Generalized conformal symmetry and recovery of SO (8) in multiple M2 and D2 branes

Nuclear Physics B

Volumn 816, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 256-277

  Honma, Yoshinori ^a   Iso, Satoshi ^a   Sumitomo, Yoske ^a   Umetsu, Hiroshi ^b   Zhang, Sen ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR STUDIES   (Japan)

^b KUSHIRO NATIONAL COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64449088190     PISSN: 05503213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Bagger J., and Lambert N. Gauge symmetry and supersymmetry of multiple M2-branes. Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 065008. arXiv:0711.0955 [hep-th]
2. Bagger J., and Lambert N. Modeling multiple M2's. Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 045020. arXiv:hep-th/0611108
3. Bagger J., and Lambert N. Comments on multiple M2-branes. JHEP 0802 (2008) 105. arXiv:0712.3738 [hep-th]
4. Gustavsson A. Algebraic structures on parallel M2-branes. arXiv:0709.1260 [hep-th]
5. Gustavsson A. Selfdual strings and loop space Nahm equations. JHEP 0804 (2008) 083. arXiv:0802.3456 [hep-th]
6. Gomis J., Milanesi G., and Russo J.G. Bagger-Lambert theory for general Lie algebras. arXiv:0805.1012 [hep-th]
7. Benvenuti S., Rodriguez-Gomez D., Tonni E., and Verlinde H. N = 8 superconformal gauge theories and M2 branes. arXiv:0805.1087 [hep-th]
8. Ho P.M., Imamura Y., and Matsuo Y. M2 to D2 revisited. arXiv:0805.1202 [hep-th]
9. Aharony O., Bergman O., Jafferis D.L., and Maldacena J. N = 6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals. arXiv:0806.1218 [hep-th]
10. Bandres M.A., Lipstein A.E., and Schwarz J.H. Ghost-free superconformal action for multiple M2-branes. arXiv:0806.0054 [hep-th]
11. Gomis J., Rodriguez-Gomez D., Van Raamsdonk M., and Verlinde H. The superconformal gauge theory on M2-branes. arXiv:0806.0738 [hep-th]
12. Ali-Akbari M., Sheikh-Jabbari M.M., and Simon J. Relaxed three-algebras: Their matrix representations and implications for multi M2-brane theory. arXiv:0807.1570 [hep-th]
13. Mukhi S., and Papageorgakis C. M2 to D2. JHEP 0805 (2008) 085. arXiv:0803.3218 [hep-th]
14. Honma Y., Iso S., Sumitomo Y., and Zhang S. Janus field theories from multiple M2 branes. arXiv:0805.1895 [hep-th]
15. Ezhuthachan B., Mukhi S., and Papageorgakis C. D2 to D2. arXiv:0806.1639 [hep-th]
16. Honma Y., Iso S., Sumitomo Y., and Zhang S. Scaling limit of N = 6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories and Lorentzian Bagger-Lambert theories. arXiv:0806.3498 [hep-th]
17. Verlinde H. D2 or M2? A note on membrane scattering. arXiv:0807.2121 [hep-th]
18. Gomis J., Salim A.J., and Passerini F. Matrix theory of type IIB plane wave from membranes. arXiv:0804.2186 [hep-th]
19. Hosomichi K., Lee K.M., and Lee S. Mass-deformed Bagger-Lambert theory and its BPS objects. arXiv:0804.2519 [hep-th]
20. Blau M., and O'Loughlin M. Multiple M2-branes and plane waves. arXiv:0806.3253 [hep-th]
21. Schwarz J.H. Superconformal Chern-Simons theories. JHEP 0411 (2004) 078. arXiv:hep-th/0411077
22. Gaiotto D., and Yin X. Notes on superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories. JHEP 0708 (2007) 056. arXiv:0704.3740 [hep-th]
23. Bagger J., and Lambert N. Three-algebras and N = 6 Chern-Simons gauge theories. arXiv:0807.0163 [hep-th]
24. Terashima S. On M5-branes in N = 6 membrane action. arXiv:0807.0197 [hep-th]
25. Gomis J., Rodriguez-Gomez D., Van Raamsdonk M., and Verlinde H. A massive study of M2-brane proposals. arXiv:0807.1074 [hep-th]
26. Hanaki K., and Lin H. M2-M5 systems in N = 6 Chern-Simons theory. arXiv:0807.2074 [hep-th]
27. Hosomichi K., Lee K.M., Lee S., Lee S., and Park J. N = 5, 6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories and M2-branes on orbifolds. arXiv:0806.4977 [hep-th]
28. Schnabl M., and Tachikawa Y. Classification of N = 6 superconformal theories of ABJM type. arXiv:0807.1102 [hep-th]
29. Bergshoeff E.A., de Roo M., Hohm O., and Roest D. Multiple membranes from gauged supergravity. arXiv:0806.2584 [hep-th]
30. Bergshoeff E.A., Hohm O., Roest D., Samtleben H., and Sezgin E. The superconformal gaugings in three dimensions. arXiv:0807.2841 [hep-th]
31. Mauri A., and Petkou A.C. arXiv:0806.2270 [hep-th]
32. Bhattacharya J., and Minwalla S. arXiv:0806.3251 [hep-th]
33. Nishioka T., and Takayanagi T. arXiv:0806.3391 [hep-th]
34. Imamura Y., and Kimura K. arXiv:0806.3727 [hep-th]
35. Minahan J.A., and Zarembo K. arXiv:0806.3951 [hep-th]
36. Armoni A., and Naqvi A. arXiv:0806.4068 [hep-th]
37. Hanany A., Mekareeya N., and Zaffaroni A. arXiv:0806.4212 [hep-th]
38. Gaiotto D., Giombi S., and Yin X. arXiv:0806.4589 [hep-th]
39. Ahn C. arXiv:0806.4807 [hep-th]
40. Bedford J., and Berman D. arXiv:0806.4900 [hep-th]
41. Arutyunov G., and Frolov S. arXiv:0806.4940 [hep-th]
42. Stefanski B.j. arXiv:0806.4948 [hep-th]
43. Grignani G., Harmark T., and Orselli M. arXiv:0806.4959 [hep-th]
44. Hosomichi K., Lee K.M., Lee S., Lee S., and Park J. arXiv:0806.4977 [hep-th]
45. Grignani G., Harmark T., Orselli M., and Semenoff G.W. arXiv:0807.0205 [hep-th]
46. Terashima S., and Yagi F. arXiv:0807.0368 [hep-th]
47. Gromov N., and Vieira P. arXiv:0807.0437 [hep-th]
48. Ahn C., and Bozhilov P. arXiv:0807.0566 [hep-th]
49. Gromov N., and Vieira P. arXiv:0807.0777 [hep-th]
50. Chu C.S., Ho P.M., Matsuo Y., and Shiba S. arXiv:0807.0812 [hep-th]
51. Cherkis S., and Samann C. arXiv:0807.0808 [hep-th]
52. Chen B., and Wu J.B. arXiv:0807.0802 [hep-th]
53. Zhou Y. arXiv:0807.0890 [hep-th]
54. Li T., Liu Y., and Xie D. arXiv:0807.1183 [hep-th]
55. Kim N. arXiv:0807.1349 [hep-th]
56. Pang Y., and Wang T. arXiv:0807.1444 [hep-th]
57. Garousi M.R., Ghodsi A., and Khosravi M. arXiv:0807.1478 [hep-th]
58. Hashimoto A., and Ouyang P. arXiv:0807.1500 [hep-th]
59. Astolfi D., Puletti V.G.M., Grignani G., Harmark T., and Orselli M. arXiv:0807.1527 [hep-th]
60. Ahn C., and Nepomechie R.I. arXiv:0807.1924 [hep-th]
61. Bak D., and Rey S.J. arXiv:0807.2063 [hep-th]
62. Imamura Y., and Kimura K. arXiv:0807.2144 [hep-th]
63. Lee B.H., Panigrahi K.L., and Park C. arXiv:0807.2559 [hep-th]
64. Ahn C., Bozhilov P., and Rashkov R.C. arXiv:0807.3134 [hep-th]
65. Krishnan C., and Maccaferri C. JHEP 0807 (2008) 005. arXiv:0805.3125 [hep-th]
66. Inönü E., and Wigner E.P. On the contraction of groups and their representations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 39 (1953) 510
67. Jevicki A., Kazama Y., and Yoneya T. Generalized conformal symmetry in D-brane matrix models. Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 066001. arXiv:hep-th/9810146
68. Bandres M.A., Lipstein A.E., and Schwarz J.H. Studies of the ABJM theory in a formulation with manifest SU (4) R-symmetry. arXiv:0807.0880 [hep-th]
69. 3 correspondence. arXiv:0806.1519 [hep-th]
70. Bandres M.A., Lipstein A.E., and Schwarz J.H. N = 8 superconformal Chern-Simons theories. JHEP 0805 (2008) 025. arXiv:0803.3242 [hep-th]
71. Witten E. String theory dynamics in various dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995) 85. arXiv:hep-th/9503124
72. Banerjee S., and Sen A. Interpreting the M2-brane action. arXiv:0805.3930 [hep-th]
73. Cecotti S., and Sen A. Coulomb branch of the Lorentzian three algebra theory. arXiv:0806.1990 [hep-th]
74. Aharony O., Gubser S.S., Maldacena J.M., Ooguri H., and Oz Y. Large N field theories, string theory and gravity. Phys. Rep. 323 (2000) 183. arXiv:hep-th/9905111