Estimation of proteinuria as a predictor of complications of pre-eclampsia: A systematic review

BMC Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Thangaratinam, Shakila ^a   Coomarasamy, Arri ^a   O'Mahony, Fidelma ^b   Sharp, Steve ^c   Zamora, Javier ^d   Khan, Khalid S ^a   Ismail, Khaled M K ^b  

^a BIRMINGHAM WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KEELE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; HELLP SYNDROME; HUMAN; NEWBORN DEATH; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PERINATAL DEATH; PREDICTION; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROTEINURIA; REVIEW; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; SOLUTIO PLACENTAE; STILLBIRTH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; FEMALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PROTEINURIA;

EID: 64949129865     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-10     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Chan P Brown M Simpson J Davis G Proteinuria in pre-eclampsia: How much matters? BJOG 2005, 112:280-285. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00395.x 15713140
2. Pollak VE Nettles JB The kidney in toxemia of pregnancy: A clinical and pathologic study based on renal biopsies Medicine (Baltimore) 1960, 39:469-526. 13736843
3. Spargo B McCartney CP Winemiller R Glomerular capillary endotheliosis in toxemia of pregnancy Arch Pathol 1959, 68:593-599. 13833162
4. Page EW Christianson R The impact of mean arterial pressure in the middle trimester on the impact of pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976, 125:740-746. 937399
5. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia Practice bulletin No.: 33 Washington (DC), American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002
6. Cunningham FG Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy Williams' Obstetrics New York: McGraw-Hill 2001: 567-618.
7. Ferazzani S Caruso A De Carolis S Martino IV Mancoso S Proteinuria and outcome of 444 pregnancies complicated by hypertension Am Journal Obstet Gynecol 1990, 162:366-371.
8. Irwig LM Tosteton AN Gatsonis CA Lao J Colditz G Chalmers TC Mosteller Fl Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests Ann Intern Med 1994, 120:667-676. 8135452
9. Cochrane Methods Working Group Systematic Reviews of Screening and Diagnostic Tests: Recommended Methods 1996
10. Deeks JJ Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests BMJ 2001, 323:157-162. 1120791 11463691 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157
11. Khan KS Dinnes J Kleijnen J Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001, 95:6-11. 10.1016/ S0301-2115(00)00463-2
12. Thangaratinam S Coomarasamy A Sharp S O'Mahony F O'Brien S Ismail KMK Khan KS Tests for predicting complications of pre-eclampsia: A protocol for systematic reviews BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008, 8:38. 2553049 18694494 10.1186/1471-2393-8-38
13. Lijmer JG Mol BW Heisterkamp S Bonsel GJ Prins MH Meulen van der JHP Bossuyt PM Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests JAMA 1999, 282:1061-1066. 10.1001/jama.282.11.1061 10493205
14. Rennie D Improving reports of diagnostic tests: The STARD initiave JAMA 2003, 289:89-90. 10.1001/jama.289.1.89 12503983
15. Jaeschke R Guyatt GH Sackett DL Users' guide to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1994, 271:703-707. 10.1001/jama.271.9.703 8309035
16. DerSimonian R Laird N Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 1986, 7:177-188. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 3802833
17. Sutton AJ Abrams KR Jones DR Sheldon TJ Song F Systematic reviews of trials and other studies Health Technol Assess 1998, 2:1-276. 10347832
18. Greenland S Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature Epidemiol Rev 1987, 9:1-30. 3678409
19. Brown MA Buddle ML Hypertension in pregnancy: Maternal and fetal outcomes according to laboratory and clinical features Med J Aust 1996, 165:360-365. 8890841
20. Buchbinder A Sibai BM Caritis S MacPherson C Hauth J Lindheimer MD Klebanoff M Vandorsten P Landon M Paul R Miodovnik M Meis P Thurnau G National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 186:66-71. 10.1067/ mob.2002.120080 11810087
21. Fliegner J-RH Placental function and renal tract studies in pre eclampsia with proteinuria and long term maternal consequences Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976, 126:211-217. 986768
22. Furukawa S Sameshima H Ikenoue T Intrapartum late deceleration develops more frequently in pre-eclamptic women with severe proteinuria J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2006, 32:68-73. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00353.x 16445528
23. Hall DR Odendaal HJ Steyn DW Grove D Urinary protein excretion and expectant management of early onset, severe pre-eclampsia Int J Gyn Obstet 2002, 77:1-6. 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00008-5
24. Lao TT Chin R-KH Lam YM The significance of proteinuria in pre-eclampsia; proteinuria associated with low birth weight only in pre-eclampsia Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1988, 29:121-127. 10.1016/ 0028-2243(88)90138-4 3192032
25. Martin JN Jr May WL Magann EF Terrone DA Rinehart BK Blake P-G Early risk assessment of severe preeclampsia: Admission battery of symptoms and laboratory tests to predict likelihood of subsequent significant maternal morbidity Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 180:1407-1414. 10.1016/ S0002-9378(99)70026-8 10368478
26. Newman MG Robichaux AG Stedman CM Jaekle RK Todd FM Dotson T Lewis TF Perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia that is complicated by massive proteinuria Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 188:264-268. 10.1067/mob.2003.84 12548227
27. Odegaard RA Vatten LJ Nilsen ST Salvesen KA Austgulen R Preeclampsia and fetal growth Obstet Gynecol 2000, 96:950-955. 10.1016/ S0029-7844(00)01040-1 11084184
28. Paladini A Frollo G Nappi G (Clinical-statistical study on the hypertension-edema-nephrosis syndrome. II. Sequelae for the fetus, particular attention to perinatal mortality) Arch Ostet Ginecol 1970, 75:297-306. 5514835
29. Schiff E Friedman SA Kao L Sibai BM The importance of urinary protein excretion during conservative management of severe preeclampsia Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 175:1313-1316. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70047-9 8942507
30. Taylor HC Jr Tillman AJ Blanchard J Fetal losses in hypertension and preeclampsia. I. An analysis of 4432 cases Obstet Gynecol 1954, 3:225-239. 13133247
31. Thurnau GR Dyer A Depp-III OR Martin AO The development of a profile scoring system for early identification and severity assessment of pregnancy-induced hypertension Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983, 146:406-416. 6859162
32. von Dadelszen P Magee LA Devarakonda RM Hamilton T Ainsworth LM Yin R Norena M Walley KR Gruslin A Moutquin JM Lee SK Russell JA The prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in preeclampsia J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004, 26:871-880. 15507197
33. Waugh J Bell SC Kilby MD Lambert P Shennan A Halligan A Urine protein estimation in hypertensive pregnancy: Which thresholds and laboratory assay best predict clinical outcome? Hypertens Pregnancy 2005, 24:291-302. 10.1080/10641950500281019 16263601
34. Weenink GH Treffers PE Vijn P Plasma antithrombin III levels in pre-eclampsia. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension - Part B Hypertens Pregnancy 1983, 2:145-162. 10.3109/10641958309023467
35. Taylor HC Jr Tillman AJ Blanchard J Fetal losses in hypertension and in pre-eclampsia. II. Prognosis for the fetus according to the week of gestation Obstet Gynecol 1954, 3:371-384. 13154779