Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 402-407

  KjÆrgaard, Hanne ^a,c   Olsen, Jørn ^b   Ottesen, Bent ^a   Dykes, Anna Karin ^c  

^a Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

augmentation; Dystocia; incidence; nulliparas; prolonged labor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNION FLUID; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; DYSTOCIA; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LABOR ONSET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; NULLIPARA; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DENMARK; INCIDENCE; LABOR; LABOR COMPLICATION; LABOR STAGE 2; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEWBORN; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; PARITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; TIME;

ADULT; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; APGAR SCORE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; DENMARK; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR PRESENTATION; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 64849112380     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340902811001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin number 49, December 2003: dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1445-54.
2. Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:589-95.
3. Foley ME, Alarab M, Daly L, Keane D, Rath A, O'Herlihy C. The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:891-5.
4. Friedman EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6:567-89.
5. Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187: 824-8.
6. Albers LL. The duration of labor in healthy women. J Perinatol. 1999;19:114-9.
7. Vahratian A, Troendle JF, Siega-Riz AM, Zhang J. Methodological challenges in studying labour progression in contemporary practice. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20:72-8.
8. Greenberg MB, Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Stotland NE, Bryant AS, Caughey AB. Are there ethnic differences in the length of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:743-8.
9. Cluett ER, Pickering RM, Getliffe K, St. George Saunders NJ. Randomised controlled trial of labouring in water compared with standard of augmentation for management of dystocia in first stage of labour. BMJ. 2004;328:314.
10. Treacy A, Robson M, O'Herlihy C. Dystocia increases with advancing maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195: 760-3.
11. Oscarsson ME, Ahmer-Wahlin I, Rydhstroem H, Kallen K. Outcome in obstetric care related to oxytocin use. A population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:1094-8.
12. Herbst A, Wolner-Hanssen P, Ingemarsson I. Risk factors for acidemia at birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:125-30.
13. Cahill DJ, Boylan PC, O'Herlihy C. Does oxytocin augmentation increase perinatal risk in primigravid labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:847-50.
14. Peisner DB, Rosen MG. Transition from latent to active labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:448-51.
15. Selin L, Wallin G, Berg M. Dystocia in labour-risk factors, management and outcome: a retrospective observational study in a Swedish setting. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:216-21.
16. O'Driscoll K, Maegher D, Boylan PC. Active management of labour. London: Mosby; 1993.
17. World Health Organisation. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. In: Services WHOTR, ed. Geneva: 2000.
18. Myles TD, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:52-8.
19. Saunders NS, Paterson CM, Wadsworth J. Neonatal and maternal morbidity in relation to the length of the second stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:381-5.
20. Menticoglou SM, Manning F, Harman C, Morrison I. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:906-12.
21. Altman MR, Lydon-Rochelle MT Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Birth. 2006;33:315-22.
22. Sheiner E, Levy A, Feinstein U, Hallak M, Mazor M. Risk factors and outcome of failure to progress during the first stage of labor: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:222-6.
23. Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, Sorensen TI, Aaby P, Andersen AM, et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort - its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29: 300-7.