Transient electromagnetic response of a loop source over a rough geological medium

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 177, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 421-429

  Everett, Mark E ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic theory; Fractals and multifractals; Hydrogeophysics

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; FIELD SURVEY; GEOELECTRIC FIELD; GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE; GEOPHYSICS; HYDROGEOLOGY; LAPLACE TRANSFORM; PARAMETERIZATION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 64849096127     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.04011.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Das, U.C., 1995. Frequency- and time-domain electromagnetic responses of layered earth: A multiseparation, multisystem approach, Geophysics, 60, 285-290.
2. Davies, B. & Martin, B., 1979. Numerical inversion of the Laplace transform: Survey and comparison of methods, J. Comput. Phys., 33, 1-32.
3. Edwards, R.N. & Cheesman, S.J., 1987. Two-dimensional modelling of a towed transient magnetic dipole-dipole sea floor EM system, J. Geophys., 61, 110-121.
4. Everett, M.E., 1990. Active electromagnetics at the midocean ridge, PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 139 pp.
5. Everett, M.E. & Edwards, R.N., 1993. Transient marine electromagnetics: The 2.5-D forward problem, Geophys. J. Int., 113, 545-561.
6. Everett, M.E. & Weiss, C.J., 2002. Geological noise in near-surface electromagnetic data, Geophys. Res. Lett, 29, 2001GL014049.
7. Fitterman, D.V. & Anderson, W.L., 1987, Effect of transmitter turn-off time on transient soundings, Geoexploration, 24, 131-146.
8. Gaver, D.P., 1966. Observing stochastic processes, and approximate transform inversion, Oper. Res., 14, 444-459.
9. Hüpper, B. & Pollak, E., 1999. Numerical inversion of the Laplace transform, J. Chem. Phys., 110, 11176-11186.
10. Knight, J.H. & Raiche, A.P., 1982. Transient electromagnetic calculations using the Gaver-Stehfest inverse Laplace transform method, Geophysics, 47, 47-50.
11. Metzler, R. & Klafter, J., 2000. The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: A fractional dynamics approach, Phys. Rep., 339, 1-77.
12. Molz, F.J. & Hyden, P.D., 2006. A new type of stochastic fractal for application in subsurface hydrology, Geoderma, 134, 274-283.
13. Morrison, H.F., Phillips, R.J. & O'Brien, D.P., 1969. Quantitative interpretation of transient electromagnetic fields over a layered half space, Geophys. Prospect., 21, 82-101.
14. Nabighian, M.N., 1979. Quasi-static transient response of a conducting half-space: An approximate representation, Geophysics, 44, 1700-1705.
15. Oldham, K.B. & Spanier, J., 1974. The Fractional Calculus, Academic Press, New York.
16. Painter, S.L., 1996. Evidence for non-Gaussian scaling behavior in heterogeneous sedimentary formations, Water Resour. Res., 32, 1183-1195.
17. Pilkington, M. & Todoeschuck, J.P., 1993. Fractal magnetization of continental crust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 627-630.
18. Ryu, J., Morrison, H.F. & Ward, S.H., 1970. Electromagnetic fields about a loop source of current, Geophysics, 35, 862-896.
19. Smith, R.S., Walker, P.W., Polzer, B.D. & West, G.F., 1988. The time-domain electromagnetic response of polarizable bodies: An approximate convolution algorithm, Geophys. Prospect., 36, 772-785.
20. Stehfest, H., 1970. Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms, Comm. A.C.M., 13, 47-49 (see also remark p.624).
21. Tennekoon, L., Boufadel, M.C. & Nyquist, J.E., 2005. Multifractal characterization of airborne geophysical data at the Oak Ridge facility, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 19, 227-239.
22. Wait, J.R., 1951. The magnetic dipole over the horizontally stratified earth, Can. J. Phys., 29, 577-592.
23. Ward, S.H. & Hohmann, G.W., 1987. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications, in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 1, pp. 131-311, ed. Nabighian, M.N., SEG Press, Tulsa, OK.
24. Weiss, C.J. & Everett, M.E., 2007. Anomalous diffusion of electromagnetic eddy currents in geological formations, J. geophys. Res, 112, B08102, doi 10.1029/2006JB004475.