Task force 1: The ACCF and AHA codes of conduct in human subjects research

Circulation

Volumn 110, Issue 16, 2004, Pages 2512-2516

  Adams, Robert J ^a   Antman, Elliot M ^b   Kavey, Rae Ellen W ^c  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFLICT; ETHICS; EXPERIMENTATION; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 6444225780     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/circ.110.16.2512     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Morin K, Rakatansky H, Riddick FA, Jr., et al. Managing conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical trials. JAMA 2002;287:78-84.
2. Levinsky NG. Non-financial conflicts of interest in research. N Engl J Med 2002;347:759-61.
3. Solov D, McEnery R. Healthy woman died in UH Alzheimer's study. Cleveland Plain Dealer, December 21, 2001:A1.
4. Steinbrook R. Protecting research subjects-the crisis at Johns Hopkins. N Engl J Med 2002;346:716-20.
5. Wentzel M. Toxic dose given UR student. Rochester, NY: Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, 1996.
6. Kizer JR, Cannon CP, McCabe CH, et al. Trends in the use of pharmacotherapies for acute myocardial infarction among physicians who design and/or implement randomized trials versus physicians in routine clinical practice: the MILIS-TIMI experience. Multicenter Investigation on Limitation of Infarct Size-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction. Am Heart J 1999;137:79-92.
7. Katz J. Human experimentation and human rights. St. Louis Univ Law J 1993;38:7-54.
8. Fisher B, Redmond CK. Fraud in breast-cancer trials. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1458-60.
9. Schulz KF. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;274:1456-8.
10. Korn D. Conflicts of interest in biomedical research. JAMA 2000; 284:2234-7.
11. Cech TR, Leonard JS. Science and business. Conflicts of interest-moving beyond disclosure. Science 2001;291:989.
12. La Puma J. Physicians' conflict of interest in post-marketing research: what the public should know, and why industry should tell them. In: Vanderpool HY, editor. Ethics of Research Involving Human Subjects: Facing the 21st Century. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group, Inc., 1996;203-19.
13. Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects. Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press, 2001.
14. Federman DD, Hanna KE, Rodriguez LL. Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press, 2003.
15. AAMC Task Force. Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress I-policy and guidelines for the oversight of individual financial interests in human subjects' research. Acad Med 2003;78: 225-36.
16. AAMC Task Force. Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress II-principles and recommendations for oversight of an institution's financial interests in human subjects' research. Acad Med 2003;78:237-45.
17. Protection of human subjects: Belmont report-ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Fed Regist 1979;44:23192-7.
18. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers on Evidence Models for the Least Burdensome Means to Market. Food and Drug Administration. Available at: www.fda.gov. Last update 1999.
19. Kennedy D. The Lasker Forum on Ethical Challenges in Biomedical Research and Practice. Lasker Foundation. Available at: www. laskerfoundation.org. Last update May 14, 2003.
20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators. 1998 Update, Rockville, MD.
21. Kodish E. Informed consent for pediatric research: is it really possible? J Pediatr 2003;142:89-90.
22. Rossi WC, Reynolds W, Nelson RM. Child assent and parental permission in pediatric research. Theor Med Bioeth 2003;24:131-48.
23. NIH Policy and Guidelines on Inclusion of Children as Participants in Research Involving Human Subjects. March 6, 1998. Available at: http://www.nih.gob/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-024.html. Last update March 6, 2004. Accessed April 14, 2004.
24. Shah S, Whittle A, Wilfond B, Gensler G, Wendler D. How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? JAMA 2004;291:476-82.
25. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders that May Affect Decision-Making Capacity. Available at: www.georgetown.edu. Last update 1998. Accessed August 26, 2004.