Supramolecular organization of ssdna-templated p-conjugated oligomers via hydrogen bonding

Advanced Materials

Volumn 21, Issue 10-11, 2009, Pages 1126-1130

  Surin, Mathieu ^a   Janssen, Pim G A ^b   Lazzaroni, Roberto ^a   Leclère, Philippe ^a   Meijer, E W ^b   Schenning, Albertus P H J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONS   (Belgium)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION REGIONS; ATOMISTIC MODELING; AVERAGE DIAMETERS; CD SPECTROSCOPIES; CONJUGATED OLIGOMERS; COTTON EFFECTS; HYBRID ASSEMBLIES; HYDROGEN BONDINGS; MD SIMULATIONS; P-PHENYLENE VINYLENES; STABLE STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL MODELS; SUPRAMOLECULAR ORGANIZATIONS; TAPPING-MODE ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPIES; TEMPLATED; TIME-SCALE;

ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY; CHROMOPHORES; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN BONDS; MODEL STRUCTURES; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NAPHTHALENE; OLIGOMERS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; POLYMERS; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 65149102020     PISSN: 09359648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/adma.200801701     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. B. W. Messmore J. F. Hulvat E. D. Sone S. I. Stupp, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14452.
2. S. R. Bull L. C. Palmer N. J. Fry M. A. Greenfield B. W. Messmore T. J. Meade S. I. Stupp, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2742.
3. P. Leclère M. Surin P. Brocorens M. Cavallini F. Biscarini R. Lazzaroni, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2006, 55, 1.
4. O. Ikkala G. ten Brinke, Chem. Commun. 2004, 2131.
5. F. J. M. Hoeben P. Jonkheijm E. W. Meijer A. P. H. J. Schenning, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1491.
6. J. A. A. W. Elemans R. van Hameren R. J. M. Nolte A. E. Rowan, Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1251.
7. L. Sardone V. Palermo E. Devaux D. Credgington M. De Loos G. Marletta F. Cacialli J. van Esch P. Samorì, Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1276.
8. E. Gomar-Nadal J. Puigmarti-Luis D. B. Amabilino, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 490.
9. E. Jahnke N. Severin P. Kreutzkamp J. P. Rabe H. Frauenrath, Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 409.
10. H. Frauenrath E. Jahnke, Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 2942.
11. T. Sugimoto T. Suzuki S. Shinkai S. K. Sada, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 270.
12. T. H. LaBean H. Li, Nanotoday 2007, 2, 26.
13. P. W. K. Rothemund, Nature 2006, 440, 297.
14. B. Samorì G. Zuccheri, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1166.
15. N. C. Seeman, Nature 2003, 421, 427.
16. K. Tanaka A. Tengeiji T. Kato N. Toyama M. Shionoya, Science 2003, 299, 1212.
17. F. D. Lewis L. G. Zhang X. Y. Liu X. B. Zuo D. M. Tiede H. Long G. C. Schatz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14445.
18. F. D. Lewis L. G. Zhang X. B. Zuo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10002.
19. M. A. Abdalla J. Bayer J. O. Radler K. Müllen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3967.
20. W. Wang W. Wan H. H. Zhou S. Q. Niu A. D. Q. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5248.
21. R. Iwaura K. Yoshida M. Masuda M. Ohnishi-Kameyama M. Yoshida T. Shimizu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1009.
22. R. Iwaura F. J. M. Hoeben M. Masuda A. P. H. J. Schenning E. W. Meijer T. Shimizu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13298.
23. P. G. A. Janssen J. Vandenbergh J. L. J. van Dongen E. W. Meijer A. P. H. J. Schenning, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6078.
24. G. P. Spada S. Lena S. Masiero S. Pieraccini M. Surin P. Samorì, Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 2433.
25. A. D. Mackerell J. Wiòrkiewicz-Kuczera M. Karplus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (1), 1946.
26. F. A. Momany R. Rone, J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 888.
27. A. D. MacKerell N. Banavali N. Foloppe, Biopolymers 2000, 56, 257.
28. For a stack of H-bonded dimers of OPV4 (with a quadruple H-bonding unit), the rotation angle between adjacent units is around 6128, as estimated using the Dreiding force field, see: D. Beljonne, E. Hennebicq, C. Daniel, L. M. Herz, C. Silva, G. D. Scholes, F. J. M. Hoeben, P. Jonkheijm, A. P. H. J. Schenning, S. C. J. Meskers, R. T. Phillips, R. H. Friend, E. W. Meijer, J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 10594. The difference with the value of 408 found here comes from the fact we do not take into account H-bonding dimers, but only stacks of OPV units with the central chiral groups.
29. + counter-ions show results in accordance with S. Sen, L. Nilsson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7414
30. J. M. Martinez S. K. C. Elmroth L. Kloo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12279.
31. The dT40-OPV disassembly is also more difficult than the dT40-NT disassembly: the hysteresis of the dT40-OPV disassembly is larger, which also supports an increased stability.
32. Note that the average number of H-bonds in the studied complexes varies with the temperature used in the MD simulation. Here we only show the results for MD performed at 298 K.
33. F. C. Spano S. C. J. Meskers E. Hennebicq D. Beljonne, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7044.
34. C. Bustamante J. Vesenka C. L. Tang W. Rees M. Guthold R. Keller, Biochemistry 1992, 31, 22.