Comparison of delayed enhancement patterns on multislice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocardial infarction

Heart

Volumn 95, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 624-629

  Habis, M ^a,c   Capderou, A ^b   Sigal Cinqualbre, A ^c   Ghostine, S ^a   Rahal, S ^a   Riou, J Y ^c   Brenot, P ^c   Angel, C Y ^c   Paul, J F ^c  

^a Lannelongue Le Plessis   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c CENTRE CHIRURGICAL MARIE LANNELONGUE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 64749094100     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2008.144097     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Tarantini G, Razzolini R, Cacciavillani L, et al. Influence of transmurality, infarct size, and severe microvascular obstruction on left ventricular remodeling and function after primary coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1033-40.
2. Bolognese L, Cerisano G, Buonamici, et al. Influence of infarct-zone viability on left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1997;96:3353-9.
3. Ørn S, Manhenke C, Anand IS, et al. Effect of left ventricular scar size, location, and transmurality on left ventricular remodeling with healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1109-14.
4. Chareonthaitawee P, Christian TF, Hirose K, et al. Relation of initial infarct size to extent of left ventricular remodeling in the year after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:567- 73.
5. Kaandorp TAM, Lamb HJ, Viergever EP, et al. Scar tissue on contrast-enhanced MRI predicts left ventricular remodelling after acute infarction. Heart 2007;93:375-6.
6. Miller TD, Hodge DO, Sutton JM, et al. Usefulness of technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size in predicting posthospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:1491- 3.
7. Miller TD, Christian TF, Hodge DO, et al. Comparison of acute myocardial infarct size to two-year mortality in patients <65 to those >65 years of age. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:1170-5.
8. Lima JAC, Becker LC, Melin JA, et al. Impaired thickening of nonischemic myocardium during acute regional ischemia in the dog. Circulation 1985;71:1048-59.
9. Yang Z, Berr SS, Gilson WD, et al. Simultaneous evaluation of infarct size and cardiac function in intact mice by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals contractile dysfunction in noninfarcted regions early after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004;109:1161-7.
10. Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G, et al. Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function. Circulation 2001;104:1101-7.
11. Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, et al. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;106:1083-9.
12. Wu KC, Lima JAC. Nonivasive imaging of myocardial viability. Current techniques and future developments. Circ Res 2003;93:1146- 58.
13. Nelson C, McCrohon J, Khafagi F, et al. Impact of scar thickness on the assessment of viability using dobutamine echocardiography and thallium single-photon emission computed tomography. A comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1248-56.
14. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-53.
15. Mahrholdt H, Klem I, Sechtem U. Cardiovascular MRI for detection of myocardial viability and ischaemia. Heart 2007;93:122-9.
16. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MAS, Silva C, et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction. Characterisation of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 2006;113:394-404.
17. Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, et al. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:144-52.
18. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:2042-7.
19. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography. Comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 2006;113:823-33.
20. Habis M, Capderou A, Ghostine S, et al. Acute myocardial infarction early viability assessment by 64 slice computed tomography immediately following coronary angiography. Comparison with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1178-85.
21. Sato A, Hiroe M, Nozato T, et al. Early validation study of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability and the prediction of left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2008;29:490-8.
22. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the cardiac imaging committee of the council on clinical cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-42.
23. Rochitte CE, Lima JAC, Bluemke DA, et al. Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;98:1006-14.
24. Gibbons RJ, Miller TD, Christian TF. Infarct size measured by single photon emission computed tomographic imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi. A measure of the efficacy of therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;101:101-8.
25. Gibbons RJ, Valeti US, Araoz PA, et al. The quantification of infarct size. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1533-42.
26. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:765-72.
27. Ibrahim T, Bülow HP, Hackl T, et al. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:208-16.
28. Selvanayagam JB, Porto I, Channon K, et al. Troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention directly represents the extent of irreversible myocardial injury. Insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2005;111:1027-32.
29. Baks T, Van Geuns RJ, Biagini E, et al. Effects of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction on early and late infarct size and left ventricular wall characteristics. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:40-4.
30. Koyama Y, Matsuoka H, Mochizuki T, et al. Assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction with two-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT: prediction of left ventricular function and wall thickness. Radiology 2005;235:804-11.