Imaging of cervical pathology

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 94-111

  Rezvani, Maryam ^a   Shaaban, Akram ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Benign; Cervix; Malignant; MRI; Pathology

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; CONTRAST MEDIUM; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE;

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CYST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISTANT METASTASIS; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; DRUG UPTAKE; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HUMAN; LEIOMYOMA; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENOPATHY; NABOTHIAN CYST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATHOLOGY; PERITONEUM METASTASIS; POLYP; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREGNANCY DISORDER; REVIEW; SMALL CELL CARCINOMA; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX POLYP; UTERINE CERVIX PREGNANCY; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE;

CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UTERINE CERVICAL DISEASES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 64549128699     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31819617f1     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Pannu HK, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of cervical cancer: spectrum of disease. Radiographics. 2001;21: 1155-1168.
2. American Cancer Society. What are the key statistics about cervical cancer? Available at: www.cancer.org. Accessed on: May 20, 2008.
3. Van Nagell JR, Roddick JW, Lowin DM. The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;110:973-978.
4. LaPolla JP, Schlaerth JB, Gaddis O, et al. The influence of surgical staging on the evaluation and treatment of patients with cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1986; 24:194-206.
5. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology. 1988;166:623-631.
6. Yang WT, Lam WWM, Yu MY, et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamicMRimaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:759-766.
7. Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Roed H, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT scanning in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106:29-34.
8. Amit A, BeckD, Lowenstein L, et al. The role of hybrid PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:65-69.
9. Thyagarajan MS, Dobson MJ, Biswas A. Appearance of uterine cervical lymphoma on MRI: a case report and review of the literature. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:512-515.
10. Ab Hamid S, Wastie ML. Primary non- Hodgkin's lymphoma presenting as a uterine cervical mass. Singapore Med J. 2008;49:e73-e75.
11. Yang DH, Kim JK, Kim KW, et al. MRI of small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1255-1258.
12. Metser U, Haider MA, Khalili K, et al. MR imaging findings and patterns of spread in secondary tumor involvement of the uterine body and cervix. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:765-769.
13. Rosenberg RD, Williamson MR. Cervical ectopic pregnancy: avoiding pitfalls in the ultrasonographic diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11:365-367.
14. Hulka CA, Hall DA, McCarthy K, et al. Endometrial polyps, hyperplasia, and carcinoma in postmenopausal women: differentiation with endovaginal sonography. Radiology. 1994;191:755-758.
15. Grasel RP, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, et al. Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology. 2000;214:47-52.