Originality in postmodern appropriation art

Journal of Arts Management Law and Society

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 247-258

  van Camp, Julie C ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Appropriation art; Authorship; Copyright; Originality; Postmodern art

Indexed keywords

EID: 64949121314     PISSN: 10632921     EISSN: 19307799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JAML.36.4.247-258     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrams, C. M. 1992. Art appropriation and the work of Sherrie Levine. San Jose Studies 18 (2): 49–63.
2. Bailey, George. 1993. Originality. In A companion to aesthetics, ed. David E. Cooper. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
3. Baudrillard, J. 1983. The ecstasy of communication. Trans. J. Johnston. In The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture, ed. H. Foster, 126–34. Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press.
4. Beardsley, C. M. 1981. Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
5. Benjamin, W. 1982. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Modern art and modernism: A critical anthology, ed. F. Franscina and C. Harrison, 217–20. New York: Harper and Row.
6. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony. 1884. 111 U.S. 53.
7. Carlin, J. 1988. Culture vultures: Artistic appropriation and intellectual property law. Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts XIII:103–43.
8. Collingwood, R. G. 1938. The principles of art. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Copyright Act of 1976. Public Law 94-553, 94th Cong. October 19.
10. Elkins, J. 1993. From original to copy and back again. British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (2): 113–20.
11. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., Inc. 1991. 499 U.S. 340.
12. Goldblatt, D. 1984. Self-plagiarism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism XLIII:71–77.
13. Hausman, C. R. 1985. Originality as a criterion of creativity. In Creativity in art, religion, and culture, ed. H. Mitias, 26–41. Amsterdam: Rodopi B. V.
14. Hoaglund, J. 1976. Originality and aesthetic value. British Journal of Aesthetics 16 (1): 46–55.
15. Kennick, W. E. 1985. Art and authenticity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism XLIV: 3–12.
16. Khatchadourian, H. 1961. Art-names and aesthetic judgments. Philosophy 36:30–48.
17. Knizek, I. 1993. Walter Benjamin and the mechanical reproducibility of art works revisited. British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (4): 357–66.
18. Krauss, R. 1981. The originality of the avant-garde: A postmodernist repetition. October 18:47–66.
19. Leon v. Pacific Telegraph. 1937. 91 F.2d 484. 9th Cir.
20. Lewallen, C. 1993. Sherrie Levine. Journal of Contemporary Art 6:59–83.
21. Lovejoy, M. 1990. Art technology, and postmodernism: Paradigms, parallels, and paradoxes. Art Journal 49 (3): 257–65.
22. Mann, P. 1995. Stupid undergrounds. Postmodern Culture 5:3.
23. Marzorati, G. 1986. Art in the (re)making. Art News 85:91.
24. Osborne, H. 1979. The concept of creativity. British Journal of Aesthetics 19:224–31.
25. Rose, M., and M. Woodmansee. 2002. Note: Originality. Harvard Law Review 115:1988–2009.
26. Sibley, F. N. 1985. Originality and value. British Journal of Aesthetics 25:169–84.
27. Wang, E. H. 1990. (Re)Productive rights: Copyright and the postmodern artist. Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts 24:261–81.
28. Wollheim, R. 1968. Art and its objects. New York: Harper and Row.