Correlation of scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopic analyses for visualization of dentin/adhesive interfaces in the root canal

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-14

  Bitter, Kerstin ^a   Paris, Sebastian ^b   Mueller, Jan ^a   Neumann, Konrad ^a   Kielbassa, Andrej M ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Correlation; Hybrid layer; Root canal dentin; Scanning electron microscopy

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL BONDING AGENT; CLEARFIL CORE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORESCEIN; FLUORESCENT DYE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; RHODAMINE; RHODAMINE ISOTHIOCYANATE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PULP; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FLUORESCEIN; FLUORESCENT DYES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; RHODAMINES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 65149090060     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a14703     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bancroft JD, Stevens A. Theory and practice of histological techniques. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996.
2. Bitter K, Paris S, Martus P, Schartner R, Kielbassa AM. A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope investigation of different dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 840-848.
3. Cury AH, Goracci C, Navarro MF, Carvalho RM, Sadek FT, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of hygroscopic expansion on the push-out resistance of glass ionomer-based cements used for the luting of fiber posts. J Endod 2006; 32: 537-540.
4. D’Alpino PH, Pereira JC, Svizero NR, Rueggeberg FA, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. A new technique for assessing hybrid layer interfacial micromorphology and integrity: Two-photon laser microscopy. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 279-284.
5. D’Alpino PH, Pereira JC, Svizero NR, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Use of fluorescent compounds in assessing bonded resin-based restorations: a literature review. J Dent 2006; 34: 623-634.
6. Doerfer CE, Staehle HJ, Wurst MW, Duschner H, Pioch T. The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of different dentin bonding agents, thermocycling and etching time. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 08: 364-365.
7. D’Souza PD, Duschner H, Staehle HJ, Pioch T. Dentin bonding systems: a comparative study of SEM and CLSM used to visualize the resin-dentin interface. Acta Med Dent Helv 1999; 4: 20-26.
8. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 627-635.
9. Griffiths BM, Watson TF. Resin-dentin interface of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 212-216.
10. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 125-130.
11. Pearce EI, Nelson DG. Microstructural features of carious human enamel imaged with back-scattered electrons. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 113-118.
12. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Jr., Denehy GE, Wefel JS, Donly KJ. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 44-55.
13. Pioch T, Sorg T, Stadler R, Hagge M, Dörfer CE. Resin penetration through submicrometer hiatus structures: a SEM and CLSM study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 238-243.
14. Pioch T, Stotz S, Buff E, Duschner H, Staehle HJ. Influence of different etching times on hybrid layer formation and tensile bond strength. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 202-206.
15. Pioch T, Stotz S, Staehle HJ, Duschner H. Applications of confocal laser scanning microscopy to dental bonding. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11: 453-461.
16. Pirani C, Chersoni S, Foschi F, Piana G, Loushine RJ, Tay FR, Prati C. Does hybridization of intraradicular dentin really improve fiber post retention in endodontically treated teeth?. J Endod 2005; 12: 891-894.
17. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Cury AH, Tay F, Ferrari M. Immediate and 24-hour evaluation of the interfacial strengths of fiber posts. J Endod 2006; 32: 1174-1177.
18. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005; 31: 584-589.
19. Tjaderhane L, Hietala EL, Larmas M. Mineral element analysis of carious and sound rat dentin by electron probe microanalyzer combined with backscattered electron image. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1770-1774.
20. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 3D-18D.
21. Watson TF. Applications of confocal scanning optical microscopy to dentistry. Br Dent J 1991; 171: 287-291.
22. Watson TF. A confocal optical microscope study of the morphology of the tooth/restoration interface using Scotchbond 2 dentin adhesive. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1124-1131.
23. Watson TF. Fact and artefact in confocal microscopy. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11: 433-440.