Do microbial interactions and cultivation media decrease the accuracy of salmonella surveillance systems and outbreak investigations?

Journal of Food Protection

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 707-713

  Singer, Randall S ^a,b   Mayer, Anne E ^a   Hanson, Timothy E ^c   Isaacson, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOVINAE; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SUBSP. ENTERICA SEROVAR NEWPORT; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM;

EID: 64749110883     PISSN: 0362028X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.4.707     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Altekruse, S. F., F. Elvinger, Y. Wang, and K. Ye. 2003. A model to estimate the optimal sample size for microbiological surveys. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6174-6178.
2. Althouse, C, S. Patterson, P. Fedorka-Cray, and R. E. Isaacson. 2003. Type 1 fimbriae of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium bind to enterocytes and contribute to colonization of swine in vivo. Infect. lmmun. 71:6446-6452.
3. Baumler, A. J., R. M. Tsolis, T. A. Ficht, and L. G. Adams. 1998. Evolution of host adaptation in Salmonella enterica. Infect, lmmun. 66:4579-4587.
4. Davies, A. P., O. J. Billington, B. A. Bannister, W. R. Weir, T. D. McHugh, and S. H. Gillespie. 2000. Comparison of fitness of two isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, one of which had developed multi-drug resistance during the course of treatment. J. Infect. 41: 184-187.
5. Davies, P. R., P. K. Turkson, J. A. Funk, M. A. Nichols, S. R. Ladely, and P. J. Fedorka-Cray. 2000. Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 89:169-177.
6. Funk, J. A., P. R. Davies, and M. A. Nichols. 2000. The effect of fecal sample weight on detection of Salmonella enterica in swine feces. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 12:412-418.
7. Harvey, R. W., and T. H. Price. 1967. The examination of samples infected with multiple Salmonella serotypes. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 65:423-434.
8. Harvey, R. W., and T. H. Price. 1976. Isolation of salmonellas from sewage-polluted river water using selenite F and Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 77:333-339.
9. Hosmer, D. W., Jr., and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
10. Muniesa, M., A. R. Blanch, F. Lucena, and J. Jofre. 2005. Bacterio-phages may bias outcome of bacterial enrichment cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:4269-4275.
11. Popoff, M. Y. 2001. Antigenic formulas of the Salmonella serovars. WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Institut Pasteur, Paris.
12. Rostagno, M. H., J. K. Gailey, H. S. Hurd, J. D. Mckean, and R. C. Leite. 2005. Culture methods differ on the isolation of Salmonella enterica serotypes from naturally contaminated swine fecal samples. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 17:80-83.
13. Singer, R. S., C. L. Cooke, C. W. Maddox, R. E. Isaacson, and R. L. Wallace. 2006. Use of pooled samples for the detection of Salmonella in feces by polymerase chain reaction. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 18:319-325.
14. Singer, R. S., W. O. Johnson, J. S. Jeffrey, R. P. Chin, T. E. Carpenter, E. R. Atwill, and D. C. Hirsch. 2000. A statistical model for assessing sample size for bacterial colony selection: a case study of Escherichia coli and avian cellulitis. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 12:118-125.
15. Voogt, N., N. J. Nagelkerke, A. W. van de Giessen, and A. M. Hen-ken. 2002. Differences between reference laboratories of the European community in their ability to detect Salmonella species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:449-454.
16. Winkle, S., and R. Rohde. 1958. The diagnostic and epidemiological significance of mixed infections due to several Salmonella serotypes. Zentbl. Bakteriol. 173:153-158.