Cap and trade climate policy and U.S. economic adjustments

Journal of Policy Modeling

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 362-381

  Jorgenson, Dale ^a   Goettle, Richard ^b   Ho, Mun Sing ^a   Wilcoxen, Peter ^c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cap and trade; Climate policy; Economic costs; General equilibrium; Permit prices

Indexed keywords

EID: 64749094337     PISSN: 01618938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2008.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Delhotal K., de la Chesnaye F.C., Gardiner A., Bates J., and Sankovski A. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from waste, energy and industry (2005), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Communication from Eric Smith, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, Climate Economic Branch, Washington, DC
2. The Economist. Sins of emission. 15. Upset about offsets. 53-54 (2006) (August 5th-11th)
3. Fullerton, D., & Metcalf, G. (2001, March). Cap and trade policies in the presence of monopoly and distortionary taxes. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 72. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
4. Goulder L.H. Energy taxes: Traditional efficiency effects and environmental implications. In: Poterba J.M. (Ed). National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Tax policy and the economy Vol. 8 (1994), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 105-158
5. Goulder L.H. Induced technical change and climate policy (2004, October), Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA
6. Jorgenson D.W., and Yun K.-Y. The excess burden of U.S. taxation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 6 4 (1991) 487-509
7. Jorgenson D.W., Goettle R.J., Wilcoxen P.J., and Ho M.S. The role of substitution in understanding the costs of climate change policy (2000, September), Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA
8. Jorgenson D.W., Goettle R.J., Hurd B.S., Smith J.B., Chestnut L.G., and Mills D.M. The U.S. market consequences of global climate change (2004, April), Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA
9. Jorgenson D.W., Goettle R.J., Wilcoxen P.J., and Ho M.S. The economic costs of a market-based climate\policy (2008, June), Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA
10. Jorgenson, D. W., & Jin, H. (2005). State-space modeling of endogenous innovation in the U.S. economy. Working paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
11. Jorgenson, D. W., & Jin, H. (2006). Econometric modeling of technical change. Presented at the 20th Anniversary Symposium of the Korean Econometric Society. Seoul National University, 19 July, Revised 22 August. http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/jorgenson/papers/papers.html.
12. Nordhaus W.D. Modeling induced innovation in climate change policy. In: Grubler A., Nakicenovic N., and Nordhaus W.D. (Eds). Modeling induced innovation in climate change policy (2002), Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 259-290 (Prepublication Version)
13. Ottinger-Schaefer D., Godwin D., and Harnish J. Estimating future emissions and potential reductions of HFCs, PFCs, and SF6 (2004), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Communication from Eric Smith, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, Climate Economic Branch, Washington, DC
14. Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. M., Jacoby, H. D., Ellerman, A. D., & Tay, K. H. (2003, June). Emissions trading to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States: The McCain-Leiberman proposal. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 97. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
15. Popp D. The effect of new technology on energy consumption. Resource and Energy Economics 23 3 (2001) 215-239
16. Popp D. Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review 92 1 (2002) 160-180
17. Ross M.T., Murray B.C., Beach R.H., and Depro B.M. State-level economic impacts of a national climate change policy (2008, April), Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA
18. Russek F.S. Labor supply and taxes. CBO memorandum (1996), Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC
19. Scheehle E., and Kruger D. Methane and nitrous oxide baselines and projections (2005), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Communication from Eric Smith, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, Climate Economic Branch, Washington, DC
20. Smith, E. (2005). International marginal abatement cost schedules from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's (PNNL's) second generation model (SGM). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Communication from Eric Smith, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, Climate Economic Branch.
21. Smith J.B. A synthesis of potential climate change impacts on the United States (2004 April), Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA
22. Stavins R.N., and Richards K.R. The cost of U.S. forest-based carbon sequestration (2005 January), Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA
23. Tuladhar S.D., and Wilcoxen P.J. An econometric look at the double dividend hypothesis. National tax association proceedings 1998 (1999) 57-62
24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2004, April). Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2002. EPA 430-R-04-003. Washington, DC.
25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2008). Follow "Related Links" for Senate Bills S.280 (The Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act of 2007), S.1766 (The Low Carbon Economy Act of 2007) and S.2191 (The Climate Security Act of 2008) at http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/economics.
26. Wing, I. S. (2003, September). Induced technical change and the cost of climate policy. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 102. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
27. Wing, I. S., & Eckhaus, R. S. (2004, September). Explaining long-run changes in the energy intensity of the U.S. economy. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 116. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.