Is the patient state analyzer with the PSArray2 a cost-effective alternative to the bispectral index monitor during the perioperative period?

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1429-1435

  White, Paul F ^a   Tang, Jun ^a   Ma, Hong ^a   Wender, Ronald H ^b   Sloninsky, Alexander ^b   Kariger, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CISATRACURIUM; DESFLURANE; FENTANYL; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; CAUTERIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTRONIC SENSOR; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; MONITOR; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT STATE ANALYZER; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNCONSCIOUSNESS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; ARTIFACTS; CONSCIOUSNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; ISOFLURANE; LAPAROSCOPY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 6444233480     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132784.57622.CC     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tempe D. In search of a reliable awareness monitor. Anesth Analg 2001;92:801-4.
2. Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC. Monitors of depth of anesthesia, quo vadis? Anesthesiology 2002;96:784-7.
3. Sebel PS, Lang E, Rampil IJ, et al. A multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic effect. Anesth Analg 1997;84:891-9.
4. Drover DR, Lemmens HJ, Pierce ET, et al. Patient state index: titration of delivery and recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2002;97:82-9.
5. Recart A, White PF, Wang A, et al. Effect of auditory evoked potential index monitoring on anesthetic requirements and recovery profile after laparoscopic surgery: a clinical utility study. Anesthesiology 2003;99:813-8.
6. Levy WJ, Shapiro HM, Maruchak G, Meathe E. Automated EEG processing for intraoperative monitoring: a comparison of techniques. Anesthesiology 1980;53:223-36.
7. Rampil IJ, Matteo RS. Changes in EEG spectral edge frequency correlate with the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Anesthesiology 1987;67:139-42.
8. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998;89:980-1002.
9. Flaishon R, Windsor A, Sigl J, Sebel PS. Recovery of consciousness after thiopental or propofol: bispectral index and the isolated forearm technique. Anesthesiology 1997;86:613-9.
10. Liu J, Singh H, White PF. Electroencephalogram bispectral analysis predicts the depth of midazolam-induced sedation. Anesthesiology 1996;84:64-9.
11. Liu J, Singh H, White PF. Electroencephalographic bispectral index correlates with intraoperative recall and depth of propofol-induced sedation. Anesth Analg 1997;84:185-9.
12. Prichep LS, John ER, Gugino LD, et al. Quantitative EEG assessment of changes in the level of the sedation/hypnosis during surgery under general anesthesia: the Patient State Index (PSI). In: Jordan C, Vaughan DJA, Newton DEF, eds. London: Imperial College Press, 2000:97-107.
13. Chen X, Tang J, White PF, et al. A comparison of patient state index and bispectral index values during the perioperative period. Anesth Analg 2002;95:1669-74.
14. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36.
15. Tinker JH, Sharbrough FW, Michenfelder JD. Anterior shift of the dominant EEG rhythm during anesthesia in the Java monkey: correlation with anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology 1977;46:252-9.
16. Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, et al. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:836-47.
17. Can TJ, Glass PS, Windsor A, et al. Bispectral index monitoring allows faster emergence and improved recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:808-15.
18. Song D, Joshi GP, White PF. Titration of volatile anesthetics using bispectral index facilitates recovery after ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997;87:842-8.
19. Recart A, Gasanova I, White PF, et al. The effect of cerebral monitoring on recovery after general anesthesia: a comparison of the auditory evoked potential and bispectral index devices with standard clinical practice. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1667-74.
20. White PF, Ma H, Tang J, et al. Does the use of electroencephalographic bispectral index or auditory evoked potential index monitoring facilitate recovery after desflurane anesthesia in the ambulatory setting? Anesthesiology 2004;100:811-7.
21. Gugino LD, Chabot RJ, Prichep LS, et al. Quantitative EEG changes associated with loss and return of consciousness in healthy adult volunteers anesthetized with propofol or sevoflurane. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:421-8.
22. Chabot RJ, Gugino LD, Aglio LS, et al. QEEG and neuropsychological profiles of patients after undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgical procedures. Clin Electroencephalogr 1997;28: 98-105.
23. Johansen JW, Sebel PS. Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1336-44.
24. Vuyk J, Lichtenbelt BJ, Vieveen J, et al. Low bispectral index values in awake volunteers receiving a combination of propofol and midazolam. Anesthesiology 2004;100:179-81.