Defining the Arts and Cultural Universe: Lessons from the Profiles Project

Journal of Arts Management Law and Society

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 185-205

  Filicko, Therese ^a   Lafferty, Sue Anne ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64949159858     PISSN: 10632921     EISSN: 19307799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10632920209596974     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Assembly. 1997. The arts and the public purpose. The Ninety-Second American Assembly. 29 May-1 June 1997. New York: American Assembly, Columbia University Press.
2. Arthurs, A., F. Hodsoll, and S. Levine. 1998a. The collaborating arts: For profit and not-for-profit connections: Existing and potential, final report. Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Center.
3. Arthurs, A., F. Hodsoll, and S. Levine. 1998b. For profit and not-for-profit arts connections: Existing and potential. New York: The American Assembly. Columbia University.
4. Cherbo, J. and M. Peters. 1998. The missing sector: The unincorporated arts. Journul of Arts. Management, Law, and Society 28 (2): 115-28.
5. Cummings, M„ Jr., and R. Katz. 1987. The patron state: Government and the arts in Europe and North America and Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. DiMaggio, P. and D. Kaple. 1996. Information on arts organizations: Why there isn’t enough, a plan for getting more, and a report on how methodological dilemmas turned into philosophical questions before the researchers' eyes. Grantmakers in the Arts 7 (2).
7. Galligan, A. 1999. Providence's approach to the unincorporated part of the arts sector. The Arts Policy and Administration Occasional Paper Series, Paper 11. Available at http://www.arts.ohio-state.edu/ArtEducation/APA/pdf_files/paper11.pdf.
8. Galligan, A., and N. Alper. 1998. Characteristics of performing artists: A baseline profile of sectoral crossovers. Journal of Arts, Management, Law, and Society 29 (2): 155-77.
9. National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, U.S. Public Law 89-209. 29 September 1965 89th Congress. 2nd Session. Available at www.nea.gov/leam/Legislation.pdf.
10. Ohio Arts Council Web page http://www.oac.ohio.gov/about/.
11. Pankratz, D. 1998. The non-profit and commercial arts: Understanding future options. CultureWorks http://dark-wing.uoregon.edu/-aacl/cullurework.html.
12. Wolpert, J. 1993. Philanthropy, service and common purpose. New York: American Assembly, Columbia University Press
13. Wolpert, J. 1995. Who’s supporting the safety net. Presented on 26 April at the Mandel Center for Nonprofit Organizations. Case Western Reserve University. Cleveland, Ohio.
14. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 1980. Studies and documents on cultural policies. Paris: UNESCO.
15. California Arts Council webpage http://www.cac.ca.gov/boilerplate.htm.
16. Cherbo, J., and M. J. Wyszomirski. 2000. The public life of the arts in America. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
17. DiMaggio, P., ed. 1986. Nonprofit enterprise in the arts: Studies in mission and constraint. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Kaple, D., Z. Rivkin-Fish, H. Louch, L. Morris, and P. DiMaggio. 1988. Comparing sample frames for research on arts organizations: Results of a study in three metropolitan areas. Journal of Arts, Management, Law, and Society 28 (1): 41-66.
19. Larson, G. 1996. Lifelong journey: An education in the arts. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
20. National Endowment for the Arts. 1996. Annual Report. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
21. Pankratz, D., and V. Morris. 1990. The future of the arts: Public policy and arts research. New York: Praeger Publishers.
22. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 1969. Studies and documents on cultural policies. Paris: UNESCO.