On the contribution of modelling to multifunctional agriculture: Learning from comparisons

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 90, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2009, Pages

  Groot, Jeroen C J ^a   Rossing, Walter A H ^a   Tichit, Muriel ^b   Turpin, Nadine ^c   Jellema, André ^a   Baudry, Jacques ^c   Verburg, Peter H ^a   Doyen, Luc ^d   van de Ven, Gerrie W J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Exploration; Modelling; Multifunctionality; Policy; Scales; Solution space

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; FARMS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; REGIONAL PLANNING;

FARMING ACTIVITIES; MODELING; MODELING APPROACH; MODELLING TOOLS; MULTIFUNCTIONAL AGRICULTURES; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; SCALE; SOLUTION SPACE; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; THREE MODELS;

LAND USE;

AGRICULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; HETEROGENEITY; LEARNING; MODELING; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT;

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FARMING SYSTEM; FRANCE; LANDSCAPING; NETHERLANDS; RURAL AREA; STATISTICAL MODEL; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 65049085394     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.030     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Annets J.E., and Audsley E. Multiple objective linear programming for environmental planning. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53 (2002) 933-943
2. Arheimer B., Torstensson G., and Wittgren H.B. Landscape planning to reduce coastal eutrophication: agricultural practices and constructed wetlands. Landsc. Urban Plann. 67 (2004) 205-215
3. Aubin J.P. Viability Theory (1991), Birkhäuser, Boston
4. Barkaoui A., and Butault J.-P. Impacts sur l'offre des régions françaises de la réforme de la PAC de 2003. INRA Sciences Sociales 4-5 (2004) 6
5. Beintema A.J., and Müskens G.J.D.M. Nesting success of birds breeding in Dutch agricultural grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 24 (1987) 743-758
6. Béné C., Doyen L., and Gabay D. A viability analysis for a bio-economic model. Ecol. Econ. 36 (2001) 385-396
7. Berger P.A., and Bolte J.P. Evaluating the impact of policy options on agricultural landscapes: an alternative-futures approach. Ecol. Applic. 14 (2004) 342-354
8. Bergey P.K., and Ragsdale C. Modified differential evolution: a greedy random strategy for genetic recombination. Omega-Int. J. Manage. Sci. 33 (2005) 255-265
9. Beissinger S.R., and Westphal M.I. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. J. Wildl. Manag. 62 (1998) 821-841
10. Bohnet I., and Smith D.M. Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: a social-ecological framework. Landsc. Urban Plann. 80 (2007) 137-152
11. Bouma J., Stoorvogel J.J., Quiroz R., Staal S., Herrero M., Immerzeel W., Roetter R.P., Van den Bosch H., Sterk G., Rabbinge R., and Chater S. Ecoregional research for development. Adv. Agron. 93 (2007) 257-311
12. Clark J. The institutional limits to multifunctional agriculture: subnational governance and regional systems of innovation. Environ. Plann. C 24 (2006) 331-349
13. Crossman N.D., and Bryan B.A. Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming. Biol. Conserv. 128 (2006) 369-383
14. Cury P.M., Mullon C., Garcia S.M., and Shannon L.J. Viability theory for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62 (2005) 577-584
15. DATAR. Quelle France rurale pour 2020? Contribution à une nouvelle politique du développement durable (2003), DATAR, Paris 59 pp.
16. De Lara M., Doyen L., Gilbaud T., and Rochet M.J. Is a management framework based on spawning-stock biomass indicators sustainable? A viability approach. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64 (2007) 761-767
17. DeVoil P., Rossing W.A.H., and Hammer G.L. Exploring profit - sustainability trade-offs in cropping systems using evolutionary algorithms. Environ. Model. Softw. 21 (2006) 1368-1374
18. De Wit C.T., Van Keulen H., Seligman N.G., and Spharim I. Application of interactive multiple goal programming techniques for analysis and planning of regional agricultural development. Agric. Syst. 26 (1988) 211-230
19. Doyen L., and Béné C. Sustainability of fisheries through marine reserves: a robust modelling analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 69 1 (2003) 1-13
20. Durand G., and Van Huylenbroeck G. Multifunctionality and rural development: a general framework. In: Van Huylenbroeck G., and Durand G. (Eds). Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development (2003), Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire, England 1-16
21. Eisenack K., Scheffran J., and Kropp J.P. Viability analysis of management frameworks for fisheries. Environ. Model. Assess. 11 (2006) 69-79
22. Ferrière R., Sarrazin F., Legendre S., and Baron J.-P. Matrix population models applied to viability analysis and conservation: theory and practice using the ULM software. Acta. Oecol. 17 (1996) 629-656
23. Geertsema, W., 2002. Plant survival in dynamic habitat networks in agricultural landscapes. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
24. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning (1989), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 412 pp.
25. Green R.E., Cornell S.J., Scharlemann J.P.W., and Balmford A. Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 207 (2005) 550-555
26. Groot J.C.J., Rossing W.A.H., Jellema A., Stobbelaar D.J., Renting H., and Van Ittersum M.K. Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality - a methodology to support discussions on land-use perspectives. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 120 (2007) 58-69
27. Gude P.H., Hansen A.J., Rasker R., and Maxwell B. Rates and drivers of rural residential development in the Greater Yellowstone. Landsc. Urban Plann. 77 (2006) 131-151
28. Hajkowicz S., Perraud J.M., Dawes W., and DeRose R. The strategic landscape investment model: a tool for mapping optimal environmental expenditure. Environ. Model. Softw. 20 (2005) 1251-1262
29. Hisschemöller M., Tol R.S.J., and Vellinga P. The relevance of participatory approaches in integrated assessment. Integr. Assess. 2 (2001) 57-72
30. Holman I.P., Rounsevell M.D.A., Shackley S., Harrison P.A., Nicholls R.J., Berry P.M., and Audsley E. A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK. Clim. Change 71 (2005) 9-41
31. Irwin E.G., and Geoghegan J. Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 85 (2001) 7-23
32. Kleijn D., Berendse F., Smit R., and Gilissen N. Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413 (2001) 723-725
33. Knickel K.H., and Renting H. Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development. Sociol. Ruralis 40 (2000) 512-528
34. Lankoski J., and Ollikainen M. Agri-environmental externalities: a framework for designing targeted policies. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 30 (2003) 51-75
35. Losch B. Debating the multifunctionality of agriculture: from trade negotiations to development policies by the South. J. Agrar. Change 4 (2004) 336-360
36. Makowski D., Hendrix E.M.T., Van Ittersum M.K., and Rossing W.A.H. A framework to study nearly optimal solutions of linear programming models developed for agricultural land use exploration. Ecol. Model. 131 (2000) 65-77
37. Marshall E.P., and Homans F.R. Juggling land retirement objectives on an agricultural landscape: coordination, conflict, or compromise?. Environ. Manag. 38 (2006) 37-47
38. Martinet V., and Doyen L. Sustainability of an economy with an exhaustible resource: a viable control approach. Resour. Energy Econ. 29 (2007) 17-39
39. Matthews K.B., Buchan K., Sibbald A.R., and Craw S. Combining deliberative and computer-based methods for multi-objective land-use planning. Agric. Syst. 87 (2005) 18-37
40. McIntosh B.S., Jeffrey P., Lemon M., and Winder N. On the design of computer-based models for integrated environmental science. Environ. Manag. 35 (2005) 741-752
41. Mimouni M., Zekri S., and Flichman G. Modelling the trade-offs between farm income and the reduction of erosion and nitrate pollution. Ann. Oper. Res. 94 (2000) 91-103
42. Moffett A., Garson J., and Sarkar S. MultCSync: a software package for incorporating multiple criteria in conservation planning. Environ. Model. Softw. 20 (2005) 1315-1322
43. Münier B., Birr-Pedersen K., and Schou J.S. Combined ecological and economic modelling in agricultural land use scenarios. Ecol. Model 174 (2004) 5-18
44. Newburn D.A., Berck P., and Merenlender A.M. Habitat and open space at risk of land-use conversion: targeting strategies for land conservation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 88 (2006) 28-42
45. OECD. Multifunctionality - Towards an Analytical Framework (2001), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris 27 pp.
46. Oomes M.J.M. Yield and species density of grassland during restoration management. J. Veg. Sci. 3 (1992) 271-274
47. Overmars, K.P., Verburg, P.H., Veldkamp, T., 2007. Comparison of a deductive and an inductive approach to specify land suitability in a spatially explicit land use model. Land Use Pol., in Press.
48. Renting H., Rossing W.A.H., Groot J.C.J., Van der Ploeg J.D., Laurent C., Perraud D., Stobbelaar D.J., and Van Ittersum M.K. Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J. Environ. Manage. 90 S2 (2009) S112-S123
49. Roetter R.P., Hoanh C.T., Laborthe A.G., Van Keulen H., Van Ittersum M.K., Dreiser C., Van Diepen C.A., De Ridder N., and Van Laar H.H. Integration of Systems Network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia. Environ. Model. Softw. 20 (2005) 291-307
50. Rossing W.A.H., Zander P., Josien E., Groot J.C.J., Meyer B., and Knierim A. Integrative modeling approaches for analysis of impact of multifunctional agriculture: a review for France, Germany and The Netherlands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 120 (2007) 41-57
51. Rothley K.D. Designing bioreserve networks to satisfy multiple, conflicting demands. Ecol. Applic. 9 (1999) 741-750
52. Rothley K.D. Finding the tradeoffs between the reserve design and representation. Environ. Manag. 38 (2006) 327-337
53. Sarkar S., and Garson J. Multiple criterion synchronisation for conservation area network design: the use of non-dominated alternative sets. Conserv. Soc. 2 (2004) 433-448
54. Sattler C., Schuler J., and Zander P. Determination of trade-off-functions to analyse the provision of agricultural non-commodities. Int. J. Agric. Res. Govern. Ecol. 5 (2006) 309-325
55. Strange N., Thorsen B.J., and Bladt J. Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world. Biol. Conserv. 131 (2006) 33-41
56. Storn, R., Price, K., 1995. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, USA, 12 pp. Technical Report TR-95-012.
57. Swagemakers P., and Wiskerke J.C.S. Integrating nature conservation and landscape management in farming systems in the Friesian Woodlands. In: Tress B., Tres G., Fry G., and Opdam P. (Eds). From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning Aspects of Integration, Education and Application. Wageningen UR Frontis Series vol. 12 (2004), Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 321-334
58. Tichit M., Doyen L., Lemel J.Y., Renault O., and Durant D. A co-viability model of grazing and bird community management in farmland. Ecol. Model. 206 (2007) 277-293
59. Tichit M., Durant D., and Kernéïs E. The role of grazing in creating suitable sward structures for breeding waders in agricultural landscapes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 96 (2005) 119-128
60. Tichit M., Hubert B., Doyen L., and Genin D. A viability model to assess the sustainability of mixed herds under climatic uncertainty. Anim. Res. 53 (2004) 405-417
61. Tichit M., Renault O., and Potter T. Grazing regime as a tool to assess positive side effects of livestock farming systems on wading birds. Livest. Prod. Sci. 96 (2005) 109-117
62. Tscharntke T., Klein A.M., Kruess A., Steffan-Dewenter I., and Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005) 857-874
63. Turnhout E., Hisschemoller M., and Eijsackers H. Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy. Ecol. Indic. 7 (2007) 215-228
64. Turpin, N., Dupraz, P., Thenail, C., Joannon, A., Baudry, J. et al., 2006. Landscape organisation and multifunctionality in the Beauce plain at local and regional scales: a scenario analysis with the CLUE-S model. First Workshop on Landscape Economics, Angers, Institut National d'Horticulture, 9-10 juin 2006, p. 21.
65. Van Der Ploeg J.D., Bouma J., Rip A., Rijkenberg F.H.J., Ventura F., and Wiskerke J.S.C. On regimes, novelties, niches and co-production. In: Wiskerke J.S.C., and van der Ploeg J.D. (Eds). Seeds of Transition. Essays on Novelty Production, Niches and Regimes in Agriculture (2004), Van Gorcum, Assen 1-27
66. Van de Ven G.W.J., and Van Keulen H. A mathematical approach to comparing environmental and economic goals in dairy farming: identifying strategic development options. Agric. Syst. 94 (2007) 231-246
67. Van Ittersum M.K., and Rabbinge R. Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations. Field Crops Res. 52 (1997) 197-208
68. Van Langevelde F., Claassen F., and Schotman A. Two strategies for conservation planning in human-dominated landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plann. 58 (2002) 281-295
69. Verburg P.H., Soepboer W., Veldkamp A., Limpiada R., Espaldon V., and Mastura S.S.A. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environ. Manag. 30 (2002) 391-405
70. Verburg P.H., Eickhout B., and van Meijl H. A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. Ann. Reg. Sci. (2008) 10.1007/s00168-007-0136-4
71. Wossink A., Van Wenum J., Jurgens C., and De Snoo G. Co-ordinating economic, behavioural and spatial aspects of wildlife preservation in agriculture. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 26 (1999) 443-460
72. Young O.R., Lambin E.F., Alcock F., Haberl H., Karlsson S.I., McConnell W.J., Myint T., Pahl-Wostl C., Polsky C., Ramakrishnan P.S., Schroeder H., Scouvart M., and Verburg P.H. A portfolio approach to analyzing complex human-environment interactions: institutions and land change. Ecol. Soc. 11 2 (2006) 31
73. Zander P., Groot J.C.J., Josien E., Karpinski I., Knierim A., Meyer B.C., Madureira L., Rambonilaza M., and Rossing W.A.H. Farm models and economic valuation in the context of multifunctionality: a review of approaches from France, Germany, The Netherlands and Portugal. Int. J. Agric. Res. Govern. Ecol. 7 4/5 (2008) 339-360
74. Zander P., and Kächele H. Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development. Agric. Syst. 59 (1999) 311-325