Topological fragment index for the analysis of molecular substructures and their topological environment in active compounds

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 162-168

  Lounkine, Eugen ^a   Bajorath, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CHEMISTRY;

ACTIVE COMPOUNDS; CO-OCCURRENCE; DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS; ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION; MOLECULAR FRAGMENTS;

TOPOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE;

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 65249085062     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci8002599     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barnard, J.; Downs, G. Chemical Fragment Generation and Clustering Software. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 141-142.
2. Merlot, C.; Domine, D.; Cleva, C.; Church, D. J. Chemical Substructures in Drug Discovery. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 594-602.
3. Lounkine, E.; Batista, J.; Bajorath, J. Random Molecular Fragment Methods in Computational Medicinal Chemistry. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 2108-2121.
4. Willett, P.; Barnard, J.; Downs, G. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
5. Erlanson, D. A.; McDowell, R. S.; O'Brien, T. Fragment-Based Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3463-3482.
6. Schnur, D. M.; Hermsmeier, M. A.; Tebben, A. J. Are Target-Family- Privileged Substructures Truly Privileged? J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 2000-2009.
7. Aronov, A. M.; McClain, B.; Moody, C. S.; Murcko, M. A. Kinaselikeness and Kinase-Privileged Fragments: Toward Virtual Polypharmacology. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 1214-1222.
8. Lameijer, E.; Kok, J. N.; Back, T.; Ijzerman, A. P. Mining a Chemical Database for Fragment Co-Occurrence: Discovery of "Chemical Clichés". J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 46, 553-562.
9. Lounkine, E.; Auer, J.; Bajorath, J. Formal Concept Analysis for the Identification of Molecular Fragment Combinations Specific for Active and Highly Potent Compounds. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 5342-5348.
10. Medina-Franco, J. L.; Petit, J.; Maggiora, G. M. Hierarchical Strategy for Identifying Active Chemotype Classes in Compound Databases. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2006, 67, 395-408.
11. Schuffenhauer, A.; Ertl, P.; Roggo, S.; Wetzel, S.; Koch, M.; Waldmann, H. The Scaffold Tree - Visualization of the Scaffold Universe by Hierarchical Scaffold Classification. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 47-58.
12. Batista, J.; Bajorath, J. Mining of Randomly Generated Molecular Fragment Populations uncovers Activity-Specific Fragment Hierarchies. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 1405-1413.
13. Batista, J.; Bajorath, J. Chemical Database Mining through Entropybased Molecular Similarity Assessment of Randomly Generated Structural Fragment Populations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 59-68.
14. Lewell, X. Q.; Judd, D. B.; Watson, S. P.; Hann, M. M. RECAP-Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 511-522.
15. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), version 2007.09; Chemical Computing Group, Inc.: Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2007.
16. James, C. A.; Weininger, D. Daylight Theory Manual; Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc.: Aliso Viejo, CA, 2008.
17. Auber, D. Tulip: A Huge Graph Visualisation Framework. In Graph Drawing Softwares, Mathematics and Visualization; Mutzel, P., Jünger, M., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: 2003; pp 105-126.
18. Molecular Drug Data Report (MDDR), version 2005.2; Symyx Software: San Ramon, U.S.A.