Updating the programming of a precision grip is a function of recent history of available feedback

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 194, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 619-629

  Whitwell, Robert L ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Motor learning; On line control; Prehension; Trial history; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64649090712     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1737-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. C Ansuini L Giosa L Turella G Altoè U Castiello 2008 An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping Exp Brain Res 185 111 119
2. Barden JM, Balyk R, Raso VJ, Moreau M, Bagnall K (2005) Repetitive pointing to remembered proprioceptive targets improves 3D hand positioning accuracy. Hum Mov Sci 24:184-205
3. Binsted G, Rolheiser TM, Chua R (2006) Decay in visuomotor representations during manual aiming. J Mot Behav 38:82-87
4. RJ Bootsma RG Marteniuk CL [tmp] MacKenzie FTJM Zaal 1994 The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics Exp Brain Res 98 535 541
5. DT Cheng M Luis L Tremblay 2008 Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability Exp Brain Res 189 403 410
6. Dixon P, Glover S (2004) Action and memory. In: Ross BH (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 45, pp 143-172
7. T Fukui T Inui 2006 The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping Hum Mov Sci 25 349 371
8. MA Goodale AD Milner 1992 Separate visual pathways for perception and action Trends Neurosci 15 20 25
9. LS Jakobson MA Goodale 1991 Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension Exp Brain Res 86 199 208
10. SA Jax DA Rosenbaum 2007 Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence that The dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33 425 441
11. Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA (2008) Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia (in press)
12. GR Loftus MEJ Masson 1994 Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs Psychon Bull Rev 1 476 490
13. MEJ Masson GR Loftus 2003 Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation Can J Exp Psychol 57 203 220
14. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
15. RC Oldfield 1971 The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologia 9 2028 2031
16. DA Rosenbaum RJ Meulenbroek J Vaughan C Jansen 2001 Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping Psychol Rev 108 709 734
17. R Shadmehr JW Krakauer 2008 A computational neuroanatomy for motor control Exp Brain Res 185 359 381
18. JBJ Smeets E Brenner 1999 A new view on grasping Motor Control 3 237 271
19. JBJ Smeets E Brenner 2001 Independent movements of the digits in grasping Exp Brain Res 139 92 100
20. JBJ Smeets JJ van den Dobbelsteen DDJ de Grave RJ van Beers E Brenner 2006 Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 18781 18786
21. E Todorov MI Jordon 2002 Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor control Nat Neurosci 5 1226 1235
22. J Trommershauser J Mattis LT Maloney MS Landy 2006 Limits to human movement planning with delayed and unpredictable onset of needed information Exp Brain Res 175 276 284
23. RL Whitwell L Lambert MA Goodale 2008 Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension Exp Brain Res 188 603 611