Selective versus Standard Ligature of the Deep Venous Complex during Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effects on Continence, Blood Loss, and Margin Status

European Urology

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1377-1385

  Porpiglia, Francesco ^a   Fiori, Cristian ^a   Grande, Susanna ^a   Morra, Ivano ^a   Scarpa, Roberto M ^a  

^a SAN LUIGI GONZAGA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Deep venous complex; Laparoscopic prostatectomy; Selective ligature; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CATHETER REMOVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOLOGY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; SURGICAL APPROACH; URETER CATHETERIZATION; URINE INCONTINENCE; VEIN LIGATION;

AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LAPAROSCOPY; LIGATION; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; VEINS;

EID: 65049086190     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Guillonneau B., el-Fettouh H., Baumert H., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169 (2003) 1261-1266
2. Touijer K., and Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 625-632
3. Rassweiler J., Hruza M., Teber D., and Su L.-M. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy - critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 612-624
4. Bollens R., Vanden Bossche M., Roumeguere T., et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 40 (2001) 65-69
5. Stolzenburg J.U., Rabenalt R., Do M., et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases. World J Urol 25 (2007) 45-51
6. Guillonneau B., Rozet F., and Cathelineau X. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167 (2002) 51
7. Hoznek A., Antiphon P., Borkowski T., et al. Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 61 (2003) 617-622
8. Trabulsi E.J., and Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173 (2005) 1072-1079
9. Stolzenburg J.-U., Liatsikos E.N., Rabenalt R., et al. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy - effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 103-112
10. Cambio A.J., and Evans C.P. Minimizing postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 903-913
11. Rocco B., Gregori A., Stener S., et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 51 (2007) 996-1003
12. Katz R., Salomon L., and Hoznek A. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. J Urol 169 (2003) 2049-2053
13. Walsh P.C. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh P.C., Retik A.B., Stamey T.A., and Vaughan Jr. E.D. (Eds). Campbell's Urology (2004), Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 2865-2886
14. Walsh P.C. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160 (1998) 2418-2424
15. Graefen M., Walz J., and Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 38-48
16. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163 (2000) 1643-1649
17. Porpiglia F., Terrone C., Tarabuzzi R., et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single center. Urology 68 (2006) 376-380
18. Tubaro A., Zattoni F., Prezioso D., et al. Italian validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires. BJU Int 97 (2006) 101-108
19. Rocco F., Carmignani L., Acquati P., et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdoshpincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175 (2006) 2201-2206
20. Montorsi F., Salonia A., Suardi N., et al. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 938-945
21. Stolzenburg J.-U., Schwalenberg T., Horn L.-C., Neuhaus J., Constantinides C., and Liatsikos E.N. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 51 (2007) 629-639
22. Steiner M.S., Morton R.A., and Walsh P.C. Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary incontinence. J Urol 145 (1991) 512-515
23. Rassweiler J., Schulze M., Teber D., Seemann O., and Frede T. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opinion in Urol 14 (2004) 75-82
24. Mattei A., Naspro R., Annino F., Burke D., Guida Jr. R., and Gaston R. Tension and energy-free robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles. Eur Urol 52 (2007) 687-695
25. Nguyen M.M., Turna B., Santos B.R., et al. The use of an endoscopic stapler vs suture ligature for dorsal vein control in laparoscopic prostatectomy: operative outcomes. BJU Int 101 (2008) 463-466