydney, Australia. 1-9.
3. He, C., Marsalek. J., and Rochfort, Q. 2004. Numerical modeling of enhancing suspended solids removal in a CSO facility. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada, 39(4): 457-465.
4. He, C., Marsalek, J., Rochfort, Q., and Krishnappan, B.C. 2006. Case study: refinement of hydraulic operation of a complex CSO storage/treatment facility by numerical and physical modeling. J. Hydraul. Eng. 132(2): 131-139. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9429(2006) 132:2(131).
5. Hrabak, D.. Pryl, K., Richardson, J., and Zeman. E. 1999. 3-Dimensional modeling- A new tool for the evaluation of CSO hydraulic performance. In Proceeding of the 8th ICUSD, 30 Aug. ......3 Sept., Sydney, Australia, pp. 928-933.
6. Li, J., Dhanvantari. S., Averill. D. and Biswas, N. 2003. Windsor combined sewer overflow treatability study with chemical coagulation. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada. 38: 317-334.
7. Metcalf and Eddy. 2003. Wastewater engineering: Treatment and reuse. 4th ed. McGraw Hill, Toronto, Ont.
8. Pollert, J. 1999. Free surface modeling in sewer system. In Proceedings of the 5th Fluent User Conference, 14-15 October, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 61-69.
9. Pollert, J., and Stransky, D. 2003. Combination of computational techniques- Evaluation of CSO efficiency for suspended solids separation. Water Sci. Technol. 47(4): 157-166.
10. Saul, A.J., and Ellis, D.R. 1992. Sediment deposition in storage tanks. Water Sci. Technol. 25(8): 189-198.
11. TM hydrodynamic separator using 3D mathematical model fluent. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, UK.
12. Weatherbe. D.G., and Sherbin. I.G. 1994. Urban drainage control demonstration program of Canada's Great Lakes Cleanup Fund. Water Sci. Technol. 29(1-2): 455-462.
13. Wood, J., He, C., Rochfort, Q., Marsalek. J., Seto, P., Yang, M., Chessis, P., and Kok, S. 2005. High rate stormwater clarification with polymeric flocculant addition. Water Sci. Technol. 51(2): 79-88. PMID: 15790231.
14. Wood, J. 2006. North Toronto combined sewer overflow storage tank facility flocculant treatment study final report. A report submitted to the City of Toronto, the Great Lakes Sustainability Fund and Environment Canada.
15. XCG Consultants. 2004. Combined sewer overflow treatment technologies manual. A report submitted to the Great Lakes Sustainability Fund. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ont.