Neuroanatomical corellates of locative prepositions

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 719-749

  Tranel, Daniel ^a,c   Kemmerer, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN REGION; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPOTHESIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; NEUROANATOMY; PARIETAL LOBE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SUPRASYLVIAN GYRUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TELENCEPHALON; WHITE MATTER; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 6444220712     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000627     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Cooper, G., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2683-2690.
2. American Psychological Association (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. Baciu, M., Koenig, O., Vernier, M.-P., Bedoin, N., Rubin, C., & Segebarth, C. (1999). Categorical and coordinate spatial relations: fMRI evidence for hemispheric specialization. Neuro Report, 10 1373-1378.
4. Bennett, D. (1993). There is more to location than prepositions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 239.
5. Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K., Varney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1983). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Benton, A. L., & Tranel, D. (1993). Visuoperceptual, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive disorders. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (3rd ed., pp. 165-213 . New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Bickel, B., & Gaenszle, M. (Eds). (1999). Himalayan space Zurich: Museum of Ethnography.
8. Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., & Garrett, M. F. (Eds.) (1996). Language and space. Cambridge: MIT Press.
9. Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children's spatial semantic categories: Cognitive vs. linguistic determinants. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145-176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Burgess, N., Jeffrey, K. J., & O'Keefe, J. (Eds.) (1999). The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Caplan, D. (1991). Agrammatism is a theoretically coherent aphasic category. Brain and Language, 40, 274-281.
12. Cappa, S. F., Sandrini, M., Rossini, P. M., Sosta, K., & Miniussi, C. (2002). The role of the left frontal lobe in action naming: rTMS evidence. Neurology, 59, 720-723.
13. Chatterjee, A. (2001). Language and space: Some interactions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 55-61.
14. Crawford, L. E., Regier, T., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization. Cognition, 75, 209-235.
15. Damasio, H. (2000). The lesion method in cognitive neuroscience. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 77-102). New York: Elsevier.
16. Damasio, H., & Frank, R. (1992). Three-dimensional in vivo mapping of brain lesions in humans. Archives of Neurology, 49 137-143.
17. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Ponto, L. L. B., Hichwa, R. D., & Damasio, A. R. (2001). Neural correlates of naming actions and of naming spatial relations. NeuroImage, 13, 1053-1064.
18. Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Grabowski, T. J., Adolphs, R., & Damasio, A. R. (2004). Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition, 92, 179-229.
19. Danziger, E. (Ed.) (1998). Language, space, and culture [Special issue]. Ethos, 26(1).
20. Denburg, N. L., & Tranel, D. (2003). Acalculia and disturbances of the body schema. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology, (4th ed., pp. 161-184). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Dirven, R. (1993). Dividing up physical and mental space. In C. Zelinsky-Webbelt (Ed.), The semantics of prepositions (pp. 39-66). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
22. Emmorey, K., Damasio, H., McCullough, S., Grabowski, T., Ponto, L. L. B., Hichwa, R. D., & Bellugi, U. (2002). Neural systems underlying spatial language in American Sign Language. NeuroImage, 17, 812-824.
23. Emmorey, K., Grabowski, T., McCullough, S., Damasio, H., Ponto, L., Hichwa, R., & Bellugi, U. (2003). Neural systems underlying lexical retrieval for sign language. Neuropsychologia, 41, 85-95.
24. Felician, O., Ceccaldi, M., Didic, M., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Poncet, M. (2003). Pointing to body parts: A double dissociation study. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1307-1316.
25. Fiez, J. A., & Tranel, D. (1997). Standardized stimuli and procedures for investigating the retrieval of lexical and conceptual knowledge for actions. Memory and Cognition, 25, 543-569.
26. Frank, R. J., Damasio, H., & Grabowski, T. J. (1997). Brainvox: An interactive, multimodal, visualization and analysis system for neuroanatomical imaging. NeuroImage, 5, 13-30.
27. Friederici, A. D. (1982). Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits: The availability of prepositions. Brain and Language 15, 249-258.
28. Friederici, A. D. (1983). Aphasics' perception of words in sentential context: Some real-time processing evidence. Neuropsychologia, 21, 351-358.
29. Friederici, A. D. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics. Cognition, 19, 133-166.
30. Friederici, A. D., Schönle, P. W., & Garrett, M. F. (1982). Syntactically and semantically based computations: Processing of prepositions in agrammatism. Cortex, 18, 525-534.
31. Froud, K. (2001). Prepositions and the lexical/functional divide. Aphasic evidence. Lingua, 111, 1-28.
32. Garrod, S., Ferrier, G., & Campbell, S. (1999). In and on: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition, 72, 167-89.
33. Gattis, M. (Ed.) (2001). Spatial schemas and abstract thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind (pp. 199-254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Goldenberg, G. (1989). The ability of patients with brain damage to generate mental visual images. Brain, 112, 305-325.
36. Grodzinsky, Y. (1988). Syntactic representations in agrammatic aphasia: The case of prepositions. Language and Speech, 31, 115-134.
37. Grodzinsky, Y. (1991). There is an entity called agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 41, 555-564.
38. Hannay, H. J., Falgout, J. C., Leli, D. A., Katholi, C. R., Halsey, J. H., & Wills, E. (1987). Focal right temporo-occipital blood flow changes associated with Judgment of Line Orientation. Neuropsychologia, 25, 755-63.
39. Haspelmath, M. (1997). From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the worlds languages. Newcastle, UK: Lincom Europa.
40. Haviland, J. B., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.) (1994). Spatial conceptualization in Mayan languages [Special issue]. Linguistics 32.
41. Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Hill, C. (1982). Up/down, front/back, left/right: A contrastive analysis of Hausa and English. In J. Weissenborn & W. Klein (Eds.), Here and there: Crosslinguistic studies on deixis and demonstration (pp. 13-42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Hillis, A. E., Wityk, R. J., Barker, P. B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Neural regions essential for writing verbs. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 19-20.
44. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352-76.
45. Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2000). The neural correlates of language production. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 845-865). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Ivry, R. B., & Robertson, L. C. (1998). The two sides of perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
47. Jolly, J. A. (1993). Preposition assignment in English. In R. Van Valin (Ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar (pp. 275-310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Kemmerer, D. (1999). "Near" and "far" in language and perception. Cognition, 73, 35-63.
49. Kemmerer, D. (2004). The spatial and temporal meanings of English prepositions can be independently impaired. Manuscript submitted for publication.
50. Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2000a). A double dissociation between linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relationships. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 393-414.
51. Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2000b). Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 1. Analysis of stimulus, lexical, and conceptual factors. Brain and Language, 73, 347-392.
52. Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2000c). Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 2. Analysis of errors. Brain and Language, 73, 393-420.
53. Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2003). A double dissociation between the meanings of action verbs and locative prepositions. Neurocase, 9, 421-435.
54. Kemmerer, D., Tranel, D., & Barrash, J. (2001). Patterns of dissociation in the processing of verb meanings in brain-damaged subjects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 1-34.
55. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Kosslyn, S., Koenig, O., Barrett, C., Cave, C., Tang, J., & Gabrieli, J. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 723-735.
57. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Gitelman, D. R., & Alpert, N. M. (1998). Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations. Psychobiology, 26, 333-47.
58. Kuteva, T., & Sinha, C. (1994). Spatial and non-spatial uses of prepositions: Conceptual integrity across semantic domains. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Kognitive Semantikforschung (pp. 215-237). Berlin: Gunter Narr.
59. Laeng, B. (1994). Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: A study of unilateral stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 189-203.
60. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2001). Where mathematics comes from. Basic Books: New York.
62. Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). "What" and " where" in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 217-238.
63. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 353-382.
64. Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Rasch, B. H. (2002). Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition, 84, 155-188.
66. Lindstromberg, S. (1998). English prepositions explained Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
67. MacLaurey, R. (1989). Zapotec body-part locatives: Prototypes and metaphoric extensions. International Journal of American Linguistics, 55, 119-154.
68. Mayer, E., Martory, M.-D., Pegna, A. J., Landis, T., Delavelle, J., & Annoni, J.-M. (1999). A pure case of Gerstmann syndrome with a subangular lesion. Brain, 122, 1107-1120.
69. Mehta, Z., & Newcombe, F. (1991). A role for the left hemisphere in spatial processing. Cortex, 27, 153-67.
70. Milner, A., & Goodale, M. (1996). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Munnich, E., Landau, B., & Dosher, B. A. (2001). Spatial language and spatial representation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cognition, 81, 171-207.
72. Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S., Kita, S., & Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74, 557-589.
73. Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Friedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
74. Poucet, B. (1993). Spatial cognitive maps in animals. Psychological Review, 100, 163-182.
75. Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Preissl, H. (1999). Nouns and verbs in the intact brain: Evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency cortical responses. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 497-506.
76. Radden, G. (1985). Spatial metaphors underlying prepositions of causality. In W. Paprotté & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor (pp. 177-205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
77. Rice, S. (1993). Far afield in lexical fields: The English prepositions. In M. Bernstein (Ed.), Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1992. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
78. Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism: Production. Brain and Language 10, 249-262.
79. Sandra, D., & Rice, S. (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind - the linguist's or the language user's? Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 89-130.
80. Senft, G. (Ed.) (1997). Referring to space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in aphasia. Brain and Language, 10, 249-262.
82. Sinha, C., & Kuteva, T. (1995). Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, 167-199.
83. Slobin, D. I. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking." In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
85. Svorou, S. (1994). The grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
86. Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press.
87. Taylor, A. M., & Warrington, E. K. (1973). Visual discrimination in patients with localized brain lesions. Cortex, 9, 82-93.
88. Tesak, J., & Hummer, P. (1994). A note on prepositions in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 46, 463-468.
89. Thier, P., & Karnath, H.-O. (Eds.) (1997). Parietal contributions to orientation in 3D space. New York: Springer.
90. Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 14792-14797.
91. Tranel, D. (1996). The Iowa-Benton school of neuropsychological assessment. In I. Grant & K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders (2nd ed., pp. 81-101). New York: Oxford University Press.
92. Tranel, D. (2003). Disorders of color processing. In T. E. Feinberg & M. J. Farah (Eds.), Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 243-256). New York: McGraw Hill.
93. Tranel, D., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2001). A neural basis for the retrieval of words for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 655-670.
94. Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1319-1327.
95. Tranel, D., Kemmerer, D., Damasio, H., Adolphs, R., & Damasio, A. R. (2003). Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 409-432.
96. Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (1986). The ecological approach to perceiving acting. Acta Psychologica, 63, 133-55.
97. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
98. Vanier, M., & Caplan, D. (1990). CT-scan correlates of agrammatism. In L. Meen & L. Obler (Eds.), Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-language narrative sourcebook (pp. 37-114). Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
99. Van Valin, R., & LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Warrington, E. K., & Rabin, P. (1970). Perceptual matching in patients with cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia, 8, 475-87.
101. Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
102. Zelinsky-Wibbelt, C. (Ed.) (1993). The semantics of spatial prepositions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
103. Zurif, E. B., & Caramazza, A. (1976). Broca's aphasia: Studies in syntax and semantics. In H. Whitaker & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 261-292). New York: Academic Press.