Perspective and perspectivation in discourse: An introduction

Human Cognitive Processing

Volumn 9, Issue , 2002, Pages 1-11

  Graumann, Carl F ^a   Kallmeyer, Werner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64749087856     PISSN: 13876724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/hcp.9.01gra     Document Type: Editorial

References (46)

1. Auer, Peter & Aldo di Luzio (Eds.). (1992). The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Bakhtin, Mikail (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: Texas University Press.
3. Baumeister, Roy F., Arlene Stillwell, & Sara R. Wotman (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 994-1005.
4. Canisius, Peter (Ed.). (1987). Perspektivität in Sprache und Text. Bochum: Brockmeyer. 2nd, enlarged edition Peter Canisius & Manfred Gerlach (Ed.), 1993.
5. Chafe, Wallace L. (1976). Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Ch. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 26-56). New York: Academic Press.
6. Czyzewski, Marek, Elisabeth Gülich, Heiko Hausendorf, & Marie Kastner (Eds.). (1995). Nationale Selbst- und Fremdbilder im Gespräch. Kommunikative Prozesse nach der Widervereinigung Deutschlands und dem Systemwandel in Ostmitteleuropa. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
7. Fiedler, Klaus & Semin, Gün R. (1992). Attribution and language as a socio-cognitive environment. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 79-101). London: Sage
8. Fillmore, Charles (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 1-88). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9. Firbas, Jan (1992). Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Graumann, Carl F. (1995). Discriminatory discourse. Patterns of Prejudice, 29, 69-83.
11. Graumann, Carl F. (1998). Verbal discrimination: A neglected chapter in the social psychology of aggression. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28, 41-61.
12. Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Gumperz, John J. (1992a). Contextualization revisited. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The Contextualization of Language (pp. 39-53). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
14. Gumperz, John J. (1992b). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & Ch. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an Interpretive Phenomenon (pp. 29-252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Husserl, Edmund (1950). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge [Husserliana, Vol. 1]. Haag: Nijhoff.
16. Iser, Wolfgang (1972). Der implizite Leser. München: Fink.
17. Jones, Edward E. & Richard E. Nisbett (1971). The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior. New York: General Learning Press.
18. Kallmeyer, Werner (1979). Kritische Momente. Zur Konversationsanalyse von Interaktionsstörungen. In W. Frier & G. Labroisse (Eds.), Grundfragen der Textwissenschaft. Linguistische und literaturwissenschaftliche Aspekte (pp. 59-109). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
19. Kallmeyer, Werner (Ed.). (1996). Gesprächsrhetorik. Rhetorische Verfahren im Gesprächsprozess. Tübingen: Narr.
20. Kallmeyer, Werner & Inken Keim (1994). Bezeichnungen, Typisierung und soziale Kategorien. Untersucht am Beispiel der Ehe in der Filsbachwelt. In W. Kallmeyer (Ed.), Kommunikation in der Stadt. Teil 1: Exemplarische Analysen des Sprachverhaltens in Mannheim (pp. 318-386). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
21. Keim, Inken (1996). Verfahren der Perspektivenabschottung und ihre Auswirkung auf die Dynamik des Argumentierens. In W. Kallmeyer (Ed.), Gesprächsrhetorik. Rhetorische Verfahren im Gesprächsprozess (pp. 191-277). Tübingen: Narr.
22. Klein, Wolfgang & Christiane von Stutterheim (1992). Textstruktur und referentielle Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 86, 76-92.
23. Kuno, Susumu (1972). Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3, 269-320.
24. Kuno, Susumu (1987). Functional Syntax. Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Levelt, Willem J. M. (1986). Zur sprachlichen Abbildung des Raumes: Deiktische und intrinsische Perspektive. In H. G. Bosshardt (Ed.), Perspektiven auf Sprache (pp. 187-211). Berlin: de Gruyter.
26. Levelt, Willlem J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
27. Linell, Per (1998). Approaching dialogue - Talk, interaction, and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Litt, Theodor (1924). Individuum und Gemeinschaft (2nd ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.
29. MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1993). Only words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Mead, George H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Mikula, Gerold (1993). On the experience of injustice. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 223-344.
32. Mummendey, Amélie, Manfred Bornewasser, Gabriele Loeschper, & Volker Linneweber (1982). Aggressiv sind immer die anderen. Plädoyer für eine sozialpsychologische Perspektive in der Aggressionsforschung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 13, 177-193.
33. Mummendey, Amélie, Volker Linneweber, & Gabriele Loeschper (1984). Agression: From act to interaction. In A. Mummendey (Ed.), Social psychology of aggression: From individual behavior to social interaction (pp. 69-106). New York: Springer-Verlag
34. Quasthoff, Uta (1978). The uses of stereotype in everyday argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics, 2, 1-48.
35. Sacks, Harvey (1972a). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. The ethnography of communication (pp. 329-345). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
36. Sacks, Harvey (1972b). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31-74). New York: The Free Press.
37. Sanders, José & Wilbert Spooren (1997). Perspective, subjectivity, and modality form a cognitive linguistic point of view. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redecker, & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 85-112). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
38. Sandig, Barbara (1996). Sprachliche Perspektivierung und perspektivierende Stile. LiLi - Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 26(106), 36-63.
39. Schegloff, Emanuel (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In J. J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. The ethnography of communication (pp. 346-380). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
40. Schütz, Alfred (1962). Collected Papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Nijhoff.
41. Semin, Gün R. & Klaus Fiedler (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications, and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 1-30.
42. Stanzel, Franz K. (1979). Theorie des Erzählens. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. English version (1984). A theory of Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. van Dijk, Teun A. (1984). Prejudice and discourse. An analyse of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Watson, David (1982). The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent? Psychological Bulletin, 92, 687-700.
45. Weissenborn, Jürgen & Wolfgang Klein (Eds.). Here and There. Cross-linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
46. Zifonun, Gisela, Ludger Hoffmann, Bruno Strecker, et al. (1997). Grammatik der Deutschen Sprache, 3 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter.