Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1143-1158

  Phillips, Camilo ^a   Hashash, Youssef M A ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Hysteretic damping; Masing rules; Nonlinear site response analysis; Small strain damping

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EVENTS; GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND-SHAKING; HIGH FREQUENCIES; HYSTERETIC DAMPING; HYSTERETIC RESPONSE; LABORATORY TESTS; LARGE STRAINS; MASING RULES; MODULUS REDUCTIONS; NONLINEAR SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS; NONLINEARITY OF SOILS; ONE-DIMENSIONAL; REDUCTION FACTORS; SEISMIC EVENTS; SITE EFFECTS; SITE RESPONSE; SMALL STRAIN DAMPING; VISCOUS DAMPING MATRICES;

CURVE FITTING; EARTHQUAKES; ENERGY DISSIPATION; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; GEOLOGIC MODELS; HYSTERESIS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; SOILS; STIFFNESS; STRAIN;

DAMPING;

CYCLIC LOADING; DAMPING; ENERGY DISSIPATION; GROUND MOTION; HYSTERESIS; MATRIX; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHEAR STRAIN; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 64549138406     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Schnabel PB, Lysmer JL, Seed HB. SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. In: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 1972.
2. Kramer S.L. Geotechnical earthquake engineering Vol. xviii (1996), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ p. 653
3. Newmark N.M. A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 85 (1959) 67-94
4. Lee MK, Finn WDL. DESRA-2, Dynamic effective stress response analysis of soil deposits with energy transmitting boundary including assessment of liquefaction potential. In: Soil Mechanics Series, No. 36, Vol. 36, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1978.
5. Matasovic N. Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1993.
6. Hashash YMA. DEEPSOIL V 2.6, tutorial and user manual. 2002-2005. In: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana Illinois, 2005, p. 49.
7. Masing G. Eignespannungen und verfestigung beim messing. In: Second International Congress on Applied Mechanics, Zurich, Switzerland, 1926, pp. 332-335.
8. Park D., and Hashash Y.M.A. Soil damping formulation in nonlinear time domain site response analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8 2 (2004) 249-274
9. Kwok A.O.L., Stewart J.P., Hashash Y.M.A., Matasovic N., Pyke R., Wang Z., and Yang Z. Use of exact solutions of wave propagation problems to guide implementation of nonlinear, time-domain ground response analysis routines. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 133 11 (2007) 1337-1481
10. Gerolymos N., and Gazetas G. Constitutive model for 1-D cyclic soil behaviour applied to seismic analysis of layered deposits. Soils and Foundation 45 3 (2005) 147-159
11. Pyke R.M. Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division 105 GT6 (1979) 715-726
12. Duncan J.M., and Chang C.-Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 96 SM5 (1970) 1629-1653
13. Pyke R. TESS: a computer program for nonlinear ground response analyses. In: TAGA Engineering Systems and Software, Lafayette, California, 2000.
14. Muravskii G. On description of hysteretic behaviour of materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures 42 (2005) 2625-2644
15. Davidenkov N.N. Energy dissipation in vibrations. Journal of Technical Physics 8 6 (1938)
16. Puzrin A.M., and Burland J.B. A logarithmic stress-strain function for rocks and soils. Geotechnique 46 1 (1996) 157-164
17. Muravskii G., and Frydman S. Site response analysis using a nonlinear hysteretic model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 17 (1998) 227-238
18. Rayleigh J.W.S., and Lindsay R.B. The theory of sound Vol. 2(1) (1945), Dover Publications, New York
19. Lai CG, Rix GJ. Simultaneous inversion of Rayleigh phase velocity and attenuation for near-surface site characterization. In: Georgia Institute of Technology, 1998.
20. Hudson M, Idriss IM, Beikae M. 1994. QUAD4 M-A computer program to evaluate the seismic response of soil structures using finite element procedures and incorporating a compliant base. In: Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA., Davis, CA, 1994.
21. Wilson E. Dynamic analysis by numerical integration. In: Wilson E. (Ed). Technical reports (2005), Computers and Structures Inc., San Francisco, California
22. Clough R.W., and Penzien J. Dynamics of structures Vol. xxii (1993), McGraw-Hill, New York 738 p
23. Liu M., and Gorman D.G. Formulation of Rayleigh damping and its extensions. Computers and Structures 57 2 (1995) 277-285
24. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., and Flannery B.P. Numerical recipes in FORTRAN 77: the art of scientific computing (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK p. 963
25. Park D, Hashash YM. Estimation of non-linear seismic site effects for deep deposits of the Mississippi Embayment. In: Mid America Earthquake Center, Urbana, 2004, p. 276.
26. Darendeli MB. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves, Ph. D., Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
27. Seed H.B., Wong R.T., Idriss I.M., and Tokimatsu K. Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE 112 SM11 (1986)
28. Yamada S., Hyodo M., Orense R.V.D.S., and Hyodo T. Strain-dependent dynamic properties of remolded sand-clay mixtures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 134 7 (2008) 972-981
29. Zekkos D., Bray J.D., and Riemer M.F. Shear modulus and material damping of municipal solid waste based on large-scale cyclic triaxial testing. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 45 1 (2006) 45-58
30. PEER, P.E.E.R.C., PEER Strong Database, in, Vol. 2007 (PEER, 2000).
31. Vucetic M., and Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 117 1 (1991) 87-107
32. Boulanger R.W., Arulnathan R., Harder L.F.J., Torres R.A., and Driller M.W. Dynamic properties of Sherman Island peat. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 124 1 (1998) 12-20
33. Seed HB, Idriss IM. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. College of Engineering University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, 1970, p. 41.
34. Zhang J., Andrus R.D., and Juang C.H. Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 131 4 (2005) 453-460
35. Borja R.I., Lin C.-H., Sama K.M., and Masada G.M. Modelling non-linear ground response of non-liquefiable soils. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 29 1 (2000) 63-83
36. Okur D.V., and Ansal A. Stiffness degradation of natural fine grained soils during cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 9 (2007) 843-854
37. Kramer S.L. Dynamic response of Mercer Slough peat. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 126 6 (2000) 504-510
38. Bozzano F., Caserta A., Govoni A., Marra F., and Martino S. Static and dynamic characterization of alluvial deposits in the Tiber River Valley: new data for assessing potential ground motion in the City of Rome. Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth 113 1 (2008) [art. no. B01303]
39. Crespellani T., Madiai C., Simoni G., and Vanucchi G. Dynamic geotechnical testing and seismic response analyses in two sites of the Commune of Nocera Umbra, Italy. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 35 4 (2001) 39-52
40. Carrubba P., and Maugeri M. Dynamic soil properties from full scale tests with a vibrating foundation. 2nd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering Vol. 1 (1999), Balkema, Lisbon, Portugal pp. 35-40
41. Cardona O.D., and Yamin L.E. Seismic microzonation and estimation of earthquake loss scenarios: integrated risk mitigation project of Bogota, Colombia. Earthquake Spectra 13 4 (1997) 795-813