|
|
Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2008, Pages
|
|
Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: A cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis based on a randomized, controlled trial
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;
BACKACHE;
CHRONIC PAIN;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
COST UTILITY ANALYSIS;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME;
FOLLOW UP;
GANGLIONECTOMY;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LETTER;
MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE;
NERVE BLOCK;
NEUROMODULATION;
NOCICEPTION;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RADICULAR PAIN;
REOPERATION;
RHIZOTOMY;
SCREENING;
SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION;
SPINAL CORD STIMULATION;
SPINE FUSION;
TRANSCUTANEOUS NERVE STIMULATION;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ECONOMICS;
METHODOLOGY;
NEUROSURGERY;
NOTE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SPINAL CORD;
BACK PAIN;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS;
HUMANS;
NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
REOPERATION;
SPINAL CORD;
TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRIC NERVE STIMULATION;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
|
|
EID: 64849095789
PISSN: 0148396X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000333965.70646.61 Document Type: Letter |
|
Times cited : (7)
|
|
References (2)
|
