New power generation technology options under the greenhouse gases mitigation scenario in China

Energy Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 2440-2449

  Liu, Qiang ^a,b   Shi, Minjun ^a   Jiang, Kejun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b Energy Research Institute   (China)

Author keywords

Greenhouse gas; Mitigation scenario; Power generation technology

Indexed keywords

ADOPTING POLICIES; ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES; BIO-MASS ENERGIES; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; GHG EMISSIONS; GHG MITIGATIONS; GLOBAL ISSUES; GREEN HOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GAS; HIGH EFFICIENCIES; LONG TERMS; MITIGATION SCENARIO; NUCLEAR POWER; POWER GENERATION TECHNOLOGY; RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES; SHORT TERMS; SOLAR POWER; TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS;

BIOMASS; CLIMATOLOGY; COAL STORAGE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GAS ABSORPTION; GAS EMISSIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; GREENHOUSES; LEAKAGE (FLUID); TECHNOLOGY;

SOLAR ENERGY;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; POWER GENERATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST;

EID: 64749096161     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.044     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. China Electricity Power Statistic Yearbook 2006, 2006. Electricity Publish House, China.
2. Christou C., et al. Assessment of integrated gasification combined cycle technology competitiveness. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12 (2008) 2459-2471
3. IEA. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy (2000), OECD/IEA, Paris, France
4. The Institute of Energy Economics of Japan. Handbook of Energy and Economy Statistic in Japan (2006), The Energy Conservation Center of Japan, Japan
5. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2007 (2007), OECD/IEA, Paris, France
6. IPCC. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000), Cambridge University Press, UK
7. IPCC. Climate change 2007 mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), Cambridge University Press, UK
8. Kypreos S. Modeling experience curves in MERGE (model for evaluating regional and global effects). Energy 30 (2005) 2721-2737
9. Li, J.F., et al. The Report of Wind Power Development in China (2007), China Environmental Science Press, Beijing
10. Liu T.L. Supercritical and ultra-supercritical technique and development thereof. Guangdong Electric Power 2 1 (2007) 19-22
11. Masui T. Policy evaluations under environmental constraints using a computable general equilibrium model. European Journal of Operational Research 166 (2005) 843-855
12. McDonald A., and Schrattenholzer L. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29 (2001) 255-261
13. In: Metz B., et al. (Ed). Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Miketa A., and Schrattenholzer L. Experiments with a methodology to model the role of R&D expenditures in energy technology learning processes: first results. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1679-1692
15. In: Nakicenovic N., Grubler A., and McDonald A. (Eds). Global Energy Perspectives (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Nakicenovic N., et al. Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES), A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. National Development and Reform Commission of China, 2007. China National Middle- and Long-term Plan for Renewable Energy.
18. Nemet, G.F., 2006. Behind the learning curve: quantifying the sources of cost reductions in photovoltaics. Report. University of California, CA, USA.
19. Rezaiyan, J., McVeigh, J., Menendez, J., 2005. Assessing the economic potential of IGCC innovation with liquids sparing. Final Report. Princeton Energy Resources International, LLC (PERI). Rockville, MD, USA.
20. Rubin E.S., et al. Learning curves for environmental technology and their importance for climate policy analysis. Energy 29 (2004) 1551-1559
21. Seebregts, A.J., et al., 1999. Endogenous technological change in energy system models. Project Report. ECN-C--99-025. PSI & IIASA, Austria.
22. Söderholm P., and Sundqvist T. The empirical challenges of measuring technology learning in the renewable energy sector. Renewable Energy 32 15 (2007) 2559-2578
23. Strubegger, M., Totschnig, G., Zhu B., 2004. MESSAGE: a technical model description. Working Paper. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
24. Xu, S.S., 2006. Current situation and future development of IGCC in China. Presented at the IGCC International Workshop. Beijing, China.
25. Xu, Y., Jiang, K., Masui, T., 2008. CGE Linkage with AIM/Enduse: assessing energy intensity reduction target in China. Presentation in the International Energy Workshop 2008. IEA, Paris.
26. 2 control policies: application of AIM/CGE model to China. European Journal of Operational Research, In Press, doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.048.
27. Yan H.Q., and Chen JP. The developing thermal power generation equipment of China. Electric Equipment 1 (2008) 1-6
28. Yang X.Z. Developing of supercritical unit in China. Electricity Exploitation and Design 1 (2007) 27-30
29. Yeh S., and Rubin E.S. A centurial history of technological change and learning curves for pulverized coal-fired utility boilers. Energy 32 (2007) 1996-2005
30. Zheng Z.N., and Liu D.S. Learning curve model of solar PV modules and policy implication for china. ACTA Energiae Solaris Sinica 1 (2005) 93-97