Macular thickness, retinal thickness, and optic disk parameters in dominant compared with nondominant eyes

Journal of AAPOS

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 142-147

  Samarawickrama, Chameen ^a   Wang, Jie Jin ^a,b   Huynh, Son C ^a   Wang, Xiu Ying ^c,d   Burlutsky, George ^a   Stapleton, Fiona ^c   Mitchell, Paul ^a  

^a WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^d INNER MONGOLIA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; EYE; EYE DOMINANCE; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OPTIC DISK; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE; THICKNESS; TISSUE STRUCTURE; VISUAL ACUITY;

ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CHILD; CORNEA; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MYOPIA; OPTIC DISK; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 64749098361     PISSN: 10918531     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Porac C., and Coren S. The dominant eye. Psychol Bull 83 (1976) 880-897
2. Mapp A.P., Ono H., and Barbeito R. What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review. Percept Psychophys 65 (2003) 310-317
3. Waheed K., and Laidlaw D.A. Disease laterality, eye dominance, and visual handicap in patients with unilateral full thickness macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol 87 (2003) 626-628
4. Seijas O., Gomez d.L., Gomez d.L., Roberts C.J., Piedrahita E., and Diaz E. Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision. Am J Ophthalmol 144 (2007) 209-216
5. Jain S., Arora I., and Azar D.T. Success of monovision in presbyopes: Review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 40 (1996) 491-499
6. Wright K.W., Guemes A., Kapadia M.S., and Wilson S.E. Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 177-182
7. Back A., Grant T., and Hine N. Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections. Optom Vis Sci 69 (1992) 474-480
8. Coren S., and Duckman R.H. Ocular dominance and amblyopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 52 (1975) 47-50
9. Asakawa K., Ishikawa H., Kawamorita T., Fujiyama Y., Shoji N., and Uozato H. Effects of ocular dominance and visual input on body sway. Jpn J Ophthalmol 51 (2007) 375-378
10. Mansour A.M., Sbeity Z.M., and Kassak K.M. Hand dominance, eye laterality and refraction. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81 (2003) 82-83
11. Cheng C.Y., Yen M.Y., Lin H.Y., Hsia W.W., and Hsu W.M. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 2856-2860
12. Chia A., Jaurigue A., Gazzard G., Wang Y., Tan D., Stone R.A., and Saw S.M. Ocular dominance, laterality, and refraction in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 (2007) 3533-3536
13. Atchison D.A., Schmid K.L., Edwards K.P., Muller S.M., and Robotham J. The effect of under and over refractive correction on visual performance and spectacle lens acceptance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 21 (2001) 255-261
14. Fink W.H. The dominant eye: Its clinical significance. Arch Ophthalmol 18 (1938) 555-582
15. Coren S. Development of ocular dominance. Devl Psychol 10 (1974) 304
16. Ojaimi E., Rose K.A., Morgan I.G., Smith W., Martin F.J., Kifley A., et al. Distribution of ocular biometric parameters and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 2748-2754
17. Ojaimi E., Rose K.A., Smith W., Morgan I.G., Martin F.J., and Mitchell P. Methods for a population-based study of myopia and other eye conditions in school children: The Sydney Myopia Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 12 (2005) 59-69
18. Klein R., Klein B.E., Linton K.L., and De Mets D.L. The Beaver Dam Eye Study: Visual acuity. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 1310-1315
19. Rice M.L., Leske D.A., Smestad C.E., and Holmes J.M. Results of ocular dominance testing depend on assessment method. J AAPOS 12 (2008) 365-369
20. Ehrenstein W.H., Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen B.E., and Jaschinski W. Eye preference within the context of binocular functions. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243 (2005) 926-932
21. Phillips J.R. Monovision slows juvenile myopia progression unilaterally. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 1196-1200
22. Repka M.X., Goldenberg-Cohen N., and Edwards A.R. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 142 (2006) 247-251
23. Yoon S.W., Park W.H., Baek S.H., and Kong S.M. Thicknesses of macular retinal layer and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in patients with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Korean J Ophthalmol 19 (2005) 62-67
24. Yen M.Y., Cheng C.Y., and Wang A.G. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in unilateral amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 2224-2230