|
Volumn 94, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 800-802
|
Rendering unto Caesar?
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AMNION FLUID EMBOLISM;
BRAIN INJURY;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CHILDBIRTH;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DEATH;
DYSTOCIA;
EPISIOTOMY;
FEMALE;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE;
GOVERNMENT;
GYNECOLOGY;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HUMAN;
HYSTERECTOMY;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
LAW SUIT;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
MORBIDITY;
MORTALITY;
NOTE;
PELVIC DISEASE;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PREGNANCY;
PROFIT;
PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT;
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SOUTH AFRICA;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
URINE INCONTINENCE;
UTERUS BLEEDING;
UTERUS PROLAPSE;
VAGINAL DELIVERY;
APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CLINICAL PROTOCOLS;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALPRACTICE;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
PREGNANCY;
PRIVATE SECTOR;
SOUTH AFRICA;
UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES;
|
EID: 6444221047
PISSN: 02569574
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (0)
|