Differences in ankle range of motion before and after exercise in 2 tape conditions

American Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 383-389

  Purcell, Steven B ^a   Schuckman, Brynn E ^a   Docherty, Carrie L ^a,b   Schrader, John ^a   Poppy, Wendy ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Smith Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Ankle electrogoniometer; Physically active; Self adherent tape

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANKLE; ANKLE DORSIFLEXION; ANKLE EVERSION; ANKLE INJURY; ANKLE INVERSION; ANKLE PLANTARFLEXION; ARTICLE; ATHLETIC TAPE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; ELECTROGONIOMETER; ELECTRONICS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GONIOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT STABILITY; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TENSILE STRENGTH; VOLUNTEER; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; ANKLE; ANKLE INJURIES; ANKLE JOINT; ATHLETIC TAPE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64749110509     PISSN: 03635465     EISSN: 15523365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363546508325925     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alt W, Lohrer H, Gollhofer A. Functional properties of adhesive ankle taping: neuromuscular and mechanical effects before and after exercise. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:238-245.
2. Borg G. The Borg CR10 Scale. In: Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1998:39-43.
3. Bragg RW, Macmahon JM, Overom EK, et al. Failure and fatigue characteristics of adhesive athletic trape. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2002;34:403-410.
4. Docherty CL, Arnold BL, Zinder SM, Gansender BM. Relationship between two proprioceptive measures and stiffness at the ankle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002;14:317-324.
5. Docherty CL, Moore JH, Arnold BL. Effects of strength training on strength development and joint position sense in functionally unstable ankles. J Athl Train. 1998;33:310-314.
6. Firer P. Effectiveness of taping for the prevention of ankle ligament sprains. Br J Sports Med. 1990;24:47-50.
7. Fumich RM, Ellison AE, Guerin GJ, Grace PD. The measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med. 1981;9:165-169.
8. Gabbard C, Hart S. A question of foot dominance. J Gen Psychol. 1996;123:289-298.
9. Garrick JG. Epidemiologic perspective. Clin Sports Med. 1982;1: 13-18.
10. Garrick JG. Epidemiology of foot and ankle injuries. Med Sport Sci. 1987;23:991-997.
11. Garrick JG. The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1977;5:241-242.
12. Garrick JG, Requa RK. The epidemiology of foot and ankle injuries in sports. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1989;6:629-637.
13. Garrick JG, Requa RK. Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1973;5:200-203.
14. Greene TA, Hillman SK. Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during, and after exercise. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:498-506.
15. Gross MT, Bradshaw M, Ventry L, Weller K. Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1987;9:33-39.
16. Gross MT, Lapp A, Davis J. Comparison of Swede-O-Universal® ankle support and Aircast® circled Sport-Stirrup™ orthoses and ankle tape in restricting eversion-inversion before and after exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;13:11-19.
17. James SL, Bates BT, Osternig LR. Injuries in runners. Am J Sports Med. 1978;6:40-50.
18. Larsen E. Taping the ankle for chronic instability. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55:551-553.
19. Man IO, Glover K, Nixon P, Poyton R, Terre R, Morrissey M. Effect of body position on foot and ankle volume in healthy subjects. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004;24:323-326.
20. Manfroy P P, Ashton-Miller JA, Wojtys EM. The effect of exercise, prewrap, and athletic tape on the maximal active passive ankle resistance to ankle inversion. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:156-163.
21. Metcalfe RC, Schlabach GA, Looney MA, Renehan EJ. A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance. J Athl Train 1997;32:136-140.
22. Morris H, Musnicki W. The effect of taping on ankle mobility following moderate exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1983;23:422-426.
23. Myburgh KH, Vaughan CL, Isaacs SK. The effect of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match. Am J Sports Med. 1984;12:441-446.
24. Paris D, Kokkaliaris J, Vardaxis V. Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced. J Athl Train. 1995;30:223-228.
25. Pederson T, Ricard M, Merrill G, Schulthies S, Allssen P. The effects of spatting and ankle taping on inversion before and after exercise. J Athl Train. 1997;32:29-33.
26. Rarick G, Bigley G, Karst R, Malina RM. The measurable support of the ankle joint by conventional methods of taping. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962;44:1183-1190.
27. Ricard M, Sherwood SM, Schulthies SS, Knight KL. Effects of tape and exercise on dynamic ankle inversion. J Athl Train. 2000;35: 31-37.
28. Rovere GD, Clarke TJ, Yates CS, Burley K. Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1988;16:228-232.
29. Seitz C, Goldfuss AJ. The effect of taping and exercise on passive foot inversion and ankle plantarflexion. J Athl Train. 1984;19:178-182.
30. Wilkerson GB. Comparative biomechanical effects of the standard method of ankle taping and a taping method designed to enhance subtalar stability. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:588-595.