An effective Hamiltonian survey of the anharmonic vibrational state space of SCCl2 up to the dissociation energy

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 130, Issue 13, 2009, Pages

  Chowdary, Praveen D ^a   Gruebele, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL MODELS; ANHARMONIC; DILUTION FACTORS; DISSOCIATION ENERGIES; DISSOCIATION LIMITS; EFFECTIVE HAMILTONIANS; EIGENSTATES; ENERGY INCREASE; FRANCK-CONDON FACTORS; INTRAMOLECULAR VIBRATIONAL ENERGY REDISTRIBUTIONS; MOLECULAR SIZES; QUANTITATIVE MEASURES; SPECTRAL FEATURES; STATE SPACES; VIBRATIONAL STATE;

DISSOCIATION; SURVEYS;

RESONANCE;

EID: 64549113012     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3105989     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. P. D. Chowdary and M. Gruebele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.250603 101, 250603 (2008).
2. P. D. Chowdary and M. Gruebele, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.3038019 130, 024305 (2009).
3. A. Callegari, J. Rebstein, R. Jost, and T. R. Rizzo, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.480058 111, 7359 (1999).
4. A. Callegari, R. Schmied, P. Theule, J. Rebstein, and T. R. Rizzo, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1463-9076 10.1039/b100461l 3, 2245 (2001).
5. Y. S. Choi and C. B. Moore, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.460503 94, 5414 (1991).
6. R. W. Field, S. L. Coy, and S. A. B. Solina, Prog. Theor. Phys. 0033-068X 10.1143/PTPS.116.143 116, 143 (1994).
7. B. Strickler and M. Gruebele, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1463-9076 10.1039/b403114h 6, 3786 (2004).
8. S. Rashev and D. C. Moule, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.2888172 128, 091101 (2008).
9. V. Wong and M. Gruebele, J. Phys. Chem. A 1089-5639 10.1021/jp9919361 103, 10083 (1999).
10. C. Jung, H. S. Taylor, and E. L. Sibert, J. Phys. Chem. A 1089-5639 10.1021/jp055679d 110, 5317 (2006).
11. E. L. Sibert III and M. Gruebele, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.2155432 124, 024317 (2006).
12. K. S. J. Nordholm and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1681624 61, 203 (1974).
13. G. M. Stewart and J. D. McDonald, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.445114 78, 3907 (1983).
14. E. J. Heller, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 0301-7249 10.1039/dc9837500141 75, 141 (1983).
15. M. Gruebele and R. Bigwood, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 0144-235X 10.1080/014423598230117 17, 91 (1998).
16. P. D. Chowdary, B. Strickler, S. Lee, and M. Gruebele, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.12.011 434, 182 (2007).
17. S. Lee, M. Engel, and M. Gruebele, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.12.064 420, 151 (2006).
18. R. Bigwood and M. Gruebele, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00170-9 235, 604 (1995).
19. M. Gruebele, J. Phys. Chem. 0022-3654 10.1021/jp960443i 100, 12183 (1996).
20. R. Bigwood, M. Gruebele, D. M. Leitner, and P. G. Wolynes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5960 95, 5960 (1998).
21. R. L. Sundberg, E. Abramson, J. L. Kinsey, and R. W. Field, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.449561 83, 466 (1985).
22. R. Bigwood, B. Milam, and M. Gruebele, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00190-0 287, 333 (1998).
23. D. E. Logan and P. G. Wolynes, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.458637 93, 4994 (1990).
24. D. F. Heller, K. F. Freed, and W. M. Gelbart, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1677535 56, 2309 (1972).
25. K. G. Kay and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 58, 4852 (1973). 10.1063/1.1679069
26. E. J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. 0021-9606 10.1063/1.439197 72, 1337 (1980).
27. S. A. Rice, Adv. Chem. Phys. 0065-2385 47, 117 (1981). 10.1002/9780470142677.ch2
28. M. Quack, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 0301-7249 75, 359 (1983).
29. A. A. Stuchebrukhov, M. V. Kuzmin, V. N. Bagratashvili, and V. S. Lethokov, Chem. Phys. 0301-0104 10.1016/0301-0104(86)85020-0 107, 429 (1986).
30. D. M. Leitner and P. G. Wolynes, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00614-8 258, 18 (1996).
31. D. M. Leitner and P. G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.216 76, 216 (1996).
32. In Ref. and here, the quantitative definition adopted for "near the edge" is that for a mode involved in a coupling of order n, it must be at least within n/2 of the edge, that is, the quantum number assigned to that mode in a feature state must be n/2.
33. P. Manikandan, A. Sernparithi, and S. Keshavamurthy, J. Phys. Chem. A 75, 523 (1999).
34. D. M. Leitner and P. G. Wolynes, Chem. Phys. Lett. 0009-2614 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01120-2 280, 411 (1997).
35. J. A. Fisher, L. H. Xu, R. D. Suenram, B. Pate, and K. Douglass, J. Mol. Struct. 0022-2860 10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.02.049 795, 143 (2006).