Single-scattering optical tomography

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Florescu, Lucia ^a   Schotland, John C ^a   Markel, Vadim A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL IMAGING; CLASSICAL PROBLEMS; EXTINCTION CO-EFFICIENT; ILL-POSEDNESS; INHOMOGENEOUS MEDIUMS; MEAN-FREE PATHS; MESOSCOPIC; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGING; RADIATIVE TRANSPORT EQUATIONS; RADON TRANSFORMS; RAY TRANSFORMS; SCATTERING EVENTS; SINGLE SCATTERINGS; SYSTEM SIZES; TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGING;

DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; INVERSE PROBLEMS; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; RADON; SCATTERING;

FOURIER TRANSFORMS;

EID: 64949161001     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.036607     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. T. Wilson and C. J. R. Sheppard, Theory and Practice of Scanning Optical Microscopy (Academic, New York, 1984).
2. J. A. Izatt, M. R. Hee, G. M. Owen, E. A. Swanson, and J. G. Fujimoto, Opt. Lett. 19, 590 (1994). 10.1364/OL.19.000590
3. J. Sharpe, U. Ahlgren, P. Perry, B. Hill, A. Ross, J. Hecksher-Sorensen, R. Baldock, and D. Davidson, Science 296, 541 (2002). 10.1126/science.1068206
4. T. S. Ralston, D. L. Marks, P. S. Carney, and S. A. Boppart, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 23, 1027 (2006). 10.1364/JOSAA.23.001027
5. T. S. Ralston, D. L. Marks, P. S. Carney, and S. A. Boppart, Nat. Phys. 3, 129 (2007). 10.1038/nphys514
6. S. Arridge, Inverse Probl. 15, R41 (1999). 10.1088/0266-5611/15/2/022
7. M. C. W. van Rossum and Th. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 313 (1999). 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.313
8. A. Ishimaru, Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media (IEEE Press, New York, 1997).
9. J. J. Duderstadt and W. R. Martin, Transport Theory (Wiley, New York, 1979).
10. J. C. Schotland and V. A. Markel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 18, 2767 (2001). 10.1364/JOSAA.18.002767
11. V. A. Markel and J. C. Schotland, Phys. Rev. E 70, 056616 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056616
12. R. C. Erdmann and C. E. Siewert, J. Math. Phys. 9, 81 (1968). 10.1063/1.1664481
13. E. W. Larsen, J. Math. Phys. 15, 299 (1974). 10.1063/1.1666642
14. The measure of how numerically well conditioned the problem associated with solving the linear equation Ax=b is the condition number of the matrix A. This can be regarded as the rate at which the solution x changes with respect to a change in b and can be calculated as the ratio between the maximal and minimal singular values of A, respectively. A problem with a low condition number is said to be well conditioned, while a problem with a high condition number is said to be ill conditioned.
15. F. Natterer and F. Wubbeling, Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2001).
16. A. J. Welch and M. J. C. van Gemert, Optica-Thermal Response of Laser-Irradiated Tissue (Plenum, New York, 1995).
17. C. Vinegoni, C. Pitsouli, D. Razansky, N. Perrimon, and V. Ntziachristos, Nat. Methods 5, 45 (2008). 10.1038/nmeth1149
18. M. J. Lighthill, Fourier Analysis and Generalized Functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1960).