Spatially explicit estimation of soil denitrification rates and land use effects in the riparian buffer zone of the large Guanting reservoir

Geoderma

Volumn 150, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 240-252

  Wang, Xuelei ^a,b   Yang, Shengtian ^a   Mannaerts, C M ^b   Gao, Yunfei ^a   Guo, Jianxia ^c  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c NATIONAL CLIMATE CENTER   (China)

Author keywords

Denitrification; Land use; Remote sensing; Reservoir catchment; Riparian zone

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; ANAEROBIC INCUBATIONS; BEIJING , CHINAS; DENITRIFICATION PROCESS; DENITRIFICATION RATES; GREEN HOUSE GAS; GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATIONS; GUANTING RESERVOIRS; HOT-SPOTS; LABORATORY-SCALE; LAND SURFACES; LANDSATS; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; MODEL PARAMETERS; MODELING RESULTS; NITROUS OXIDES; NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTIONS; REMOTE SENSING DATUM; RESERVOIR CATCHMENT; RIPARIAN AREAS; RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONES; RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS; RIPARIAN ZONE; SATELLITE DATUM; SOIL TYPES; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; WATER RESERVOIRS; WETLAND ENVIRONMENTS;

CATCHMENTS; ECOSYSTEMS; GAS EMISSIONS; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; GREENHOUSES; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LAND USE; LEAKAGE (FLUID); NITROGEN OXIDES; NITROGEN REMOVAL; PLANNING; POLLUTION CONTROL; REMOTE SENSING; RUNOFF; SOILS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER SUPPLY; WETLANDS;

DENITRIFICATION;

BUFFER ZONE; DENITRIFICATION; EMISSION; ESTIMATION METHOD; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; MODEL VALIDATION; NITROUS OXIDE; RESERVOIR; RIPARIAN ZONE; SOIL CHEMISTRY; WATER SUPPLY;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; GUANTING RESERVOIR;

EID: 64849114564     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.01.026     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. 4 emissions from soils under conventional and no-till management practices in Goiânia (Cerrados, Brazil). Geoderma 141 (2007) 78-88
2. Basnyat P., Teeter L.D., Lockaby B.G., and Flynn K.M. The use of remote sensing and GIS in watershed level analyses of non-point source pollution problems. Forest Ecology and Management 128 (2000) 65-73
3. Beijing Agricultural Bureau. Beijing soil (1984) (Internal reference)
4. Canty M.J. Image Analysis, Classification and Change Detection in Remote Sensing (With Algorithms for ENVIIDL) (2007), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
5. Chander G., and Markham B.L. Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures, and postcalibration dynamic ranges. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing vol. 41 (2003) 2674-2677. http://landsat.usgs.gov/tools_L5_TM_Cal_2003.pdf http://landsat.usgs.gov/tools_L5_TM_Cal_2003.pdf (2008-9-6)
6. Cheng H.S., Mohd K.Y., Brian S., Sinn C.H., and Mashhor M. Nutrient removal in a pilot and full scale constructed wetland, Putrajaya city, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management 88 (2008) 307-317
7. de Jong R., and Cameron D.R. Computer simulation model for predicting soil water content profiles. Soil Science 128 1 (1979) 41-48
8. Desjardins R.L., Smith W., Grant B., Campbell C., and Riznek R. Management strategies to sequester carbon in agricultural soils and to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic Change 70 (2005) 283-297
9. 4 fluxes in potato fields: automated measurement, management effects and temporal variation. Geoderma 105 (2002) 307-325
10. Francisco A.C., Jose A.R., Valeria A., and Carmen G. Nitrogen removal and cycling in restored wetlands used as filters of nutrients for agricultural runoff. Water Science and Technology 35 5 (1997) 255-261
11. Gersberg R.M., Elkins B.V., Lyon S.R., and Goldman C.R. Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wetlands. Water Research 20 3 (1986) 363-368
12. Grundmann G.L., and Rolston D.E. A water function approximation to degree of anaerobiosis associated with denitrification. Soil Science 144 (1987) 437-441
13. Hall F.G., Strebel D.E., Nickeson J.E., and Goetz S.J. Radiometric rectification: toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sensing of Environment 35 (1991) 11-27
14. Heinen M. Application of a widely used denitrification model to Dutch data sets. Geoderma 133 (2006) 464-473
15. Heinen M. Simplified denitrification models: overview and properties. Geoderma, 133 (2006) 444-463
16. Inamdar S.P., Lowrance R.R., Altier L.S., Williams R.G., and Hubbard R.L. Riparian Ecosystem Management Model (REMM): II. Testing of the water quality and nutrient cycling component for a Coastal Plain riparian system. Transactions of the ASAE 42 6 (1999) 1691-1707
17. IPCC. Climate change 1995: scientific and technical analyses of impacts, adaptations and mitigation. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1996), Cambridge Univ. Press, London
18. Johannsen C.J., and Barney T.W. Remote sensing applications for resource management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 36 (1981) 128-131
19. Jones C.A. CERES-Maize; a simulation model of maize growth and development (1986), TEXAS A and M University press 79-90
20. Jordan T.E., Correll D.L., and Weller D.E. Nutrient interception by riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland. Journal of Environmental Quality 22 (1992) 467-473
21. Kerstin R., Leif K., Sune A., and Thomas R. Estimates of denitrification in soil by remote sensing of thermal infrared emission at different moisture levels. Biol Fertile Soils 16 (1993) 193-197
22. Kizito F., Sène M., Dragila M.I., Lufafa A., Diedhiou I., Dossa E., Cuenca R., Selker J., and Dick R.P. Soil water balance of annual crop-native shrub systems in Senegal's peanut basin: the missing link. Agricultural Water Management 90 (2007) 137-148
23. Kros, H., 2002. Evaluation of biogeochemical models at local and regional scale. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University press, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 284.
24. Kuusemets V., and Mander U. Ecotechnological measures to control nutrient losses from catchments. Water Science and Technology, 40 10 (1999) 195-202
25. Leal A.K.M. Remote sensing of riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47 (2002) 799-816
26. Lee K.H., Isenhart T.M., and Schulta R.C. Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58 1 (2003) 1-8
27. Lei Z.D.({A.f.i.p.}), Yang S.X.({A.f.i.p.}), and Xie S.C.({A.f.i.p.}). Soil water dynamics({A figure is presented} (1988), Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
28. 2O and NO emissions from forest soils: 1. Model development. Journal of Geophysical Research 105 (2000) 4369-4384
29. Liang S.L. Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo I. Algorithms. Remote Sensing of Environment 76 (2000) 213-238
30. Lin Y.F., Lin C.Y., and Chou W.C. Modeling of riparian vegetated buffer strip width and placement a case study in Shei Pa National Park, Taiwan. Ecological Engineering 23 (2004) 327-339
31. 2O emissions in arable soils: effect of tillage, N source and soil moisture. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39 (2007) 2362-2370
32. Liu Y.H., Yu Z.R., Jian C., Zhang F.R., Doluschitz R., and Axmacher J.C. Changes of soil organic carbon in an intensively cultivated agricultural region: a denitrification-decomposition (DNDC) modeling approach. Science of the Total Environment 372 (2006) 203-214
33. Lowrance R., Altier I.S., and Williams R.G. Herbicide transport in a managed riparian forest buffer system. Transactions of the ASAE 40 4 (1997) 1047-1057
34. Naiman R.J., and Decamps H. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28 (1997) 621-658
35. Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., and Kiniry J.R. Soil and water assessment tool and water assessment tool (SWAT) theoretical documentation- chapter 01.1 and chapter 05.2 (2005). http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/doc.html (http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/doc.html. 2008-9-5)
36. Nina S. Effect and design of buffer zones in the Nordic climate: the influence of width, amount of surface runoff, seasonal variation and vegetation type on retention efficiency for nutrient and particle runoff. Ecological Engineering, 24 (2005) 483-490
37. Peterjohn W.T., and Correll D.L. Nutrient dynamics in an Agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65 (1984) 1466-1475
38. SEBAL(Surface Energy Balance Algorithms for Land). Advanced training and users manual. Funded by a NASA EOSDIS/Synergy grant from the Raytheon Company through The Idaho Department of Water Resources. version 1.0 (2002) 62-64
39. Sharply A.N., and Williams J.R. EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1) model documentation (1990) USDA-ARS Technical Bulletin 1768. USDA-ARS, Washington, DC.
40. Su Z. The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 6 1 (2002) 85-99
41. 4 Emission Flux and Dynamics in Xishan Area (1999), Beijing Forestry University Press, Beijing [D]
42. Syversen N. Effect and design of buffer zones in the Nordic climate. Ecological Engineering 24 5 (2005) 483-490
43. Tang S.H., Zhu Q.J., Wang J.D., Zhou Y.Y., and Zhao F. Principle and application of three-band gradient difference vegetation index. Science in China (Series D-earth science) 48 2 (2005) 241-249
44. van Dam J.C., Huygen J., Wesseling J.G., Feddes R.A., Kabat P., van Walsum P.E.V., Groenendijk P., and van Diepen C.A. Theory of SWAP version 2.0. Simulation of Water Flow, Solute Transport and Plant Growth in the Soil-Water-Atmosphere-Plant Environment. Technical Document 45 (1997), Winand Staring Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands
45. Xie H.J., Hicks N., Randy Keller G., Huang H.T., and Kreinovich V. An IDL/ENVI implementation of the FFT-based algorithm for automatic image registration. Computers & Geosciences 29 (2003) 1045-1055
46. Yeomans J.C., Bremner J.M., and McCarty C.W. Denitrification capacity and denitrification potential of subsurface soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 23 (1992) 919-927