Comparison between EMINENT and other energy technology assessment tools

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 907-910

  Segurado, Raquel ^a   Pereira, Sandrina ^a   Pipio, Ana ^a   Alves, Luís ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Assessment tools; Early stage technologies; EMINENT; Energy models; Energy technologies

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT TOOLS; EARLY STAGE TECHNOLOGIES; EMINENT; ENERGY MODELS; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 64549158903     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. European Commission. An energy policy for Europe, 2007. Retrieved March 18, 2008. http://EU.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/documents_en.htm.
2. European Commission. A European strategic energy technology plan - towards a low carbon future, 2007. Retrieved March 18, 2008. http://EU.europa.eu/energy/res/setplan.
3. Klemeš J, Bulatov I, Koppejan J. Novel energy saving technologies evaluation tool. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2008, doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.07.005.
4. Jansen P., Koppejan J., Hetland J., Klemeš J., Phuengphaeng T., Pipio A., et al. EMINENT accelerates market introduction of promising early stage technologies for transport and energy. Chemical Engineering Transactions 5 (2004) 187-192
5. HOMER - The optimisation model for distributed power. Accessed on January 30, 2008. http://www.nrel.gov/homer.
6. HYDROGEMS - Hydrogen energy models. Accessed on January 30, 2008. http://www.hydrogems.no.
7. RETScreen Clean Energy Project Analysis Software. Accessed on January 30, 2008. http://www.retscreen.net.
8. Lund H., Duić N., Krajačić G., and Carvalho M.G. Two sustainable energy system analysis models: a comparison of methodologies and results. Energy 32 (2007) 948-954
9. Strubegger M. CO2DB software, carbon dioxide (technology) database, Users Manual, Version 3.0 (2003), IIASA
10. Seebregts J, Goldstein G, Smekens K. Energy/environmental modelling with the MARKAL family of models. Retrieved February 14, 2008. http://www.gerad.ca/fichierspdf/rx01039.pdf.
11. Martinsen D, Krey V, Markewitz P, Vögele S. A new dynamical bottom-up energy model for Germany model structure and model results. Retrieved January 30, 2008. http://www.saee.ch/saee2004/Martinsen_dag.pdf.
12. Agator JM. Decision aiding tool E3 database for energetic, emissions-related and economic regional evaluation of hydrogen fuel chains. First European Hydrogen Energy Conference, Grenoble, France, 2003.
13. World Bank on Tools for Assessment: Models and Databases. Accessed on January 30, 2008. http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/em/power/EA/methods/tools.stm.
14. Schrattenholzer L. Energy planning methodologies and tools (2005), IIASA. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Documents/RP-05-002.pdf Retrieved March 20, 2008
15. COMMEND. Accessed on January 30, 2008. http://www.energycommunity.org/default.asp?action=71.
16. Barroso J. SPEEUH/08/34, "20 20 by 2020: Europe's Climate Change Opportunity". Retrieved March 18, 2008. www.europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEEUH/08/34&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en