Contributory infringement rule and patents

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 70, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 296-310

  Langinier, Corinne ^a   Marcoul, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Infringement; Network; Patents

Indexed keywords

EID: 64249143943     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2008.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aoki, R., Hu, J.L., 1999. A cooperative game approach to patent litigation, settlement and allocation of legal costs. Working paper 186, University of Auckland.
2. Bessen J., and Hunt R. An empirical look at software patents. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16 (2007) 157-189
3. Bessen, J., Maskin, E., forthcoming. Sequential innovation, patents and imitation. RAND Journal of Economics.
4. Blair R., and Cotter T. An economic analysis of seller and user liability in intellectual property law. University of Cincinnati Law Review 68 (1999) 1-45
5. Boldrin, M., Levine, D., 2003. Why Napster is right, http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/napster.htm.
6. Boyd J., and Ingberman D. Fly by night or face the music? Premature dissolution and the desirability of extended liability. American Law and Economics Review 5 (2003) 189-232
7. Crampes C., and Langinier C. Litigation and settlement in patent infringement cases. RAND Journal of Economics 33 (2002) 228-274
8. Daughety A. Settlement. In: Bouckaert B., and De Geest G. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (2000), Edward Elgar Publishing Co., Amsterdam 95-158
9. Daughety A., and Reinganum J. Economic theories of settlement bargaining. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 1 (2005) 35-59
10. Hay B., and Spier K. Manufacturer liability for harm caused by consumers to others. American Economic Review 95 (2005) 1700-1711
11. Jong S.J. Contributory infringement of patents in Korea. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 2 (2000) 287-307
12. Kaplow L., and Shavell S. Accuracy in the assessment of damages. Journal of Law and Economics 39 (1996) 191-210
13. Landes W., and Lichtman D. Indirect liability for copyright infringement: Napster and beyond. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 2 (2003) 113-124
14. Lemley M. Inducing patent infringement. U.C. Davis Law Review 39 (2005) 225-247
15. Lemley M., and Reese R.A. Reducing digital copyright infringement without restricting innovation. Stanford Law Review 56 (2004) 1345-1434
16. Loney, M., 2002. Hyperlink patent case fails to click. CNET, News.com, http://news.cnet.com/2100-1033-955001.html.
17. Merges R. As many as six impossible patents before breakfast: property rights for business concepts and patent system reform. Electronic Commerce Symposium 14 (1999) 578-615
18. Meurer M.J. The settlement of patent litigation. RAND Journal of Economics 20 (1989) 77-91
19. Rivette K., and Kline D. Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents (2000), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
20. Schankerman M., and Scotchmer S. Damages and injunctions in protecting intellectual property. RAND Journal of Economics 32 (2001) 199-220
21. Shapiro C. Navigating the patent thicket: cross licensing, patent pools, and standard-setting. In: Jaffe A., Lerner J., and Stern S. (Eds). Innovation Policy and the Economy vol. 1 (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 119-150
22. Shapiro C. Antitrust limits to patent settlements. RAND Journal of Economics 34 (2003) 391-411
23. Spier, K., 2007. Litigation. In: Polinsky, M., Shavell, S. (Eds.), The Handbook of Law and Economics, North Holland, pp. 259-334.
24. Warshofsky F. The Patent Wars (1994), John Wiley and Sons, New York