Noninvasive coronary angiography focusing on calcification: Multislice computed tomography compared with magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 179-185

  Langer, Christoph ^a   Peterschröder, Andreas ^a   Franzke, Krista ^a   Esdorn, Hermann ^a   Körperich, Hermann ^a   Meyer, Hans ^a   Horstkotte, Dieter ^a   Wiemer, Marcus ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Calcification; Computed xray tomography; Coronary angiography; Coronary disease; Coronary vessels; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; BIOMINERALIZATION; BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HEART; MAGNETISM; RESONANCE;

CALCIFICATION; COMPUTED X-RAY TOMOGRAPHIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CALCIFICATIONS; CORONARY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSEL; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; STENOSIS DETECTION;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTIFACT; CALCINOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; GENERAL APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

ARTIFACTS; CALCINOSIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 64749116919     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181839624     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. van Buuren F, Horstkotte D. 21st Report about the statistics of the heart catheterization laboratory in the German Federal Republic. Results of the joint inquiry of the Commission for Clinical Cardiology and of the Working Groups for Interventional Cardiology and Angiology of the German Society for Cardiology and Circulatory Research in the year 2004. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006;95:383-387.
2. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J. 2006;151:404-411.
3. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896-1910.
4. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient- versus segment-based analysis. Circulation. 2004;110:2638-2643.
5. Meyer TS, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:946-950.
6. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(19):2354- 2360. Epub 2007 Jul 21.
7. Manning WJ, Li W, Edelman RR. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:828-832.
8. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1863-1869.
9. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475-1497.
10. Langer C, Wiemer M, Peterschröder A, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: complementary use in noninvasive coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005;112:e343-e344.
11. Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP, et al. Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology. 1998;208:807-814.
12. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5-40.
13. Sorensen TS, Korperich H, Greil GF, et al. Operator-independent isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for morphology in congenital heart disease: a validation study. Circulation. 2004;110:163-169.
14. Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergman GW. Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiology. 1999;213:751-758.
15. Shea SM, Deshpande VS, Chung YC, et al. Three-dimensional true-FISP imaging of the coronary arteries: improved contrast with T2-preparation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:597-602.
16. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CTwith 16 × 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1978-1986.
17. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G, et al. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:92-100.
18. Gerber BL, Coche E, Pasquet A, et al. Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection - initial results. Radiology. 2005;234: 98-108.
19. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:407-415.
20. Romeo F, Leo R, Clementi F, et al. Multislice computed tomography in an asymptomatic high-risk population. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99: 325-328.
21. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology. 2005;234:86-97.
22. Regenfus M, Ropers D, Achenbach S, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:44-50.
23. Ikonen AE, Manninen HI, Vainio P, et al. Three-dimensional respiratory-gated coronary MR angiography with reference to x-ray coronary angiography. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:583-589.
24. Kessler W, Laub G, Achenbach S, et al. Coronary arteries: MR angiography with fast contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold imaging - initial experience. Radiology. 1999;210:566-572.
25. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation. 2006;113:1305-1310.
26. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart. 2008;94(9):1132-1137.
27. Langer C, Franzke K, Butz T, et al. Coronary artery kinking with poststenotic ectasia: multislice computed tomography completes diagnosis: a review of the literature. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32:276-278.