Validation of a questionnaire assessing patient's aesthetic and functional outcome after nasal reconstruction: the patient NAFEQ-score

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 656-662

  Moolenburgh, S E ^a   Mureau, M A M ^a   Duivenvoorden, H J ^a   Hofer, S O P ^a,b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aesthetic outcome; Functional outcome; Nasal reconstruction; Questionnaire; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE; NOSE DEFORMITIES, ACQUIRED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHINOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 64749109276     PISSN: 17486815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Quatela V.C., Sherris D.A., and Rounds M.F. Esthetic refinements in forehead flap nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121 (1995) 1106-1113
2. Drisco B.P., and Baker S.R. Reconstruction of nasal alar defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3 (2001) 91-99
3. Rohrich R.J., Griffin J.R., Ansari M., et al. Nasal reconstruction-beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 114 (2004) 1405-1416
4. Arden R.L., Nawroz-Danish M., Yoo G.H., et al. Nasal alar reconstruction: a critical analysis using melolabial island and paramedian forehead flaps. Laryngoscope 109 (1999) 376-382
5. Burget G.C., and Menick F.J. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 76 (1985) 239-247
6. Menick F.J. Artistry in aesthetic surgery. Aesthetic perception and the subunit principle. Clin Plast.Surg 14 (1987) 723-735
7. Burget G.C., and Menick F.J. Aesthetic reconstruction of the nose (1994), C.V. Mosby, St. Louis
8. Howard B.K., and Rohrich R.J. Understanding the nasal airway: principles and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 109 (2002) 1128-1146
9. Mureau M.A.M., Moolenburgh S.E., Levendag P.C., et al. Aesthetic and functional outcome following nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg (October 2007)
10. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
11. Secord P.F., and Jourard S.M. The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol 17 (1953) 343-347
12. Alsarraf R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24 (2000) 192-197
13. Wright J.G. Outcomes research: what to measure. World J Surg 23 (1999) 1224-1226
14. Stewart M.G., and Porter J.P. Outcomes research and facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 18 (2002) 73-76
15. Stewart M.G. Outcomes research: an overview. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 66 (2004) 163-166
16. Strasser E.J. An objective grading system for the evaluation of cosmetic surgical results. Plast Reconstr Surg 104 (1999) 2282-2285
17. Alsarraf R. Outcomes instruments in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 18 (2002) 77-86
18. Stewart M.G., Smith T.L., Weaver E.M., et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130 (2004) 283-290