메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 100-114

An exploration of participants' treatment preferences in a partial RCT

Author keywords

Partial RCT; Random assignment; Treatment preference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSOMNIA; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; REVIEW;

EID: 6444230442     PISSN: 08445621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (9)

References (36)
  • 1
    • 0035256532 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patients' and relatives' experiences and perceptions of "good" and "not so good" quality care
    • Attree, M. (2001). Patients' and relatives' experiences and perceptions of "good" and "not so good" quality care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(4), 456-466.
    • (2001) Journal of Advanced Nursing , vol.33 , Issue.4 , pp. 456-466
    • Attree, M.1
  • 3
    • 0034853556 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk
    • Bowling, A., & Ebraham, S. (2001). Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk. Quality in Health Care, 10(Suppl 1), 12-18.
    • (2001) Quality in Health Care , vol.10 , Issue.1 SUPPL. , pp. 12-18
    • Bowling, A.1    Ebraham, S.2
  • 4
    • 0027406193 scopus 로고
    • Designing medical and educational intervention studies
    • Bradley, C. (1993). Designing medical and educational intervention studies. Diabetes Care, 16, 509-518.
    • (1993) Diabetes Care , vol.16 , pp. 509-518
    • Bradley, C.1
  • 5
    • 0024980660 scopus 로고
    • Patient preferences and randomized clinical trials
    • Brewin, C. R., & Bradley, C. (1989). Patient preferences and randomized clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 299, 313-315.
    • (1989) British Medical Journal , vol.299 , pp. 313-315
    • Brewin, C.R.1    Bradley, C.2
  • 6
    • 0030228467 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient participation: A concept analysis
    • Cahill, J. (1996). Patient participation: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 561-571.
    • (1996) Journal of Advanced Nursing , vol.24 , pp. 561-571
    • Cahill, J.1
  • 7
    • 0037407375 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: Implications for internal validity
    • Corrigan, P. W., & Salzer, M. S. (2003).The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: Implications for internal validity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26, 109-121.
    • (2003) Evaluation and Program Planning , vol.26 , pp. 109-121
    • Corrigan, P.W.1    Salzer, M.S.2
  • 8
    • 0036595507 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Partial randomization design in a support group intervention study
    • Coward, D. (2002). Partial randomization design in a support group intervention study. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24, 406-421.
    • (2002) Western Journal of Nursing Research , vol.24 , pp. 406-421
    • Coward, D.1
  • 9
    • 0033807896 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Attitudes toward and participation in randomized clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literature
    • Ellis, P. M. (2000). Attitudes toward and participation in randomized clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literature. Annals of Oncology, 11, 939-945.
    • (2000) Annals of Oncology , vol.11 , pp. 939-945
    • Ellis, P.M.1
  • 10
    • 0033398151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patients' beliefs about treatment: The hidden determinant of treatment outcome?
    • Horne, R. (1999). Patients' beliefs about treatment: The hidden determinant of treatment outcome? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 47(6), 491-495.
    • (1999) Journal of Psychosomatic Research , vol.47 , Issue.6 , pp. 491-495
    • Horne, R.1
  • 11
    • 0034025634 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy
    • Jenkins, V., & Fallowfield, L. (2000). Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy. British Journal of Cancer, 82(11), 1783-1788.
    • (2000) British Journal of Cancer , vol.82 , Issue.11 , pp. 1783-1788
    • Jenkins, V.1    Fallowfield, L.2
  • 12
    • 0033669199 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effects of patients' and practitioners' preferences on randomized clinical trials
    • King, M. (2000). The effects of patients' and practitioners' preferences on randomized clinical trials. Palliative Medicine, 14, 539-542.
    • (2000) Palliative Medicine , vol.14 , pp. 539-542
    • King, M.1
  • 14
    • 0034098257 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Incorporating patient preferences into randomized trials
    • Lambert, M. F., & Wood, J. (2000). Incorporating patient preferences into randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 163-166.
    • (2000) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.53 , pp. 163-166
    • Lambert, M.F.1    Wood, J.2
  • 15
    • 0035488282 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining patient-perceived quality of nursing care
    • Larrabee, J. H., & Bolden, L. V. (2001). Defining patient-perceived quality of nursing care. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 16(1), 34-60.
    • (2001) Journal of Nursing Care Quality , vol.16 , Issue.1 , pp. 34-60
    • Larrabee, J.H.1    Bolden, L.V.2
  • 18
    • 0642372694 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Researching nursing practice: Does person-centredness matter?
    • McCormack, B. (2003). Researching nursing practice: Does person-centredness matter? Nursing Philosophy, 4, 179-188.
    • (2003) Nursing Philosophy , vol.4 , pp. 179-188
    • McCormack, B.1
  • 19
    • 0034856010 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preferences and understanding their effects on health
    • McPherson, K., & Britton, A. (2001). Preferences and understanding their effects on health. Quality in Health Care, 10(Suppl 1), 161-166.
    • (2001) Quality in Health Care , vol.10 , Issue.1 SUPPL. , pp. 161-166
    • McPherson, K.1    Britton, A.2
  • 20
    • 0032482706 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Incorporating patient preferences into clinical trials: Information about patients' preference must be obtained first
    • McPherson, K., & Chalmers, I. (1998). Incorporating patient preferences into clinical trials: Information about patients' preference must be obtained first. British Medical Journal, 317(7150), 78.
    • (1998) British Medical Journal , vol.317 , Issue.7150 , pp. 78
    • McPherson, K.1    Chalmers, I.2
  • 21
    • 0026728375 scopus 로고
    • Patients' acceptance of psychological and pharmacological therapies for insomnia
    • Morin, C. M., Gaulier, B., Barry, T., & Kowatch, R. A. (1992). Patients' acceptance of psychological and pharmacological therapies for insomnia. Sleep, 15, 302-305.
    • (1992) Sleep , vol.15 , pp. 302-305
    • Morin, C.M.1    Gaulier, B.2    Barry, T.3    Kowatch, R.A.4
  • 22
    • 0036373885 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A preliminary report on a patient-preference study to compare treatment options in early prostate cancer
    • North-West Uro-Oncology Group. (2002). A preliminary report on a patient-preference study to compare treatment options in early prostate cancer. BJU International, 90, 253-256.
    • (2002) BJU International , vol.90 , pp. 253-256
  • 23
    • 0037688070 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options
    • O'Connor, A. M., Mulley, A. G., & Wennberg, J. E. Jr. (2003). Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 95(8), 250.
    • (2003) Journal of the National Cancer Institute , vol.95 , Issue.8 , pp. 250
    • O'Connor, A.M.1    Mulley, A.G.2    Wennberg Jr., J.E.3
  • 24
    • 0003174534 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Controversy in managing patients with prostate cancer
    • O'Reilly, P. H., Martin, L., & Collins, G. (1999). Controversy in managing patients with prostate cancer. British Medical Journal, 318, 126.
    • (1999) British Medical Journal , vol.318 , pp. 126
    • O'Reilly, P.H.1    Martin, L.2    Collins, G.3
  • 25
    • 0032240221 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving patient outcomes by including patient preferences in nursing care
    • Ruland, C. M. (1998). Improving patient outcomes by including patient preferences in nursing care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Suppl S, 448-454.
    • (1998) Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , Issue.SUPPL. S , pp. 448-454
    • Ruland, C.M.1
  • 28
    • 0036695527 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The 2 "Es" of research: Efficacy and effectiveness trials
    • Streiner, D. L. (2002). The 2 "Es" of research: Efficacy and effectiveness trials. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47(6), 552-556.
    • (2002) Canadian Journal of Psychiatry , vol.47 , Issue.6 , pp. 552-556
    • Streiner, D.L.1
  • 29
    • 0037351829 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research to improve the quality of care for depression: Alternatives to the simple randomized clinical trial
    • TenHave, T. R., Coyne J., Salzer, M., & Katz, I. (2003). Research to improve the quality of care for depression: Alternatives to the simple randomized clinical trial. General Hospital Psychiatry, 25, 115-123.
    • (2003) General Hospital Psychiatry , vol.25 , pp. 115-123
    • TenHave, T.R.1    Coyne, J.2    Salzer, M.3    Katz, I.4
  • 30
    • 0442278364 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What influences participants' treatment preference and can it influence outcome? Results from a primary care-based ransomised trial for shoulder pain
    • Thomas, E., Craft, P. R., Paterson, S. M., Dziedzic, K., & Hay, E. M. (2004). What influences participants' treatment preference and can it influence outcome? Results from a primary care-based ransomised trial for shoulder pain. British Journal of General Practice, 54, 93-96.
    • (2004) British Journal of General Practice , vol.54 , pp. 93-96
    • Thomas, E.1    Craft, P.R.2    Paterson, S.M.3    Dziedzic, K.4    Hay, E.M.5
  • 32
    • 0032583868 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is a patient preference trial?
    • Torgerson, D. J., & Sibbald, B. (1998). What is a patient preference trial? British Medical Journal, 316(7128), 360.
    • (1998) British Medical Journal , vol.316 , Issue.7128 , pp. 360
    • Torgerson, D.J.1    Sibbald, B.2
  • 33
    • 0141684982 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Practical clinical trials increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy
    • Tunis, S. R., Stryer, D. B., & Clancy, C. M. (2003). Practical clinical trials increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(12), 1624-1632.
    • (2003) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.290 , Issue.12 , pp. 1624-1632
    • Tunis, S.R.1    Stryer, D.B.2    Clancy, C.M.3
  • 34
    • 0035876995 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Treatment preference and patient satisfaction in chronic insomnia
    • Vincent, N., & Lionberg, C. (2001).Treatment preference and patient satisfaction in chronic insomnia. Sleep, 24(4), 411-417.
    • (2001) Sleep , vol.24 , Issue.4 , pp. 411-417
    • Vincent, N.1    Lionberg, C.2
  • 36
    • 0036051697 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The systematic development of nursing interventions
    • Whittemore, R., & Grey, M. (2002). The systematic development of nursing interventions. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(2), 115-120.
    • (2002) Journal of Nursing Scholarship , vol.34 , Issue.2 , pp. 115-120
    • Whittemore, R.1    Grey, M.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.