Intrathecal morphine for caesarean section: An assessment of pain relief, satisfaction and side-effects
Swart M, Sewell J, Thomas D. Intrathecal morphine for caesarean section: an assessment of pain relief, satisfaction and side-effects. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 373-7.
Soikkeli A, KorttilaK. A double-blinded, randomized comparison of intrathecal and epidural morphine for elective cesarean delivery
Sarvela J, Halonen R Soikkeli A, KorttilaK. A double-blinded, randomized comparison of intrathecal and epidural morphine for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 436-40.
Comparison of 0.25 mg and 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine for analgesia after cesarean section
Yang T, Breen TW, Archer D, Fick G. Comparison of 0.25 mg and 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine for analgesia after cesarean section. Can J Anesth 1999 I 46: 856-60.
Mini-dose intrathecal morphine for the relief of post-cesarean section pain •' safety, efficacy, and ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide
Abboud TK, Dror A, Mosaad R Zhu J, Mantilla M, Swart E et al. Mini-dose intrathecal morphine for the relief of post-cesarean section pain •' safety, efficacy, and ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 137-43.
Intrathecal administration of morphine for elective caesarean section. A comparison between 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg
Milner AR, Bogod DG, Harwood RJ. Intrathecal administration of morphine for elective caesarean section. A comparison between 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg. Anaesthesia 1996 I 51: 871-3.
Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia
Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 437-44.
Small doses of intrathecal morphine combined with systemic diclofenac for postoperative pain control after cesarean delivery
Cardoso MM, Carvalho JC, Amaro AR, Prado AA, Cappelli EL. Small doses of intrathecal morphine combined with systemic diclofenac for postoperative pain control after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 538-41.