The state arts agency: An overview of cultural federalism in the United States

Journal of Arts Management Law and Society

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 67-80

  Mulcahy, Kevin V ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64949119432     PISSN: 10632921     EISSN: 19307799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10632920209597335     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adams, William Howard. 1966. The politics of arts: Forming a state arts council. New York: Arts Councils of America.
2. DiMaggio, Paul J. 1991. Decentralization of arts funding from the federal government to the states. Public money and the muse. Ed. Stephen Bennedict. New York: Norton. 216-56.
3. Dworkin, Dennis. 1991. State advocacy in the arts: A historical overview. Journal of Arts Management and Law 21 (fall): 199-213.
4. FY 2000 Legislative Appropriations Survey. 2000.Washington, DC: NASAA.
5. Galligan, Ann. 1993. The politicization of peer-review panels at the NEA. In Paying the piper: Causes and consequences of art patronage. Ed. Judith Huggins Balfe. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 254-70.
6. Love, Jeffrey. 1991. Sorting out our roles: The state arts agencies and the National Endowment for the Arts. Journal of Arts Management and Law 21 (fall): 215-26.
7. Mulcahy, Kevin V. 1992. The structure and politics of local support for the arts in the United States. In Decentralization, régionalisation et action culturelle municipale. Ed. Mario Beaulac and Francois Colbert. Montreal: Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales. 59-78.
8. Mulcahy, Kevin V. 1999a. The abused patron of culture: Public culture and patronage in the United States. Boehmacahier 44 (200): 169-81.
9. Mulcahy, Kevin V. 1999b. Cultural patronage in the Unites States. International Journal of Cultural Management 2 (fall): 53-55.
10. Mulcahy, Kevin V. 2000. The government and cultural patronage: A comparative analysis of cultural patronage in the United States, France, Norway, and Canada. The public life of the arts in America. Ed. Joni Maya Cherbo and Margaret Jane Wyszomirski. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 138-68.
11. National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). 1965. The first annual report for the National Endowment for the Arts, 1964-1965. Washington, DC: Author. 72.
12. National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). 1967. Annual report of the National Endowment for the Arts and National Council for the Arts. Washington, DC: Author.
13. National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). 1992. Local program review for the National Council for the Arts. August.
14. National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). 1993. State and regional program review: A report to the National Council for the Arts. February.
15. Netzer, Dick. 1978. The subsidized muse: Public support for the arts in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Reagan, Michael D. 1972. The new federalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Research Briefs: Human Resources Trends. 2000. Washington, DC: NASAA.
18. Svenson, Arthur. 1982. States and local arts agencies. In Public policy and the arts. Ed. Kevin Mulcahy and C. Richard Swaim. Boulder, CO: Westview. 195-205.
19. Urice, John. 1992. The future of the state arts agency movement in the 1990s. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 22 (Spring): 21-22.
20. U.S. House of Representatives. Special Subcommittee on Labor, Committee on Education and Labor. 1967. Amendments to the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965: Hearings on H.R. 11308. 90th Cong., 1st sess. 18, 26 July.
21. Wyszomirski, Margaret Jane, and Kevin V. Mulcahy. 1995. The organization of public support for the arts. In America's commitment to culture: Government and the arts. Ed. Kevin V. Mulcahy and Margaret Jane Wyszomirski. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 121-43.